This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Policymakers and regulators must act quickly because the market is not going to solve this problem on its own, and its definitely not going to do it in a way that protects low- and middle-income people. State insurance regulators sought more than 70 data points. An anonymized subset of the data was shared with FIO.
Accelerating risks from climatechange are colliding with shortcomings in insurance markets—such as a lack of transparent information and affordability provisions—to create a perfect storm for people and communities on the front lines of floods, droughts, and wildfires. Many of these disasters bear the fingerprints of climatechange.
Scientists are sounding the alarm because this warming is shockingly bigbigger than what we would have expected given the long-term warming trend from fossil fuel-caused climatechange. Meanwhile, sharply cutting our use of fossil fuels is the best way to limit carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, the primary driver of climatechange.
Fossil fuel companies are well established as founts of disinformation , agents of obstruction, and drivers of climatechange. Taken together, the need for governments to meaningfully regulate these super polluters has never been clearer. What is an advisory opinion? Which courts are expected to issue Advisory Opinions?
Our new report outlines a framework for building a more responsible battery supply chain, drawing insights from the European Unions Sustainable Batteries Regulation (2023). Refining processes , particularly in countries with lax environmental regulations, emit greenhouse gases and toxic waste.
ClimateChange Grips Trout Streams Across the Nation: How Anglers Are Responding Across the country, anglers have watched as droughts, floods, and high temperatures batter the rivers they depend on. The issue has begun changing minds about climatechange among recreational fishermen, a demographic that leans politically conservative.
Fossil fuels are the main driver of climatechange and the terrifying effects of it that we see happening across the world. That makes this dataset a powerful tool for understanding how each of these entity’s heat-trapping emissions have contributed to climatechange. The fossil fuel industry knew that too.
That’s why California is taking, or should take, these steps: Sue the fossil fuel industry for damages Extensive scientific research has shown how fossil fuel companies have contributed to worsening climatechange impacts. When the economy-wide cost of capital fell, utilities’ regulated rates of return did not fall nearly as much.
is a serious blow to the EPA’s ability to fight climatechange—and could have dangerous repercussions beyond this case. The timing of the decision feels especially harsh, as the nation is in the throes of the “ Danger Season ” for hazards such as heat waves, drought, wildfires and hurricanes, all worsened by climatechange.
The rules, known as the Clean Electricity Regulations (CER), were finalized in December 2024. The Clean Electricity Regulations are an important part of Canadas climate plan. The regulations work by placing an annual limit on the pollution from electricity produced using fossil fuels. So, do they do the job? GW in 2023.
The regulator can only be effective if it is independent from the industries it oversees. The regulator can only be effective if it is independent from the industries it oversees. The AER has consistently failed to fulfill its mandate to ensure safe, environmentally responsible energy development.
Interestingly and accurately, the OIRA started its report with the simple sentiment that public participation makes better regulations. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) used this approach during their rulemaking around protecting communities from the impacts of climatechange in HUD-assisted housing projects.
But what makes the case important is the courts use of hard look judicial review, which environmentalists have often used to attack bad regulations. It helped create the framework for regulating pesticides and upheld the use of a precautionary approach rather than requiring EPA to have definitive evidence. v.EPA (1975). EPA (2012 ).
On April 25, the Department of Environmental Protection announced the release of the 2024 ClimateChange Action Plan Update and 2024 Climate Impacts Assessment Report. Visit DEPs ClimateChange webpage for more information on these and other Pennsylvania climate initiatives. Read more here.
Eagle County , has important implications for issues such as whether NEPA covers climatechange impacts. In addition, the impact statement was governed by the 1970 version of NEPA and the 1978 White House NEPA regulations. The case, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. The facts are quite unusual.
Thats why I believe the Climate Accountability Act is a critical step for Wisconsin, especially given all the ways the federal government is trying to move us backward on addressing climatechange. the federal government is trying to move us backwards on addressing climatechange.
Rather than rehearse familiar arguments, I want to focus specifically on climatechange. In my view, holding out for ideal climate policies makes no sense. Because of the nature of climatechange, delay is just too costly. Climatechange is a unique problem in many ways.
Statement by Alienor Rougeot, Senior Program Manager, Climate and Energy, on Ontario’s claims regarding the federal Clean Electricity Regulations. The federal government’s proposed regulations to reduce emissions in electricity generation are achievable without breaking the bank.
On March 29, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on States obligations regarding climatechange. ii) Peoples and individuals of the present and future generations affected by the adverse effects of climatechange?
The absence of baseline regulation of dairy operations isn’t limited to greenhouse gas emissions. But here’s the thing: CARB itself has the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from dairies. CARB can regulate dairy methane. Timestamp at 2:05:10). Agricultural operations are almost uniquely unregulated.
Statement from Aly Hyder Ali, Oil and Gas Program Manager, Environmental Defence Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People – We welcome the Government of Canada’s Oil and Gas Greenhouse Gas Pollution Cap draft regulation, which aims to curb pollution from the oil and gas industry.
Some estimates suggest they could disappear by 2030 due to the climatechange triggered by human fossil fuel use, which began less than 200 years ago. Glaciers, once thought of as static, timeless icons, have become a fleeting phenomenon, highlighting the urgent need for action on climatechange.
People can no longer deny climatechange must be addressed. Many lawmakers acknowledge that their constituents are being hammered by climate impacts, and they see the world around them changing. Of course, every clean energy resource has room for improvement in terms of technical innovation.
This decision , reached with a 6-3 majority led by Chief Justice John Roberts, marks a significant shift in administrative law and has profound implications for environmental regulations and climate accountability. Successful court cases could limit the scope of future regulations. Worse, agencies may decide not to even try.
This may seem like a setback for climate progress in Canada, but it simply underscores the limits of voluntary initiatives and the need for the government to enforce climate-aligned financial regulations. This news also coincides with Mark Carneys official entrance into the Liberal Party leadership race.
Prime Minister Trudeaus recent decision to prorogue Parliament and announce his upcoming resignation may have left you wondering about what this could mean for climatechange policy. All political leaders should be bolder on climate. Last month we polled Canadians to see what kind of climate action people want to see.
Today, Gav Ward, a legal futurist and digital strategist, steps into this lineage with […] The post The Next Nikola Tesla or Marie Curie of ClimateChange Legal Innovation? Gav Ward Proposes Global Law Approach appeared first on ClimateChange Blawg: ClimateChange Law Blogs, News & Insights.
The California Air Resources Board at the time: predicted that the new [Advanced Clean Cars] program and ZEV regulations would result in over 1.4 Second, regulators in California, at least at the time, were clearly aiming too low with their goals! million ZEVs on the road by 2025, comprising over 15 percent of vehicles sales that year.
UN Photo/ICJ-CIJ/ Frank van Beek This blog post is Part 3 of a three-part series highlighting the main legal arguments presented during the hearings of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the request for an advisory opinion regarding the obligations of States with respect to climatechange.
This week, the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights (IACHR) started to hear testimony at the University of the West Indies , near Bridgetown, Barbados, addressing one of the most pressing global issues of our time: climatechange and its implications on human rights. You can watch the full testimony here.
Yet, this enforcement does not change the need for urgent regulatory reform in Alberta. It is not the job of impacted communities and their allies to police the regulator. Albertans need a regulator that lives up to its mandate: protecting the environment and public health rather than working for corporate interests.
While nonbinding, the unanimous advisory opinion offers important support for small island nations facing climate impacts and raises the bar for other nations to reduce their global warming emissions to protect the world’s oceans. Lays out polluting nations’ obligations.
That’s not just what I think, it’s not just what is required to slow climatechange, it’s what many of the world’s automakers have publicly stated. Sowing doubt about EVs to influence regulations? It’s a transition that needs to happen, and as quickly as possible to avoid the worst impacts of climatechange.
Most climate action today rightly focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately, these efforts are necessary, but not sufficient to meet global climate targets. The Sabin Center has previously discussed the regulation of OAE here and here. In Washington State, certain state laws regulate ocean resources.
Their basic infrastructure is aging, budgets are tight, and they face a barrage of stressors, from population growth to climatechange and shifting regulatory expectations. A key finding is that regulation, which is critical for protecting public and environmental health, can encourage or impede innovation.
Standing based on climate impacts C. Climate science F. Climate justice II. EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act (CAA) A. Climatechange under other federal statutes. Climatechange as substantial impact requiring discussion in environmental impact statement.
And current EPA regulations for public health don’t require facilities to account for fugitive emissions , meaning companies have no reason to rein them in. These GHGs are not regulated, so producers can emit them freely. And any fines for violating regulations are paltry sums to companies that make billions of dollars per quarter.
While many environmental effects may already be considered and regulated under other statutes, there may be many other effects that are not considered under other statutes. It might be because the environmental effect is an uncommon one, one that was not seen as widespread or important enough to justify regulation.
The fossil fuel industry has known for decades that its products cause climatechang e Contrary to what the fossil fuel industry would like you to believe, the link between burning fossil fuels and climatechange has been well established for decades.
For example, there’s a current challenge to EPA’s waiver under the Clean Air Act for the Air Resources Board’s Advanced Clean Trucks regulations (ACT), which require that zero-emission trucks represent an increasing proportion of in-state heavy-duty truck sales. (A
Thats why I was happy to partner with Environmental Defence and use my platform to promote renewable energy, action against climatechange, and our most valuable resource: wide open untouched, healthy nature. For winter athletes, climatechange poses existential risks to doing what they love.
My own priorities are public health, climatechange, and preservation of biodiversity/ecosystems. It is significant because if its huge public health benefits and because it has provided the basis for EPA regulation of greenhouse gases. I included all laws passed in the U.S., Inflation Reduction Act. Reader’s Choice.
To equip policymakers with necessary information on satellite methane data, UC Berkeley Laws Center for Law, Energy and the Environment (CLEE), the UCLA Law Emmett Institute on ClimateChange and the Environment are releasing a guide for policymakers, Hunting Methane Using Satellites.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content