This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Accelerating risks from climatechange are colliding with shortcomings in insurance markets—such as a lack of transparent information and affordability provisions—to create a perfect storm for people and communities on the front lines of floods, droughts, and wildfires. Many of these disasters bear the fingerprints of climatechange.
The next week has the potential to bring important developments for international governance of marine carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Even if the resolution is adopted, it would not be binding in the same way as a formal international agreement, but it could still impact how countries regulate marine CDR. seaweed) for carbon storage.
Fossil fuel companies are well established as founts of disinformation , agents of obstruction, and drivers of climatechange. Taken together, the need for governments to meaningfully regulate these super polluters has never been clearer. What is an advisory opinion?
Our new report outlines a framework for building a more responsible battery supply chain, drawing insights from the European Unions Sustainable Batteries Regulation (2023). Refining processes , particularly in countries with lax environmental regulations, emit greenhouse gases and toxic waste.
To deliver on this goal, the federal government made important investments in renewable energy projects. Yet, reaching net zero also means phasing out polluting fossil fuel energy, so the government developed rules to impose a pollution limit on electricity producers. Lets have a look. GW in 2023.
Statement by Alienor Rougeot, Senior Program Manager, Climate and Energy, on Ontario’s claims regarding the federal Clean Electricity Regulations. The federal government’s proposed regulations to reduce emissions in electricity generation are achievable without breaking the bank.
Eagle County , has important implications for issues such as whether NEPA covers climatechange impacts. In addition, the impact statement was governed by the 1970 version of NEPA and the 1978 White House NEPA regulations. The case, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. The facts are quite unusual.
Statement from Aly Hyder Ali, Oil and Gas Program Manager, Environmental Defence Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People – We welcome the Government of Canada’s Oil and Gas Greenhouse Gas Pollution Cap draft regulation, which aims to curb pollution from the oil and gas industry.
But what makes the case important is the courts use of hard look judicial review, which environmentalists have often used to attack bad regulations. It helped create the framework for regulating pesticides and upheld the use of a precautionary approach rather than requiring EPA to have definitive evidence. v.EPA (1975). EPA (2012 ).
We at the UCS Center for Science and Democracy work to make sure that government decisions are informed by the best possible science and evidence, free from political interference, and responsive to diverse community voices. You can find more information about the process of submitting public comments here.
Prime Minister Trudeaus recent decision to prorogue Parliament and announce his upcoming resignation may have left you wondering about what this could mean for climatechange policy. All political leaders should be bolder on climate. It is unlikely that the government will last long once Parliament resumes.
The problem is that focusing on the challenges of litigation risks overlooking the second RoN strategy, one that may prove much more important in the USA over time — RoN through Governance. Instead, national legislation has created a governance structure for a forest, river, and lagoon. But, even here, the challenge remains.
Thats why I believe the Climate Accountability Act is a critical step for Wisconsin, especially given all the ways the federal government is trying to move us backward on addressing climatechange. the federal government is trying to move us backwards on addressing climatechange.
Someone asked me recently what I thought law schools should be teaching about climatechange. Naturally, my first reaction is that everyone everywhere needs to put climatechange at the top of their agenda. Land use law is another subject that may be transformed by climatechange.
This may seem like a setback for climate progress in Canada, but it simply underscores the limits of voluntary initiatives and the need for the government to enforce climate-aligned financial regulations. Four of our largest banks have recently withdrawn from the UN-backed Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA).
Following are some of my key takeaways (detailed in this and another forthcoming report) about the appropriate role of emissions trading in climatechange policy and general thoughts on improving the effectiveness of carbon markets. – Emissions trading as part of a portfolio of climate policies. Implications for China.
Overly focusing on technological innovation will miss the basic changes needed to drive the clean energy transition at scale and at pace today, including required breakthroughs on collaboration, collective action, communication, governance, and business model reforms. People can no longer deny climatechange must be addressed.
On March 29, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on States obligations regarding climatechange. ii) Peoples and individuals of the present and future generations affected by the adverse effects of climatechange?
Treaty 6 Territory | Edmonton – After two years of tireless work by Indigenous communities, environmental organizations, and the public demanding governments hold Imperial Oil accountable for its egregious behaviour, the AER has finally laid charges against the company. Background: The Imperial Oil tailings disaster allowed 5.3
New methane satellites provide a powerful data capability for governments who want to demonstrate leadership in climate policy. The report is intended to help policymakers harness satellite data to improve their climate policies, enforce emissions regulations, and accelerate methane reduction efforts.
Short-Changing Michigan Local Governments Has Resulted in Deteriorating Water Systems and Other Services. It means that vulnerable systems are even more at risk in a changingclimate. The federal government passed the Clean Water Act in 1972, and spending on drinking water and wastewater systems skyrocketed.
The fossil fuel industry has known for decades that its products cause climatechang e Contrary to what the fossil fuel industry would like you to believe, the link between burning fossil fuels and climatechange has been well established for decades.
The prospect of climate interventions, particularly SAI, might offer large reductions in climate-change risks that are not possible through emissions cuts, adaptations, or atmospheric removals alone, but also raise serious new uncertainties, risks, and governance challenges. Could this activity change the climate?
CLEE published excerpts from the 922 page Project 2025 document related to climatechange and environment, here. As the Paper states: The Heritage Foundation’s Schedule F proposal would change the current system dramatically.
Thats why I was happy to partner with Environmental Defence and use my platform to promote renewable energy, action against climatechange, and our most valuable resource: wide open untouched, healthy nature. For winter athletes, climatechange poses existential risks to doing what they love.
The argument is that the Board shouldn’t have to consider that because EPA has authority to regulate air pollution, not the Board. Yet would anyone say that the government should therefore ignore the risk of a lab accident. Other agencies may have jurisdiction over disease control.
UN Photo/ICJ-CIJ/ Frank van Beek This blog post is Part 3 of a three-part series highlighting the main legal arguments presented during the hearings of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the request for an advisory opinion regarding the obligations of States with respect to climatechange.
Most climate action today rightly focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately, these efforts are necessary, but not sufficient to meet global climate targets. The Sabin Center has previously discussed the regulation of OAE here and here. In Washington State, certain state laws regulate ocean resources.
But the federal government in the United States has failed to address it so far. Aviation is a significant and growing source of greenhouse gas emissions. Opponents will undoubtedly argue that such state-based initiatives conflict with federal law.
County of Monterey –a major case involving the authority of California local governments to limit oil and gas development within their borders. County of Monterey case raises important and difficult questions for both the justices and the Executive Branch of California state government.
But such a question is not an optimal proxy for a sea level rise hazard disclosure because FEMA’s maps only reflect past flood experience rather than “ the degree to which climatechange and sea-level rise are expected to heighten the risk of flooding and expand the areas that will be subject to flooding in the future.”
Statement by Aly Hyder Ali, Oil and Gas Program Manager Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People –We welcome the analysis released today from Environment and ClimateChange Canada on the economic impacts of the consumer fuel charge and the industrial carbon pricing mechanism.
The fossil fuel industry has long been the main driver of climatechange, but Big Oil’s CEOs and profiteers would like you to believe that it is a part of the solution. Environmental Defence has been calling on the federal government to stand up to Big Oil and hold the fossil fuel industry accountable for its pollution.
There are three interlinked reasons for the change. Climatechange. The key to getting climatechange under control is to rapidly decrease the user of fossil fuels. The resulting government policies are forcing radical change on the energy system of a kind not seen in a century or more.
That would be the straw man erected by defenders of the fossil fuel industry who claim that facing climatechange is a doctrinaire liberal policy. This year, many on the far-right are attempting to rebrand Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing as “woke capitalism.” Liberate” is the operative word here.
The ups: on April 6 th , Pinterest announced a new policy to keep “false and misleading claims around climatechange off the platform.” It’s hard to say Musk’s ownership will mean for Twitter’s policies about lying about climatechange and other vital social issues, but some early commenters are skeptical.
One post focused on the federal government’s successful criminal prosecution of a San Joaquin Valley water district manager who illegally diverted millions of gallons of water from the government’s Central Valley Project for more than two decades.
It also wants to destroy environmental regulation, especially climate law. There’s no logical connection between a belief in authoritarian government, upholding traditional hierarchies, and views about protecting the environment or the reality of climatechange. That’s not a coincidence.
In a transformative moment for European and global climate litigation, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled today that the state has a positive duty to adopt, and effectively implement in practice, regulations and measures capable of mitigating the existing and potentially irreversible future effects of climatechange.
A new Sabin Center report explores the laws governing seaweed cultivation and sinking for CDR in Alaska. There are a number of co-benefits to seaweed projects, in addition to their climatechange mitigation potential. Seaweed cultivation and sinking are regulated by a number of different laws at the state and federal levels.
Climatechange in California isn’t a future threat; we are already dealing with extreme drought and destructive wildfires. This proposal would support both zero- emission vehicle incentive programs and charging infrastructure investments while complementing existing regulations on clean vehicles. What does Proposition 30 do?
Louder calls to accelerate the energy transition, advances in climate litigation, and shareholder activism pushed many governments and financial institutions around the world to acknowledge the need for transparency regarding climate-related financial risk.
Statement by Emilia Belliveau, Energy Transition Program Manager Montréal/Tiohtià:ke | Traditional, unceded lands of the Kanien’kehá:ka/Mohawk Nation, a gathering place for many First Nations, including the Anishinaabeg – We are disappointed that the Government of Alberta is attacking the federal government’s attempts to clamp down on greenwashing.
Founded in 1871, the National Association of Insurance Commission represents insurance regulators in all fifty states. However, the group has just issued a new “voluntary” survey for insurance companies about climate risks. Voluntary” is in quotes because about 80% of the insurance market is regulated by states that mandate the survey.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content