This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The fossilfuel industry has long been the main driver of climatechange, but Big Oil’s CEOs and profiteers would like you to believe that it is a part of the solution. One of the people peddling this idea is the man behind Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) – Murray Edwards, the FossilFuel Fanatic.
While there are thousands of people here in Dubai at COP28 fighting for genuine change, the climate summit is facing a barrage of disinformation. Combatting climatechange has never been more urgent, and COP28 is poised to advance critical global action. What’s lacking is political will.
Earlier this year, The Guardian ran a powerful article exposing the ties of Elsevier, one of the world’s largest academic publishing companies, to the fossilfuel industry. The article caught my attention because I’d never considered the ways in which an academic publisher might be perpetuating and enabling a fossilfuel economy.
The destruction caused by climatechange is directly linked to human activity, primarily burning fossilfuels. There are multiple realistic, tangible solutions that would rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions worldwide, yet policy addressing anthropogenic climatechange remains slow and insufficient.
In an important win for climate accountability in the United States, the US Supreme Court decided that lawsuits filed in Colorado, Maryland, California, Hawai’i, and Rhode Island against fossilfuel companies including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, Suncor, and others will remain in state courts.
Prime Minister Trudeaus recent decision to prorogue Parliament and announce his upcoming resignation may have left you wondering about what this could mean for climatechange policy. All political leaders should be bolder on climate. Climate is set to be a key differentiating issue in the upcoming election.
In this case, the bills would allow states to secure funds from fossilfuel companies for the costs of adaptation, mitigation, and cleanup of damages caused by their emissions. This Climate Superfund Fund would be created in the State Treasury. This polluter-pays model is based upon the federal Superfund Program.
Production and combustion of fossilfuels imposes enormous costs on society, which the industry doesn’t pay for. I want to talk about some options for using the tax system to change that. One option, a tax on carbon dioxide emissions, gets the most attention but seems politically impossible. Download as PDF.
And those on the frontlines of these disasters need emergency help immediately, as well as climate resilience investments to protect them from future impacts we’ve already locked in. There isn’t a place on the planet that is immune to the climate-caused extremes we are witnessing today. That can and must change NOW.
As the climate crisis deepens, so does the urgency to hold fossilfuel companies accountable for decades of deception. As the fossilfuel industry spares no expense to obscure these truths, the work of scientists who engage with climate litigation is increasingly vital.
is a serious blow to the EPA’s ability to fight climatechange—and could have dangerous repercussions beyond this case. The timing of the decision feels especially harsh, as the nation is in the throes of the “ Danger Season ” for hazards such as heat waves, drought, wildfires and hurricanes, all worsened by climatechange.
For the first time, the International Court of Justice (ICJ)—the world’s highest court—may be ruling on climatechange. On March 29, the UN General Assembly will vote on a resolution to bring climatechange before the ICJ.
I feel like climatechange is going to have to get worse before it gets better. Climatechange has been a big, scary, looming problem for basically the entirety of my life; I cannot remember a time when it was not at least a background concern. This holiday season, I’m especially grateful for their tone of determination.
Fossilfuel companies are well established as founts of disinformation , agents of obstruction, and drivers of climatechange. We draw attention to the outsized role that a small number of business enterprises have had in driving climatechange and obstructing action.
By Dan Gearino, ICN Staff In a year of record-setting heat, intensifying extreme weather and a bitterly partisan presidential election in which climatechange was almost never mentioned, the transition away from fossilfuels made significant progress that was still not nearly enough.
A new UCS report found that the oil and gas industry has spent massive amounts of money in Colorado to buy political influence and block public health and environmental safeguards.
Though they probably meant well, it’s offensive—misogynist even— to suggest that Taylor Swift has nothing more to contribute to the climate movement than a date. You could argue that writing about climatechange would be a departure from Swift’s usual topics of relationships and romance, which frankly is a sexist and untrue take.
The IPCC compiles scientific insights on climatechange, informing policymakers and the public about risks and possible actions. In essence, combined with climate models, they provide a way to envision the consequences of different actions or inactions. What Are Future Climate Scenarios?
Also like a sine graph, Union of Concerned Scientists will keep moving forward no matter what (and backward technically, but I am political science major and way out of my depth here, so let’s pretend they only move forward, give me kudos for an awesome simile, and get to the recap!). Much like a sine graph , this year had highs and lows.
Since the summer of 2021, five Republican-controlled state legislatures have passed bills banning their state governments from doing business with financial institutions that they allege have divested from fossilfuel companies as a result of ESG investment policies. Another six statehouses are considering similar bills.
Through political shifts and economic tides, the organization has stayed the course. Protecting our blue planet isn’t just a matter of politics; it is our duty—to ourselves, to future generations and to the planet we call home. You can join us in continuing the fight against climatechange.
The image that comes to mind when I think of fossilfuel villains is Batman’s adversary Two-Face. To be two-faced is to be deceitful, and deception is what the fossilfuel industry executives excel in. What is ESG? ” Kentucky officials are not doing this alone, it is part of a coordinated effort.
(For a deeper dive on what’s really going on here in Egypt, check out the Climate Action Against Disinformation’s website.). A small number of big corporations are responsible for the climate crisis. The best solution: Replace fossilfuels with renewable energy. This is not news, but it’s worth repeating.
Have you ever wondered why progress on climatechange is so slow despite widespread public support for climate action? How often does the fossilfuel industry try to influence the government’s climate policy decisions? If any of these questions have ever crossed your mind, then I have great news for you!
As Gernot Wagner puts it in ‘ Geoengineering: the Gamble ’: “The decision is all about risk-risk tradeoffs” He urges us to put the risks of potentially pursuing solar geoengineering against “the risks of unmitigated climatechange.” The National Academy of Sciences adopted a ’risk-risk’ framing in its 2021 report.
In an unforeseen turn of events, a pivotal climate litigation case unfolded in Montana , where 16 young environmental advocates challenged the state’s fossilfuel policies. Climate litigation emphasized addressing current and past harms, with a spotlight on Loss and Damage. A new focus: Fossilfuel phaseout cases.
This past week, I attended the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) meeting in Hangzhou, China. In previous posts, Ive explained what the IPCC is, why this assessment cycle is crucial , and highlighted its role in climate action. Whats Next for the IPCC? With AR7 now in motion, the real work begins.
The climate crisis is one of humanity’s most complex conflicts yet. The dangerous impacts of a warming, fossil-fuel dependent world span from wildfires capable of destroying entire towns to cancer-causing air pollution that afflicts the next generation. Unfortunately, when it comes to climatechange, the truth is often obscured.
Of course, we also will have to make sharp cuts in CO2 emissions, the main driver of climatechange. Methane emissions come from two main sources : fossilfuels and agriculture—primarily animal-based agriculture. At COP27, 636 registered attendees are lobbyists for the fossilfuel industry.
This wasn’t the first of these summits – but it was the first one that focused on the concrete actions governments are taking to phase out fossilfuels. We heard world leader after world leader say what has been only an elephant in the room until now – that we must phase out fossilfuels. It’s not complicated.
To begin with, there are the health benefits of the energy transition away from fossilfuels. Limiting climatechange will itself protect ecosystems and biodiversity around the world. It will limit the environmental harms caused by producing and transporting millions of tons of fossilfuels.
A Montana state district court has issued its long-awaited decision in a major climatechange case brought by Montana children against state officials. Judge Seeley did so after presiding over a two-week, non-jury trial in June 2023–the first such climatechange trial in U.S. In Held v. legal history.
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) recently released its sixth assessment of climatechange, comprised of three separate reports presenting the latest science on climatechange, related impacts, adaptation, vulnerability , and mitigation at a time when more and more people are pressing for climate action.
Climatechange could hike the cost of maintaining Ontario ’s transportation infrastructure by over $1.5 We work together to produce news and information about the impact of climatechange, pollution, and aging infrastructure on the Great Lakes and drinking water. Laura Gersony, Fresh Editor. This Week’s Watersheds.
This past week, I attended the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) meeting in Hangzhou, China. In previous posts, Ive explained what the IPCC is, why this assessment cycle is crucial , and highlighted its role in climate action. Whats Next for the IPCC? With AR7 now in motion, the real work begins.
Earlier this month at COP28 countries committed to transitioning off of fossilfuels and massively scaling up renewable energy instead. So you’re excused if, like me, you’re baffled by Minister Freeland’s first move in the wake of COP28: a giant new fossilfuel subsidy, via the new Canada Growth Fund.
While there is enormous potential for UN climate negotiations to transform climate action, meaningful progress has been delayed in part by the fossilfuel industry’s deceptive tactics. Last year’s COP was notable as the first to explicitly mention “fossilfuels” in the final decision document.
Minnesotans are facing concurrent crises of climatechange, high energy prices and inflation, and the inequitable public health impacts of fossilfuel air pollution. Getting energy from where it’s produced to where it’s needed. Unlocking the gridlock for Minnesota’s renewable energy future.
Sea level rise presents numerous climate justice issues. Some of the venues where people are addressing the injustices of climatechange are UN climate negotiations, the courts, and community organizing efforts around the world. Climate justice research can help inform these conversations.
Since starting with Environmental Defence in January, I’ve been grappling with an updated version of those song lyrics: “Why we must talk about climatechange when everything is burning?” Given the human cost of climatechange, you might think that talking about it while it is ravishing our nation would be easy.
The article surveys a range of criticisms of the use of carbon taxes as a tool to address greenhouse gas emissions, and criticisms of the focus of many economists on carbon taxes as the primary tool to address climatechange. I think these political constraints are a key reason economists focused so long – too long – on carbon pricing.
The Liberals had done as little as possible to address climatechange. So the change in government is more than welcome. The outgoing Liberals weren’t helped electorally by their foot-dragging about climatechange. Polling showed broad public support for more aggressive cuts in carbon emissions.
They combined their expertise in climate science, science history, and document analysis to create a perfect blend of scientific analysis and socially relevant research. Their internal research estimated that scientists would be able to link rising temperatures to the burning of fossilfuels sometime between 1995 and 2005.
Now the reports driven by these resolutions are beginning to roll in, and while they certainly provide some insight into the fossilfuel industry’s investment in political influence, a sleight of hand is preventing investors from seeing the companies’ full strategy. ExxonMobil Names Names.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content