This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
EnvironmentalProtection Agency et al. The petitioners who brought this case include state-level political officials and coal companies who are single-mindedly determined to block climate action and perpetuate fossilfuel dependence to serve their narrow political or business interests.
In order to enforce those standards, the state must be granted a waiver by the EnvironmentalProtection Agency, something which Congress makes very clear should be given under virtually all conditions. Over 10,000 UCS supporters chimed in with EPA in support of granting California’s ability to enforce its truck regulations.
On February 28, the Department of EnvironmentalProtection awarded $1.5 million in 2022 Alternative Fuels Incentive Grant funding to help municipalities, schools, and businesses around the state switch to clean transportation and improve air quality in their communities. Click Here for a list of projects funded.
Shapiro and CNX Resources Corporation announced the Department of EnvironmentalProtection will begin conducting an independent study of unconventional shale gas well pad air emissions. On May 1, Gov. Read more here.] Air monitoring is likely to be completed in 2029. Click Here for the text of the Shapiro Administration announcement.
Shell also emitted the dangerous pollutants nitrogenoxides and carbon monoxide from sources at the plant in the final months of 2022 at rates that exceed permit limits. The Shell petrochemicals complex is ground zero for an identity crisis playing out in the fossilfuel space.
Despite the generous funding opportunities and holistic flexibilities baked into ACF, confusion around and misinformation about the rule may undermine this much-needed shift away from fossil-fueled trucks and buses. The IRA also provides up to $100,000 in assistance per commercial vehicle charger under Section 30C.
One of the most significant air quality challenges in the Basin is reducing emissions of the ozone precursor nitrogenoxides (NO x ) to meet the ozone standard attainment deadlines. According to the 2016 AQMP, mobile sources contributed about 88% of total NO x emissions in the Basin in 2012.
A team of transportation and policy experts from the University of California released a report today to the California EnvironmentalProtection Agency (CalEPA) outlining policy options to significantly reduce transportation-related fossilfuel demand and emissions.
Costly and Inequitable In addition to emitting greenhouse gases, gas power plants also pollute the air with nitrogenoxides, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and volatile organic compounds.
And fossilfuel power plants may not stick to their retirement schedules for a variety of reasons. But if plant owners actually do follow through on their retirement plans, there will be real, tangible public health and environmental benefits. A bit more on those reasons later. What can be done?
That means it includes the extreme wildfires exacerbated by the fossilfuel industry that burned more than 4% of California in 2021 and 2022. come from burning fossilfuels and pesticide use, and ultrafine particles (PM0.1) These particles are categorized by size.
While the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA)has drawn all the attention lately for its spring proposals to cut emissions from new vehicles by electrifying both passenger cars and heavy trucks, the o.g. And if we are to address our fossilfuel dependence ASAP, we need to be targeting both near-term and long-term reductions.
Image via PickPik On May 23, the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (“EPA”) proposed emission limits and guidelines for carbon dioxide from fossilfuel-powered plants. In addition to those arguing about feasibility and cost, environmental justice groups have also voiced hesitation about the two new technologies.
We need more electricity to transition our homes and cars off fossilfuels, but we can’t afford to let that electricity come from more gas power plants. But gas plants also release emissions of nitrogenoxides, more commonly referred to as NOx emissions, that contribute to smog and other pollutants.
As we now know, fossilfuel companies lied about it for decades to protect their profits. Now that there is a desperate need to slash global warming emissions worldwide to avoid the worst consequences of climate change, it is critical to rapidly phase out the use of all fossilfuels. What accounts for that?
The Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) rule, which I’ve blogged about in detail before, will phase out fossil-fueled trucks over the next several decades. Many electric work vans and home-delivery trucks already show a favorable lifetime cost over comparable fossil-fueled models. There are more than 1.8 pollution from vehicles.
Communities and ecosystems continue to suffer the consequences of human-caused climate change , primarily from the burning of fossilfuels across our economy. The case for phasing out of fossilfuels and making a just and equitable transition to clean energy has never been more clear. comes from burning fossilfuels.
The analysis leverages emissions data from the Department of EnvironmentalProtection and applies U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency methodologies to assign a dollar value to each ton of nitrogenoxide and sulfur dioxide reduced. billion in NOx and $445.1 billion - $1.02 billion in NOx and $445.1
EnvironmentalProtection Agency show that CO2 accounts for the vast majority of heat-trapping greenhouse gases emitted by the U.S. Concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere have risen approximately 47 percent since 1750, mostly from the burning of fossilfuels for energy. Studies by the U.S. from 1990–2019.
The fossilfuel industry has systematically contaminated our environment with a wide range of toxic chemicals for over a century. Examples are benzene, hydrofluoric acid, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogenoxides, and many, many other toxic pollutants. Refining uses many risky industrial processes.
in Somerset County -- WHYY: My Climate Story: Philly Students Take Science From Abstract To Personal -- Reading Eagle: Berks Nature Nonprofit Has Evolved Over Its 50-Year History -- MCall: C.F.
Applications were evaluated for their degree of environmentalprotection, innovation, partnership, economic impact, consideration of climate change, sustainability, and environmental justice, as well as outcomes achieved. LR100 has the lowest carbon footprint of any commercially available biogenic fuel. Read more here.
The UN’s Climate Change Conference is just about to kick off in Dubai, juxtaposing the powerful political power of the fossilfuel industry and the desperate need to reduce oil and gas usage as we face an ongoing climate crisis.
The Cuyahoga fire, along with a major oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara that same year, galvanized national attention and led to the first Earth Day, a slew of new air and water protection laws, and the creation of new federal departments to administer them, including the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA).
Last month, the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) proposed new power plant carbon pollution standards that, if strengthened, would go a long way to help meet the Biden administration’s goal of slashing carbon emissions in half from 2005 levels by the end of this decade. And as the West Virginia v. JM: That’s right.
Given the deadly risks of soot, especially to communities assaulted by polluting industries and vehicle exhaust from highways and heavy trucking, there’s nothing fine about the EnvironmentalProtection Agency’s (EPA’s) recent proposal to clamp down on fine-particulate pollution. You don’t have to be a scientist to understand why.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content