This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Late in the federal court hearings last week, in their lawsuit against plastics regulations , Big Plastic’s arguments went completely off the rails. It’s called the PrecautionaryPrinciple and it’s widely accepted in environmental law in Canada and well beyond. They say that federal regulation of plastics is merely political.
Despite the ongoing debate on whether ITLOS has jurisdiction to issue an advisory opinion on climatechange, if the Tribunal asserts jurisdiction (on jurisdiction, see here and here) , there is still much to uncover. Assuming the ITLOS will assert jurisdiction, this post’s objective is twofold.
And other principles of international law will work to ensure that any measure is sensitive the different contributions parties have made to climatechange, views any uncertainties through the lens of the precautionaryprinciple, and respects fundamental rights of all.
Parties to the agreement agree to be guided by 11 principles, including the principles of non-regression and progressive realization, the preventative principle, the precautionaryprinciple, and the principle of intergenerational equity.
Treaty obligations are also understood as obligations arising from EU secondary law, including obligations in EU regulations, directives, and decisions. This regulation establishes a special EU fund to support populations, economies, and the environment in territories that face socio-economic problems related to the energy transition process.
Environmental law, or sometimes known as environmental and natural resources law, is a term used to explain regulations, statutes, local, national and international legislation, and treaties designed to protect the environment from damage and to explain the legal consequences of such damage towards governments or private entities or individuals (1).
OIRA, the so-called “regulatory czar” in the White House, must approve every significant regulation based on a review of its CBA. This issue is especially important in the context of climatechange, given the potential for tipping points to produce disastrous outcomes. But CBA has had a major blind spot.
The first lesson is one consistent with the pre-existing literature and case studies generally speaking, the most effective policies in driving short-term reductions are a mix of different tools, including subsidies, pricing, and regulation.
We are driving a dagger through the heart of climate-change religion and ushering in Americas Golden Age, or so said EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, who used to be considered a fairly rational person. And scientists haven’t ignored the arguments made by climate deniers — they’ve tested and rejected each of them.
Understanding the Endangerment Finding Two requirements must be met before a substance can be regulated under the Clean Air Act. Others have to be designated by EPA under various provisions of the statute, depending on the type of substance and regulation at issue. First, it has to qualify as an air pollutant.
Its a much dirtier fuel than natural gas, let alone renewables, in terms of climatechange and air pollution. Increased deployment of renewables has undoubtedly contributed to the problem, and coal plants have had to contend with tougher pollution regulations over the years. It was fracking.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 126. and non-U.S. Supreme Court. 17-1258 (D.C.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE #130: FEATURED CASE. and non-U.S.
Trump as their 45th President – a man who famously described climatechange as “ created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. Critically, while he is most vocal against climatechange he is no strong supporter of environmental policy in general. manufacturing non-competitive.” And finally, George W.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content