This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
To adjust the focus of this picture a little closer, just our passenger cars and light trucks contribute to a whopping 58 percent of total transportation emissions, placing our car-centric society in the fossilfuel spotlight. Despite its emission reduction potential, this technology comes with caveats.
Production and combustion of fossilfuels imposes enormous costs on society, which the industry doesn’t pay for. A more promising alternative might be a clean-up tax on the fossilfuel industry. It wouldn’t require placing bets on what zero carbon technologies will win out. Download as PDF.
Fossilfuel power plant owners are facing increased accountability for their air and water pollution, including from a new round of environmental and public health protections that are being rolled out by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). We’ve heard these lazily disingenuous narratives before.
For more than 50 years, we have pioneered new policies and ushered in new technologies to clean our air and protect our climate. Over its short lifetime, the program has already transformed many segments of the fuels market. If CARB approves amendments to the program, the shift to clean fuels in California will only accelerate.
Quickly and sharply tapering down the use of fossilfuels, which are the main driver of human-caused climate change, is just as crucial if we are to have any chance of keeping climate extremes from spiraling further out of control. We must also demand that fossilfuel companies be held accountable for the harms they are causing.
The same scenario has played out with the power plants that use fossilfuels, predominantly methane (“natural”) gas, delivered by pipelines. At the same time, extreme weather events are becoming more common as more fossilfuel is burned and carbon is released into the air. It’s a vicious feedback loop.
Long discussed but rarely used, carbon capture and storage projects — which bury waste CO2 underground — are on the rise globally. Some analysts see the technology as a necessary tool in reducing emissions, but others say it simply perpetuates the burning of fossilfuels. Read more on E360 ?.
To be more specific, the law forbids the California Energy Commission from issuing a permit to any new nuclear fission power plants until theres a way to dispose of toxic and long-lived nuclear waste. The cost of other energy technologies matters as well. So if solar, wind, energy storage, geothermal, etc. There are three reasons.
The legislation committed nearly $400 billion to support, among other things, wind and solar power, battery storage, electric vehicles, and other clean energy technologies that will make a significant dent in US heat-trapping emissions. It also will save US consumers money because they will spend less on fossilfuels.
. – Ontario has launched the second phase of a program to expand fossilfuel gas pipelines to new communities. Instead of supporting viable and more cost-effective clean technologies like heat pumps, Ontario is spending more than $234 million to support approximately 8750 connections – a subsidy of over $26,000 per customer.
The complaint is a cri de coeur : clear, outraged, and horrifying in its recounting of the plastic waste problem and its causes. In recent years, ExxonMobil has deceptively touted its “advanced recycling technology” as a proprietary “breakthrough in recycling technology,” says the complaint.
Communities and ecosystems continue to suffer the consequences of human-caused climate change , primarily from the burning of fossilfuels across our economy. The case for phasing out of fossilfuels and making a just and equitable transition to clean energy has never been more clear. comes from burning fossilfuels.
Paul Arbaje is an energy analyst in the Climate & Energy program at the Union of Concerned Scientists and an expert on electricity policies and reforms that reduce fossilfuel use and reliance. The energy enthusiast who owns their own homes can take further steps toward making their homes completely free of direct fossilfuel use.
degrees–the goal of the Paris Agreement and a critical threshold for climate change–the world must stop approving fossilfuel projects AND significantly ramp down the production of all fossilfuels: coal, oil, and fossil gas. This is a huge deal. So what do we need governments to do? Starting now.
methane released from fossilfuel systems) could entirely undermine the climate benefits of the hydrogen tax credit and, worse, drive vast amounts of public dollars to subsidize what are ultimately still heavily-polluting fossilfuel-based projects, now just greenwashed as “clean.”
Because one of Pennsylvania’s two hubs, ARCH2, is also proposing to be heavily reliant on fossilfuel-based hydrogen production projects, I also detailed the serious risks of policymakers propping up such an approach. Here are three critical flags with pursuing a fossil-based “clean” hydrogen future.
The majority 6–3 decision sharply curtails the EPA’s authority to set standards based on a broad range of flexible options to cut carbon emissions from the power sector—options such as replacing polluting fossilfuels with cheap and widely available wind and solar power coupled with battery storage. There is no time to waste.
Alongside a rapid phase-out of fossilfuels, substantial deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques might avert – or at least limit – overshoot of 1.5°C. However, it seems much of the carbon will come not from CDR, but from carbon capture on existing or new fossilfuel use. But some optimism remains.
I’ve written recently about why a Cap on Vegetable Oil-Based Fuels Will Stabilize and Strengthen California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard , which addresses the bio-based diesel credits. This approach holds fuel producers accountable for reducing fossilfuel use and other global warming pollution in their supply chains.
Any day now, Minister Freeland is expected to introduce a giant new fossilfuel subsidy called the carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) investment tax credit. The government is breaking their own rules The government introduced new rules to end fossilfuel subsidies this summer. Let me tell you why.
A new report released by Oil Change International reveals that governments worldwide have already wasted over $40 billion on carbon capture and hydrogen projects. That’s why we say the money was wasted. Even worse, these governments are gearing up to waste billions more – over $300 billion more! Take carbon capture.
by Lisa Sheppard, Prairie Research Institute As renewable energy is poised to replace fossilfuels long term in Illinois, the Illinois Sustainable Technology Center (ISTC) is delving into a looming issue: what to do with solar modules, wind turbines, and electric vehicle batteries that are no longer used.
With an outsized credit for the lowest-carbon tier, the incentive’s aim is clear: Drive deployment of hydrogen production technologies that will be needed by, and aligned with , the nation’s overall clean energy transition. But instead of meeting that straightforward aim, a series of implementation loopholes threaten to fully undermine it.
Most prominently, because the approach is changing from rewarding specific technologies to rewarding anything that meets the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions threshold of “clean”—hence the “tech-neutral” label—exactly how the government goes about determining whether or not something is actually eligible will be enormously important.
Taylor, a professor at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Mine Cleanup Law Weakened by Coal’s Decline — Reclamation is a flashpoint for the partisan divide over fossilfuels. It is expensive, though, and generates a waste brine that requires disposal. Brett Walton, Interim Stream Editor.
One factor is the dirtiness of fossilfuels. Even plants with the same fuel might use it differently. A combined-cycle gas plant might have an efficiency of 60 percent , while a gas peaker plant might be 20- to 35-percent efficient—that is, waste as much as 80 percent of the energy in its fuel.
Meanwhile, it remains profoundly cheaper to produce electricity from solar than from new fossilfuel sources. It can buy time for PJM to focus on high-value additions to the grid through its SSI, the cheaper clean energy waiting in the queue , and deployment of grid enhancing technologies.
CCS is a multi-billion dollar boondoggle that doesn’t come close to the hype, has significant safety risks, and is a substantial distraction from real climate solutions, such as building more renewable energy, increasing electricity transmission infrastructure, and developing and using storage technology. Want proof?
A 1 megawatt vanadium flow battery (a different technology from lithium-ion, but also used for energy storage) is in Pullman, Washington, built by UniEnergy Technologies and owned by Avista Utilities. Source: UniEnergy Technologies / Wikimedia Commons. Engineers develop energy storage battery technologies. Batteries.
On a remote island close to where the Pacific meets the Indian Oceansits one of the first refineries built specifically to support the world’s transition away from fossilfuels. Extracting it, refining it … Continue reading To meet EV demand, industry turns to technology long deemed hazardous
While landfills are certainly less environmentally damaging destinations for trash than the ocean, this still means material is wasted. It’s great that this packaging waste is not ending up in the ocean or even a landfill—at least not right away; but the catch is that these new products are typically not recycled again.
We believe we must take a science-based approach and prioritize policies and technologies that enable us to liberate nature and elevate humanity. Notably, in the same proposal, the Commission has also included screening criteria for gaseous fossilfuels. of the proposal) and for existing installation only until 2040 (see §4.28).
Under DOE’s Industrial Efficiency and Decarbonization Office the nine organizations— eight regional and one national— will establish a network of Technical Assistance Partnerships to accelerate the integration and deployment of clean energy technologies.
This is important if they are used in key technologies such as mobile phones, which is designated in the table using an icon. According to the European Chemical Society this reflects the serious threat to the environment that the burning of carbon-based fossilfuels poses and the fact that some oil is extracted in areas of conflict.
of the world’s total carbon dioxide emissions from fossilfuel combustion, many airlines are considering carbon-capture-and-storage technologies and electric-powered planes. Sustainable aviation fuels (or SAFs), however, are an immediate tool that could help airlines kick-start their green transition. “The
Upstream methane emissions are a potentially substantial share of the overall emissions rate of fossilfuel-based hydrogen production facilities. This would be an egregious waste of taxpayer dollars and an untenable waste of finite time for investing in projects that unlock real and durable climate progress.
Taking advantage of new technologies will be essential if the world is to achieve its net-zero goals. While solar and wind energy might be the first clean-energy technologies that spring to mind, they are not the only low-carbon options. All technologies have advantages and disadvantages.
Waste-To-Energy Tech Could Slash U.S. For systems that can afford the upfront costs of these waste-to-energy technologies, the process is a win-win. And, because the process reduces methane emissions from the sewage and displaces fossilfuel-powered energy, utilities can slash their net emissions in the process.
Sandy Field and Karen Elias were the lead authors on the 47-page Statement Regarding Emerging Technologies that Represent False Solutions to the Climate Crisis. Field and Elias are both members of a False Solutions network that formed in 2020 when Gov.
Concerns about the feasibility of some energy transition targets have intensified, driven in no small part by resistance from fossilfuel industries and growing public scepticism in many regions, where populists have framed ambitious environmental promises as unrealistic or out of touch with voters’ concerns.
The process is a win-win for systems that can afford the upfront costs of these waste-to-energy technologies. And utilities can slash their net emissions at the same time, because the process reduces methane emissions from the sewage and displaces fossilfuel-powered energy. The energy savings are equally immense.
Hydrogen may have lost the race to fuel electric cars but it looks a likely contender to replace fossilfuels in trucks, ships, planes and heavy industry. The Tokyo Olympics will be powered by a fuel with ambition – hydrogen. It is planning to replace fossilfuels with hydrogen in heavy industries such as steel-making.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content