This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Representational sovereignty is the right of Indigenous peoples and other marginalized groups to control how their stories are told and to have a voice in how they are represented in the public sphere—whether in the media or in political decision-making processes.
Political and social science must come to the fore to help develop effective responses to tipping events. Conventional governance toolkits offer few if any tools designed for problems involving non-linear relationships and huge time-lags between cause and effect. The missing knowledge is not primarily natural science.
is politically insufficiently ambitious, but such a choice remains within the significant discretion of the legislature (¶¶159-162). Last but not least: the precautionaryprinciple requires that potentially colossal damage be averted. A swift political reaction. However, adopting a 1.5C to avoid passing the 1.5C
The finding relied on (i) the reasonable foreseeability of the risk of death or personal injury through heat waves or bushfires, (ii) the precautionaryprinciple, (iii) the special vulnerability of the children, (iv) their reliance on the Minister for protection, and (v) their innocence.
It’s called the PrecautionaryPrinciple and it’s widely accepted in environmental law in Canada and well beyond. She pointed out that Big Plastic’s interpretation of the PrecautionaryPrinciple would make it meaningless. They say that federal regulation of plastics is merely political. But it’s not, either.
As water and water runoff does not respect political boundaries, international laws on conservation and use are common and applied, especially where there is shared use and responsibility or competing claims to it. Laws here apply to surface water such as rivers, lakes and oceans, floodwater and ice meltwater, groundwater and the water table.
These latest political misadventures by Governor DeSantis are equal parts ostrich-like, head-in-the-sand behavior; straight out of the Flat Earth Society playbook; and reminiscent of Mad Magazine’s/Alfred E. All in an effort to score some cheap political points rather than serve Floridians’ long-term interests and welfare.
ministries in this case) and not the general public, is a result of governmental political decision, not an exercise of public administration. This argumentation is based on the doctrine that the approval of various conceptual documents primarily addressed to public authorities (i.e.
25] And that amount does not include the costs associated with local and state political opposition. But Breakthrough Energy calculated that the cost of new transmission, distribution, and storage would be $1.5 trillion. [25] 26] Local community and environmental opposition to transmission is a national and international phenomenon.
In a series of posts (beginning here , and ending here ) last month, I outlined an approach to climate policy that emphasizes the role of subsidies in building political support and technological progress for climate policy. In doing so, I drew heavily on existing political science research and case studies from North America and Europe.
The complaint alleged that Gallaudet “had earned plaudits for advancing the agency’s priorities in ocean and atmospheric sciences without succumbing to political interference with climate research.” Navy Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet as acting administrator of NOAA. Democracy Forward Foundation v. 1:19-cv-02751 (D.D.C., filed Sept.
The majority said it “reluctantly” concluded that “the plaintiffs’ case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large” and “[t]hat the other branches may have abdicated their responsibility to remediate the problem does not confer on Article III courts, no matter how well-intentioned, the ability to step into their shoes.”
America’s environmental agenda will be guided by true specialists in conservation, not those with radical political agendas. Layzer contends that US Conservatives have thus “created a storyline that undermines the environmental narrative by discrediting environmentalists and furnishing a principled basis for disputing their claims”. [2]
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content