This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Sea level rise presents numerous climate justice issues. Some of the venues where people are addressing the injustices of climatechange are UN climate negotiations, the courts, and community organizing efforts around the world. Climate justice research can help inform these conversations.
On March 29, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on States obligations regarding climatechange. ii) Peoples and individuals of the present and future generations affected by the adverse effects of climatechange?
For the first time, the International Court of Justice (ICJ)—the world’s highest court—may be ruling on climatechange. On March 29, the UN General Assembly will vote on a resolution to bring climatechange before the ICJ.
A new wave of cases differs from traditional environmental lawsuits by highlighting the connections between preserving the Amazon and the climate, the grave risk of greenhouse gas emissions caused by deforestation, and the critical role of the forest as a major global carbon sink. The timing of these climate disputes is not accidental.
Deadly heatwaves, extreme drought, food and water shortages, catastrophic flooding, rapidly intensifying tropical storms, raging wildfires—around the world, climatechange is exacerbating extreme conditions and their harsh toll on people and ecosystems. The fearsome toll of climate impacts is already clear, leading U.N.
This past week, I attended the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) meeting in Hangzhou, China. In previous posts, Ive explained what the IPCC is, why this assessment cycle is crucial , and highlighted its role in climate action. Whats Next for the IPCC? With AR7 now in motion, the real work begins.
Through political shifts and economic tides, the organization has stayed the course. Protecting our blue planet isn’t just a matter of politics; it is our duty—to ourselves, to future generations and to the planet we call home. You can join us in continuing the fight against climatechange. C within reach.
This past week, I attended the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) meeting in Hangzhou, China. In previous posts, Ive explained what the IPCC is, why this assessment cycle is crucial , and highlighted its role in climate action. Whats Next for the IPCC? With AR7 now in motion, the real work begins.
When countries signed on to the 2015 ParisAgreement, they made initial voluntary commitments (the so-called Nationally Determined Contributions or NDCs) to reduce their heat-trapping emissions, and agreed to revisit them every five years to reflect the “highest possible ambition.” (see of the ParisAgreement ).
There’s no logical connection between a belief in authoritarian government, upholding traditional hierarchies, and views about protecting the environment or the reality of climatechange. Thus, the reasons must relate to psychology or political science, not philosophy. In many countries, including the U.S,
When thinking about global emissions, don’t picture an individual—point your finger at powerful corporations, specifically the 88 companies that are largely responsible for climatechange. It can, and must, start now to meet the 2015 ParisAgreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degree C target within reach.
Photo by Mathias Reding on Unsplash Climatechange litigation has finally reached the world’s highest court. On March 29, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the obligations of States with respect to climatechange.
If policymakers can reduce short-term, high-impact heat-trapping gases such as methane we can limit warming and keep the ParisAgreement goals within reach. Of course, we also will have to make sharp cuts in CO2 emissions, the main driver of climatechange. The planet has already warmed 1.1
Losses and damages caused by climatechange to intangible cultural heritage such as Indigenous and local knowledge, and traditional agricultural practices have been vastly underestimated in discussions of ParisAgreement implementation. This needs to change. Cultural heritage impacts underestimated.
Below is a look at what tools are currently being used to facilitate justice for climatechange on an international scale and where those mechanisms are falling short in ensuring transitional justice and a clean future. Unfortunately, when it comes to climatechange, the truth is often obscured.
Together with Scientists for Global Responsibility, we’ve launched a petition demanding that Elsevier and its parent company, RELX, detail their plans to align their business practices with their public commitments to address climatechange. But reining in climatechange requires us to quickly transition away from fossil fuel use.
The core of this gathering is the yearly “conference of parties” (or COP) of the UN Framework Convention on ClimateChange and its related implementing protocols, including the Kyoto Protocol and, most recently, the ParisAgreement. federal climate action wavers or underdelivers. Download as PDF.
Despite all the work, all the dedication, of thousands of people around the world, there’s a good chance we’ll blow past the ParisAgreement’s targets. There would be value in slowing down climatechange even if we can’t change how bad it will ultimately get. Suppose we do miss those targets?
The suit claims that BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Shell, and the American Petroleum Institute misled the public despite clear knowledge that their products cause climatechange. For more than 50 years , the fossil fuel industry has obstructed meaningful climate action. at UMass Amherst.
This week, Circle of Blue reports on how water fits into the upcoming UN ClimateChange Conference. When diplomats and government ministers converge on Glasgow this fall, they hope to rekindle pivotal negotiations on global climate that were dampened during the pandemic. Ingrid Timboe is a co-chair of the water pavilion.
This ruling was released in the context of a surge in climate litigation cases in France and all over world. For France, the “Affaire du Siècle” case was filed in the Administrative Court of Paris in May 2019 by four NGOs against the government for its failure to act on climatechange.
The Decision text of COP26 completed the Rulebook by resolving sticky issues on fundamental norms related to carbon emission markets under Article 6 of the ParisAgreement (PA). Article 6 is central to the ParisAgreement , and to make the Agreement fully operational these issues needed to be resolved.
No serious person is advocating for any large-scale deployment of solar geoengineering or substituting it for other urgent climatechange mitigations, so the shorthand use of “opponent” or “supporter” is itself misleading and pushes voices to extremes. Anyone can float a balloon. Critics believe it is the path to catastrophe.”
This is in total opposition to the US commitment under the ParisAgreement to achieve a 50-52 percent emissions reduction below 2005 levels by 2030, and net-zero by 2050. These projections show that without additional policies or incentives, the US is very much in danger of not meeting our climate goals.
Now the reports driven by these resolutions are beginning to roll in, and while they certainly provide some insight into the fossil fuel industry’s investment in political influence, a sleight of hand is preventing investors from seeing the companies’ full strategy. ExxonMobil Names Names. degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
A federal court in Australia ruled that the government had a “duty of care” toward its young people to protect them from climatechange. The judge used the ParisAgreement as the benchmark for setting the company’s obligations. This shareholder revolt seems to have been unprecedented in the company’s history.
Last year, climate negotiators in Glasgow finalized the ParisAgreement rulebook for international cooperation through carbon markets, clearing the way for the expansion of emissions trading and carbon pricing worldwide. – Emissions trading as part of a portfolio of climate policies. .
Many recent scientific reports—including from the IPCC , UNEP and the IEA —show that we are fast running out of time to make the steep cuts in heat-trapping emissions that would keep the ParisAgreement temperature targets within reach. Yet global fossil fuel production and use continue to expand. Particulate matter (PM2.5)
History of the Case Background to the Claim In April 2021, a group of plaintiffs led by the Czech Climate Litigation Association ( Klimatick aloba R ), and including a municipality and several individuals, filed a case against the central government of the Czech Republic and four subsidiary ministries for their inaction on climatechange.
Recently, the CBC , working with pollster Janet Brown, released the results of its annual spring report card on Alberta’s political and economic well-being. The reality, however, is that climate action and affordability go hand in hand. The research was published in Nature in April of this year. It doesn’t have to be this way.
The Antarctic Ice Sheet faces an uncertain future under climatechange. That would be a devastating situation for coastal communities to deal with, especially for low lying and atoll nations who have been sounding the alarm on climatechange and sea level rise for decades, and are not responsible for rising emissions.
Otherwise national pledges to address climatechange in the spirit of the 2015 ParisAgreement will not build sufficient global trust. This framework requires regular progress reports on pledges to address climatechange. In the past, it has been seen as a technical, data gathering task.
Fossil fuels are the root cause of climatechange, of long-standing environmental injustices, and are also frequently connected to geopolitical strife and violent conflicts. These data are alarming—underscoring how far off track the world continues to be in cutting the heat-trapping emissions fueling climatechange.
Four important global reports released in the last two days set up a deeply sobering context for the upcoming annual international climate talks in Egypt, also called COP27. Source: UN ClimateChange 2022 NDC Synthesis Report. Source: UN ClimateChange 2022 NDC Synthesis Report. The UNEP Emissions Gap Report.
For nearly three decades the United Nations has been bringing together almost every country on Earth for global climate summits known as the “Conference of the Parties”. In that time climatechange has gone from being a fringe issue to a global priority. Let’s hope our political leaders in Glasgow can make that a reality.”.
Solar activity provides no alternative explanation for today’s climatechange Dagsvik and Moen claim that recent research indicates that variations in the sun’s magnetic field are of great importance for long-term fluctuations in solar activity. Our job is to be thorough and verify questionable results. It has taken time.
I’ve just arrived in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, for the 27 th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on ClimateChange—the UN’s annual global climate conference, aka COP27. My UCS colleagues and I are here because global climate policy must be informed by and aligned with the latest science.
It is often hard to make sense of what happens at the annual climate meetings, and easy to get cynical. For two or three weeks, climatepolitics gets intense worldwide news coverage. It’s pretty clear that neither the innermost nor outermost circle has yet achieved much concrete advance in dealing with climatechange.
But after the failed summit in Copenhagen (COP15), climate coverage completely went away for a long period of time. After Paris, it dropped and then plateaued due to the signing of the ParisAgreement. Climate coverage seems to be hitting an all-time high again but this time will it keep its momentum post-Glasgow? .
What is needed to make the ParisAgreement a success? But if there is no system to ensure that they are monitored and evaluated, the agreement will have very shaky legs. But if there is no system to ensure that they are monitored and evaluated, the agreement will have very shaky legs. 2] Huitema, D., Van Asselt, H.,
At COP27 this November in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, a call to action to shift all capital for climate came into the spotlight. C) of the ParisAgreement has significant implications for how the global financial system works and will be a centrepiece of the coming years. C) of the ParisAgreement. Article 2.1(C)
Resilience offers a forward-looking approach to corporate climate action and energy transition strategy. By Bernice Lee Following the ParisAgreement, corporate enthusiasm for climate action surged, with net-zero commitments and the energy transition taking a central role in both government and business agendas.
If all politics are local, but greenhouse gases find their way into the atmosphere’s international space, how can the global community act collectively on climatechange? At COP21 in December, the current 196 UNFCCC parties will decide if they can sign on to this new paradigm of international climatechange regulation.
These annual meetings are huge media events — understandably, since they are the highest-level international event on climatechange, even if this over-states their importance relative to other ongoing work — but there was a strange vagueness, and near-silence, in reporting on this COP. But this year was different.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content