This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Policymakers and regulators must act quickly because the market is not going to solve this problem on its own, and its definitely not going to do it in a way that protects low- and middle-income people. State insurance regulators sought more than 70 data points. An anonymized subset of the data was shared with FIO.
A new dataset released by InfluenceMap provides information on heat-trapping emissions traced to the 122 largest investor and state-owned fossilfuel companies in the world. Fossilfuels are the main driver of climatechange and the terrifying effects of it that we see happening across the world.
The fossilfuel industry has long been the main driver of climatechange, but Big Oil’s CEOs and profiteers would like you to believe that it is a part of the solution. One of the people peddling this idea is the man behind Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) – Murray Edwards, the FossilFuel Fanatic.
Scientists are sounding the alarm because this warming is shockingly bigbigger than what we would have expected given the long-term warming trend from fossilfuel-caused climatechange. According to recent data from NOAAs National Center for Environmental Information, 2024 is likely to be even warmer than 2023.
Accelerating risks from climatechange are colliding with shortcomings in insurance markets—such as a lack of transparent information and affordability provisions—to create a perfect storm for people and communities on the front lines of floods, droughts, and wildfires. Many of these disasters bear the fingerprints of climatechange.
In an important win for climate accountability in the United States, the US Supreme Court decided that lawsuits filed in Colorado, Maryland, California, Hawai’i, and Rhode Island against fossilfuel companies including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, Suncor, and others will remain in state courts.
Thats why I believe the Climate Accountability Act is a critical step for Wisconsin, especially given all the ways the federal government is trying to move us backward on addressing climatechange. the federal government is trying to move us backwards on addressing climatechange.
Production and combustion of fossilfuels imposes enormous costs on society, which the industry doesn’t pay for. I want to talk about some options for using the tax system to change that. A more promising alternative might be a clean-up tax on the fossilfuel industry. Download as PDF.
But this new study from my colleagues working on climatechange and fossilfuel accountability couldn’t be ignored. In short, the study concludes that fossilfuel companies are in part to blame for the extraordinary damages resulting from western wildfires (including those sparked by utilities).
And we know that as our climate warms further—driven by burning fossilfuels—the risk of large wildfires will only grow. This alarming finding clarifies the significant role and responsibility of fossilfuel companies to not only stop their harm moving forward, but also to address damage they have already done.
Fossilfuel companies are well established as founts of disinformation , agents of obstruction, and drivers of climatechange. Taken together, the need for governments to meaningfully regulate these super polluters has never been clearer. What is an advisory opinion?
is a serious blow to the EPA’s ability to fight climatechange—and could have dangerous repercussions beyond this case. The timing of the decision feels especially harsh, as the nation is in the throes of the “ Danger Season ” for hazards such as heat waves, drought, wildfires and hurricanes, all worsened by climatechange.
The regulator can only be effective if it is independent from the industries it oversees. The regulator can only be effective if it is independent from the industries it oversees. The AER has consistently failed to fulfill its mandate to ensure safe, environmentally responsible energy development.
Yet, reaching net zero also means phasing out polluting fossilfuel energy, so the government developed rules to impose a pollution limit on electricity producers. The rules, known as the Clean Electricity Regulations (CER), were finalized in December 2024. So, do they do the job? Lets have a look. GW in 2023.
Special session takes on big oil and wins The transition to clean transportation and away from fossilfuels is here. While this is an inevitable part of the transition to clean transportation, and generally good news for the climate and impacted communities, the oil industry will not go down easily.
Prime Minister Trudeaus recent decision to prorogue Parliament and announce his upcoming resignation may have left you wondering about what this could mean for climatechange policy. All political leaders should be bolder on climate. Last month we polled Canadians to see what kind of climate action people want to see.
The multiple perspectives in the fuller picture have to be on the minds of electricity sector decision makers, from the prospective project proponents to the public utility commissioners and environmental regulators in charge of assessing a project on behalf of the public. And we don’t need to have all the answers to make a difference.
It means committing to incentives and standards that clearly align with the trajectory we need to be on across all sectors of the economy—both valuing the beneficial aspects of clean energy resources, and accounting for the negative effects of polluting fossilfuels. People can no longer deny climatechange must be addressed.
Statement from Aly Hyder Ali, Oil and Gas Program Manager, Environmental Defence Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People – We welcome the Government of Canada’s Oil and Gas Greenhouse Gas Pollution Cap draft regulation, which aims to curb pollution from the oil and gas industry.
This includes sponsoring sports teams and athletes in an attempt to improve their image, particularly in the face of growing calls for climate action. The fossilfuel industry has known that its products are fueling the climate crisis for decades.
Statement by Alienor Rougeot, Senior Program Manager, Climate and Energy, on Ontario’s claims regarding the federal Clean Electricity Regulations. The federal government’s proposed regulations to reduce emissions in electricity generation are achievable without breaking the bank.
Have you ever wondered why progress on climatechange is so slow despite widespread public support for climate action? How often does the fossilfuel industry try to influence the government’s climate policy decisions? If any of these questions have ever crossed your mind, then I have great news for you!
This decision , reached with a 6-3 majority led by Chief Justice John Roberts, marks a significant shift in administrative law and has profound implications for environmental regulations and climate accountability. Successful court cases could limit the scope of future regulations. Worse, agencies may decide not to even try.
Some estimates suggest they could disappear by 2030 due to the climatechange triggered by human fossilfuel use, which began less than 200 years ago. Glaciers, once thought of as static, timeless icons, have become a fleeting phenomenon, highlighting the urgent need for action on climatechange.
This is essential, because scientific monitoring efforts suggest that for all emissions sources, the actual emissions are higher than what countries are reporting to the United Nations Framework Convention on ClimateChange in their own emissions inventories. But still, much more action is needed. Science shows that keeping the 1.5
If passed into law, the bill would be a valuable step toward limiting misinformation about fossilfuels and countering greenwashing. The fossilfuel industry has a long and well documented history of denying climate science and funding advertising campaigns to greenwash oil and gas.
This may seem like a setback for climate progress in Canada, but it simply underscores the limits of voluntary initiatives and the need for the government to enforce climate-aligned financial regulations. This news also coincides with Mark Carneys official entrance into the Liberal Party leadership race.
So add this to the growing list of decisions allowing local regulation of fossilfuel facilities. The post Local Regulation of FossilFuel Pipelines (or The Little City That Could) first appeared on Law and the Environment.
As electric vehicle charging stations sprout like mushrooms along our roads and clusters of new wind turbines come online, these two clean energy solutions to the climate crisis are becoming more commonplace. Also more commonplace are the obvious , dangerous , and destructive effects of climatechange on people and communities.
CARB’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) seeks to incentivize the production and sale of alternative, lower emissions transportation fuels in order to displace conventional fossilfuels. To identify which fuels should be promoted, CARB calculates the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from transportation fuels.
Yet, this enforcement does not change the need for urgent regulatory reform in Alberta. It is not the job of impacted communities and their allies to police the regulator. Albertans need a regulator that lives up to its mandate: protecting the environment and public health rather than working for corporate interests.
Standing based on climate impacts C. Climate science F. Climate justice II. EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act (CAA) A. Climatechange under other federal statutes. Climatechange as substantial impact requiring discussion in environmental impact statement.
Though the case caught fewer headlines, it, too, threatened Earth-shifting implications all its own by thrusting into question a critical EPA lever for addressing climatechange. First and foremost, despite some fossilfuel interests swinging for the fossilfuel-favored fences, the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v.
Of course, we also will have to make sharp cuts in CO2 emissions, the main driver of climatechange. Methane emissions come from two main sources : fossilfuels and agriculture—primarily animal-based agriculture. At COP27, 636 registered attendees are lobbyists for the fossilfuel industry.
On this final day of COP28, just a few hours after countries of the world agreed on the need to move away from fossilfuels, I’m overcome with a mix of emotions. Gratitude to the people in the climate and Indigenous rights movement, who have been pushing for this outcome for years.
UN Photo/ICJ-CIJ/ Frank van Beek This blog post is Part 3 of a three-part series highlighting the main legal arguments presented during the hearings of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the request for an advisory opinion regarding the obligations of States with respect to climatechange.
That would be the straw man erected by defenders of the fossilfuel industry who claim that facing climatechange is a doctrinaire liberal policy. One group that has filed resolutions in the past is the far-right National Center for Public Policy Research, which fossilfuel companies including ExxonMobil have funded.
Canada’s big five banks are deservedly feeling more heat lately about their funding of fossilfuels. They are among the worst in the world, pumping $727 billion into fossilfuels since the Paris Agreement was signed, while scoring among the lowest on having policies to rectify this.
Though reducing methane emissions is critical to tackling the climate crisis, these measures aren’t expensive for companies to pay for. In addition, we already have regulations in place to achieve methane reductions, so we are essentially subsidizing compliance with existing rules.
A big shift to renewables could leave stranded assets — existing fossilfuel plants that the utility will no longer get paid for using. In much of the country, those wholesale transactions are under the control of regional transmission organizations established by federal power regulators, but that’s not true everywhere.
Minnesotans are facing concurrent crises of climatechange, high energy prices and inflation, and the inequitable public health impacts of fossilfuel air pollution. Getting energy from where it’s produced to where it’s needed. Unlocking the gridlock for Minnesota’s renewable energy future.
Trading in disinformation In its climate lobbying report, ExxonMobil deemed 52 associations “aligned” for acknowledging the risks of climatechange, publicly backing the Paris Agreement goal of limiting average global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius and taking steps to reduce carbon emissions.
Now the reports driven by these resolutions are beginning to roll in, and while they certainly provide some insight into the fossilfuel industry’s investment in political influence, a sleight of hand is preventing investors from seeing the companies’ full strategy. The organization received between $2.5
Our video, Clean Pathway to Future, acknowledges the Canadian public’s concerns about climatechange and affordability, highlights how the fossilfuel industry is making climatechange worse, and debunks carbon capture and storage for the trojan horse of continued oil and gas production that it is.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content