This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This decision , reached with a 6-3 majority led by Chief Justice John Roberts, marks a significant shift in administrative law and has profound implications for environmentalregulations and climate accountability. Successful court cases could limit the scope of future regulations.
In what could turn out to be another loss for environmentalprotection in the Supreme Court, the Court is about to decide a major case about the scope of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). In addition, the impact statement was governed by the 1970 version of NEPA and the 1978 White House NEPA regulations.
The US EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) is charged with the Herculean and crucial task of assessing which chemicals are innocuous and which ones need to be banned or restricted because they pose a threat to our health or the environment. Fortunately, EPA has begun a slow pivot toward assessing multiple chemicals at once.
Despite the wide range of issues the legislature was contending with, many innovative environmentalprotection issues advanced, especially those aimed at tackling environmental health challenges in our most disadvantaged communities.
On January 28, the Department of EnvironmentalProtection said compliance with a 2022 state Air Quality regulation to reduce methane emissions from oil and gas facilities was put on hold for the conventional oil and gas industry as a result of an agreement to stay a legal challenge to the regulations in Commonwealth Court.
During an April 1 webinar, the Department of EnvironmentalProtection said it would be using a new General Air Quality Permit to implement the new federal oil and gas facility methane reduction requirements. DEP now uses two general permits to regulate emissions from shale gas facilities-- GP-5 and GP-5A. Read more here.
The Sabin Center has previously discussed the regulation of OAE here and here. A new Sabin Center report continues the conversation by focusing on the regulation of OAE in Washington State. OAE projects conducted in near-shore areas off the Washington coast may be subject to regulation at the federal, state, tribal and local levels.
Seaweed cultivation and sinking are regulated by a number of different laws at the state and federal levels. The ADF&G regulates seaweed cultivation, providing aquatic farm operation permits. Independent of the joint permit, the ADEC also regulates water quality in Alaska. EPA may regulate seaweed sinking under the MPRSA.
People in Canada want a less toxic future, said Cassie Barker, Senior Program Manager for Toxics at Environmental Defence. Canadas move to regulate PFAS forever chemicals earlier this year puts it on the leading edge of countries working to get this class of harmful chemicals out of products.
PA Bulletin, page 7526 ) PA Bulletin - November 16, 2024 Note: The Department of EnvironmentalProtection published 60 pages of public notices related to proposed and final permit and approval/ disapproval actions in the November 16 PA Bulletin - pages 7475 to 7535. Notice of new technical guidance documents and regulations?
EV battery end of life bill life ended on Governor’s desk Due to the necessarily ambitious regulations we fought to pass, California will continue to see a huge increase in the number of EVs on the road. As these regulations drive down emissions, we will also see an increase in battery retirements.
Senator Shelly Moore Capito (R-WV), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW), has scheduled a hearing on the Nomination of Lee Zeldin to be Administrator of the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) for Thursday, January 16, at 10:00 a.m. appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
The Guide The Union of Concerned Scientists and Coming Clean , together with community and environmental justice organizations, co-developed a Guide to help you learn about and organize around cumulative impacts policies. And grassroots advocates and scientists are working together to put that approach into action.
PA Bulletin - November 23, 2024 Note: The Department of EnvironmentalProtection published 60 pages of public notices related to proposed and final permit and approval/ disapproval actions in the November 23 PA Bulletin - pages 7575 to 7635. Notice of new technical guidance documents and regulations? Read more here.
Voters will decide on a constitutional amendment for environmental rights. On November 2, New Yorkers will vote on amending their state constitution to include environmentalprotections, including clean water. New York City skyline. Carl Ganter/Circle of Blue. At least a dozen other states are considering similar amendments.
Lead has long been confirmed toxic under Canada’s environmentalprotection law (CEPA), and DEHP was recently added to the list. These substances are linked to brain damage and ADHD, liver damage, reproductive harms and other devastating diseases. So why are these substances allowed to be in kids’ shoe charms or any other product?
It also wants to destroy environmentalregulation, especially climate law. The combination of authoritarianism, extreme conservative ideology, and anti-environmentalism is common globally, not just in U.S. Researchers have found links between two psychological dispositions and hostility to environmentalprotection.
This is the second in a series of posts on the reasons we might have environmental review. Why might we have an environmental review statute such as NEPA when we already have a range of other environmentalprotection statutes such as the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and more? The first post is here.
13, 2024, the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) released a proposed draft 2026 Multi-Sector General Permit for Industrial Stormwater Discharges (MSGP). The MSGP is a general permit that regulates stormwater discharges from various industrial facilities. On Friday, Dec.
EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) on hazardous substance restrictions. Bergeson Quoted inChemical & Engineering NewsArticle EPA kicks chemical regulations down the road appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. On March 19, 2025, comments byLynn L.
They want Canada to list all PFAS chemicals as toxic under Canada’s EnvironmentalProtection Act, and finalize strong rules to keep these chemicals out of the products we use every day. This would make a real difference in protecting our families and our planet.
Second, the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) is in the process of setting regulations for future passenger vehicles—and casting doubt on EV sales is a tactic to push for weaker regulations. Sowing doubt about EVs to influence regulations? Are EV sales actually slowing?
In effect, judges with no subject matter expertise on the substance of a case will be deciding the technical details and best approach for a huge range of issues in public health, environmentalprotection, public safety, conservation and more. To stymy regulations so that businesses have and even freer hand. Everyone else.
. -- The Public Utility Commission published notice in the December 21 PA Bulletin inviting comments on a proposed settlement with Columbia Gas concerning welding issues at a natural gas regulator station in Beaver County. Notice of new technical guidance documents and regulations? 14th Floor Rachel Carson Building. Centre County. (
The Department of EnvironmentalProtection will host an April 1 webinar to provide an opportunity for the public to learn more about the Departments approach to implementing a federal program to reduce methane and other pollution from existing oil and gas operation s-- both conventional oil and gas and shale gas wells and infrastructure.
On December 4, the Department of EnvironmentalProtection announced grant awards totaling $600,000 to 12 community organizations across Pennsylvania through the new Pennsylvania Engaging New Voices on Environmental Justice program. EnvironmentalProtection Agency’s Environmental Justice Government-To-Government grant.
Last week, the US EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) finalized updated regulations for certain facilities that emit ethylene oxide (EtO), a colorless, cancer-causing gas. For the first time, the government will regulate fugitive or “unintended” emissions and require permanent total enclosure of sterilization operations.
Read more here. -- The Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Board published notice in the January 18 PA Bulletin inviting comments on proposed changes to regulations establishing eligibility requirements for paying claims under the underground tank cleanup program. Notice of new technical guidance documents and regulations?
When facilities emit less pollution, their regulations require less specific record-keeping and monitoring. How stringently facilities are monitored should be based on science and on the impacts on the people who live nearby—not by a judge’s ideological viewpoint on regulation.
EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) and various state governments have been busy at work setting new PFAS standards, prohibitions and … Continue reading A new year brings new PFAS regulations and reporting requirements Read the full story from Warner Norcross + Judd.
The consultants, who worked for Dow, the pesticide’s manufacturer, help corporate interests defend their products against environmental and health regulations.
EnvironmentalProtection Agency released its first draft assessment of PFAS in biosolids, finding health risks for people living on or near areas where biosolids are land applied or deposited in an unlined landfill. Pathogens are also regulated for Class A biosolids, like Milorganite.) Yesterday, the U.S.
The US EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) regulates emissions of EtO, yet the agency is years behind on updating standards and control requirements, despite mounting evidence of the harm of long-term EtO exposure. A decade overdue , EPA is finalizing updated regulations for commercial sterilizers now.
PA Bulletin, page 8491 ) -- Republic Environmental Systems (PA) LLC - Hazardous, Residual Waste Storage, Treatment Facility: DEP invites comments on the renewal of the waste permit for the facility located in Hatfield Twp., Notice of new technical guidance documents and regulations? acre solar energy facility in Porter Twp.,
formal notice) PA Bulletin - November 30 , 2024 Note: The Department of EnvironmentalProtection published 87 pages of public notices related to proposed and final permit and approval/ disapproval actions in the November 30 PA Bulletin - pages 7679 to 7766. Notice of new technical guidance documents and regulations?
Microplastics have been found in almost every drinking water source in the United States, but there is no federal testing or regulation for this harmful substance. The governors petition can force the EPA to start monitoring and regulating microplastics, but it will take all of us to push Governor Shapiro to act.
The Department of EnvironmentalProtection to recommend the Environmental Quality Board accept a rulemaking petition for study proposing increases in setbacks from shale gas wells to better protect the public at the April 8 Board meeting.
A growing body of scientific evidence supports regulating chemicals with similar structures, functions, and impacts as a chemical class rather than one pollutant at a time. This is particularly important for pesticides since active ingredients are regulated while so-called “inert ingredients” are normally not.
On April 9, the Department of EnvironmentalProtection announced it has reviewed and acted on more than 9,000 permit applications and ensured those permits were enforced properly by conducting more than 28,000 inspections of regulated facilities.
This week’s episode of What’s Up With Water covers a setback to the environmental rights of nature in Florida and a recent lawsuit against the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency. EnvironmentalProtection Agency faces a lawsuit over its recent action in response to PFAS chemicals in drinking water.
Earlier this year, environmental health advocates scored a big win when the EPA (EnvironmentalProtection Agency) updated the ethylene oxide sterilizer rule requiring commercial sterilizers to significantly lower their emissions. Overburdened communities are not being protected fast enough by these incremental approaches.
EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) delayed until March 21, 2025, the effective date of a January 2025 rule adding nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to the list of chemicals subject to toxic chemical release reporting under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA).
Highlights of the environmental and energy notices in the February 15 PA Bulletin -- -- The Governors Office published an updated agency-by-agency Regulatory Agenda in the February 15 PA Bulletin that lists regulations in development, an estimated schedule of consideration and opportunities for public comments. Read more here.
While the US US EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) has known that ethylene oxide is a carcinogen since 2016, the agency currently does not account for these cancer risks in regulations for facilities that use ethylene oxide. Children are especially at risk of harm from breathing ethylene oxide.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content