This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Paris, like many coastal cities in the US such as San Francisco, has a combined sewer system where after heavy rain events, pipes get overwhelmed and raw sewage can flow into nearby waters. EPA Supreme Court decision undermining the CleanWaterAct and eroding the EPA’s ability to enforce it.
Why might we have an environmental review statute such as NEPA when we already have a range of other environmental protection statutes such as the Clean Air Act, the CleanWaterAct, and more? The first post is here. What does NEPA do that these other statutes are not already doing?
Moreover, Alaskas coastal waters are more vulnerable to acidification than those in lower latitudes, making aquaculture particularly beneficial in this region. Seaweed cultivation and sinking are regulated by a number of different laws at the state and federal levels. EPA may regulate seaweed sinking under the MPRSA.
The Sabin Center has previously discussed the regulation of OAE here and here. A new Sabin Center report continues the conversation by focusing on the regulation of OAE in Washington State. Washington States waters Washington State has a rich marine ecosystem, and a vibrant commercial and recreational shellfish industry.
Supreme Court Narrowly Construes Permitting Program Under the CleanWaterAct, Limiting EPAs Authority By Stuart Silverman On March 4, 2025, in City and County of San Francisco v. Those requirements were contrary to the effluent limitations approach mandated by Congress when it enacted the Act.
Recently, a coalition of environmental groups brought suit against the EPA for their lack of CleanWaterAct (CWA) oversight surrounding CAFOs. The lax state regulations allow CAFOs to dump phosphorus into waterways, resulting in water quality issues such as cyanobacteria blooms in Lake Champlain.
But it is feasible to predict given current regulations and economic demands in the area a range for how much land might be developed, and the general location where that development might occur. As a general rule, for indirect effects, aggregate effects will generally be more tractable and foreseeable than site-specific effects.
Meet Nature Renaissance Man George Gress; Celebrate Migratory Bird Day May 10 With TNC -- WHYY: Philly DA Launches Cleaner, Greener Enforcement Unit To Target Illegal Dumping, Other Quality-of-Life Crimes -- York Daily Record: Federal Judge Finds Modern Landfill Violated CleanWaterAct 419 Times In York County -- WITF/StateImpactPA - Rachel McDevitt: (..)
But the problem with this pronouncement is that the 100 accomplishments were achieved by an EPA operating with full funding, full staffing and a full complement of regulations over the past several years. In addition to all of this, he intends to revoke many of EPAs regulations. Zeldins leadership. Click Here for a copy of the letter.
. -- DEP published notice in the January 18 PA Bulletin inviting comments on new and revised DEP Water Quality Assessment Methodology for listing and delisting impaired waters under the federal CleanWaterAct 2026 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report. Read more here.
These include the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, the CleanWaterAct, the Rivers and Harbors Act, and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. As the report released today shows, a number of U.S. federal laws impose permit and other requirements applicable to marine CDR projects.
Until recently, the contents of an EIS report were outlined in regulations issued by the Council on Environmental Quality (“CEQ”), the agency tasked with administering NEPA. However, following a series of court rulings from late 2024 and early 2025, CEQ has rescinded all of its NEPA-implementing regulations. Infrastructure Coal.
The Environmental Protection Agency created the term “Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation”, (CAFO) as part of a regulatory scheme for enforcing the CleanWaterAct. Despite the tremendous harm that CAFOs do, the federal government does not effectively regulate methane emissions from CAFOs. Then, the D.C.
To address this problem, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a suite of important regulations. In April of 2024, the EPA introduced new Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for PFAS in drinking water, signaling a critical regulatory shift. Why Are Federal Regulations Necessary to Regulate PFAS?
There are, however, significant questions as to how that research will be regulated under domestic (U.S.) One key question relates to federal preemption and state authority, namely do federal laws preempt state regulation, and, if not, to what extent can states regulate OAE activities? and more is planned.
Meet Nature Renaissance Man George Gress; Celebrate Migratory Bird Day May 10 With TNC -- WHYY: Philly DA Launches Cleaner, Greener Enforcement Unit To Target Illegal Dumping, Other Quality-of-Life Crimes -- York Daily Record: Federal Judge Finds Modern Landfill Violated CleanWaterAct 419 Times In York County -- WITF/StateImpactPA - Rachel McDevitt: (..)
With respect to drinking water, risk insurers have estimated that cleaning up 30 PFAS chemicals currently subject to litigation will cost at least $120 billion —an amount roughly equal to the annual U.S. For the mere 6 types of PFAS that EPA has determined to regulate in drinking water, the agency pegs treatment costs at over $1.5
This framework allows state environmental laws passed pursuant to a federal environmental law, like the CleanWaterAct (“CWA”) or Clean Air Act (“CAA”), to have the force and effect of federal law if the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) approves the state implementation plans.
Challenges to the “Narrative Standard” for Toxic Water Pollutants. An existing water quality rule, 15A NCAC 2H.0208, Reasonably necessary to implement or interpret an enactment of the General Assembly, or of Congress, or a regulation of a federal agency…and 4. Clear and unambiguous.
Under that process, NRCS will classify an area as being either a type of wetland, a converted wetland, or an area not subject to Swampbuster regulation. The Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution grants Congress the power “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States.[]” U.S. 3822 (a)(5).
PennVEST funding for water improvement projects originates from a combination of state funds approved by voters, Growing Greener funds, Marcellus Legacy funds from Act 13 drilling impact fees, the federal Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act, federal grant awards to PennVEST from the U.S.
[Deep Cuts Threaten 50 Years Of Progress] We are writing to urge Congress to ensure that EPA has sufficient staff and funding to effectively implement the Clean Air Act, CleanWaterAct, and other bedrock environmental laws for the good of all Americans.
Posted in Circular economy , Corporate sustainability , Plastics Post navigation Previous Previous post: Scouting for Clean Waterways launches nationwide effort to fight plastic pollution Next Next post: WOTUS: A narrowing EPA definition is reshaping the CleanWaterAct Leave a comment Cancel reply This site uses Akismet to reduce spam.
Due to Environmental Protection Agency regulations set by the Obama administration in 2015, and by the Biden administration in 2024, the coal ash disposal site at the Cayuga station was closed, and the ash removed. It is unclear what will happen if those federal regulations are rolled back, but historical precedent gives reason for concern.
The MSGP is a general permit that regulates stormwater discharges from various industrial facilities. On Friday, Dec. 13, 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a proposed draft 2026 Multi-Sector General Permit for Industrial Stormwater Discharges (MSGP).
Led by new public concern about the consequences of industrialization, landmark environmental legislation in the 1970s steadily assured protections for air, water, and wildlands. The administration’s proposal would give mining, logging, transportation, real estate, and agricultural interests free rein to wreck habitat without interference.
This month, in a series of despicable announcements, the EPAs newest senior leader set out to end the federal governments essential role in conserving natural resources and scrubbing poisons from air and water. The statutes that form the foundation of the program, like the 1972 CleanWaterAct, dont seek to close polluting plants.
The so-called No IRIS Act (H.R. Silencing this office would stifle the lifesaving health research that underlies our nations environmental protections, and would result in weaker regulations and higher rates of cancer, birth defects, learning disabilities, and other devastating health consequences, especially for children. 1415 and S.
4 Webinar - Rewild Your Yard: How Meadows Support Pollinators And CleanWater [PaEN] -- Call For Posters: Alliance For The Chesapeake Bay 2025 Chesapeake Watershed Forum Nov. 23 Hard-To-Recycle Collection Events In Allegheny County [PaEN] -- Interfaith Partners For The Chesapeake Bay: Sept. 7, 21, Sept.
To Adopt More Stringent Rules For Oil & Gas Wastewater Injection Wells In Westmoreland County -- Observer-Reporter: EQT Shale Gas Driller Sues Morgan Twp., 7, 21, Sept. 7, 21, Sept.
Because the risks posed by superfund sites pale in comparison to the risks posed by air pollution and broader water pollution issues regulated under the CleanWaterAct, I have been and remain deeply skeptical of the Trump administration’s decision to make Superfund EPA’s core mission.
The CleanWaterAct contains two anti-backsliding provisions. Even when the exceptions apply, though, the permit still must comply with the tougher industry regulations that were in effect when the previous permit was issued. That means that weakening existing regulations loses a lot of its value to industry.
After decades of controversy, the project was vetoed by the EPA in 2008 under the CleanWaterAct. As the Trump administration rolls back EPA regulations, the president has suggested rescinding the agencys authority to use the CleanWaterAct to veto projects.
Despite numerous reports of oil discharges reaching miles long from the vicinity of the facility, the DEP has not yet imposed any required remediation efforts nor any financial penalties for the federal CleanWaterAct violations of Pennsylvania’s Clean Streams Law.
Million -- PA Resources Council To Hold Aug. 23 Hard-To-Recycle Collection Events In Allegheny County [PaEN] -- PA Capital-Star: PA House Passes Bill To Ban Sale, Use Of Firefighting Foam With PFAS ‘Forever Chemicals’ -- WHYY: Philly Schools Delayed Asbestos Inspections And ‘Knowingly’ Failed To Make Repairs: US Dept.
By releasing this draft risk assessment, EPA is providing stakeholders with a rigorous, data and science-driven report that, once finalized it may help the agency determine whether regulating PFOA and PFOS in sewage sludge under the CleanWaterAct is appropriate. and Appendix A.
In 1971 the Clean Air Act was passed and Nixon signed it. In 1972 the CleanWaterAct was passed and Nixon signed it. In 1973 the Endangered Species Act was passed and Nixon signed it. But now, with the benefit of hindsight, I recall that in1969 NEPA was passed and Nixon signed it.
Supreme Court narrows CleanWaterAct discharge permits. And lastly, Democratic senators from western states ask the administration to preserve water funding and staff. He described it as a most unfortunate misstep that rewards an act of judicial hubris and imposes a $2 billion penalty on American taxpayers.
Shankland was one of many speakers at … Continue reading WOTUS: A narrowing EPA definition is reshaping the CleanWaterAct Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) representatives on Wednesday.
If project proponents go back to the drawing board a few times, or experience funding delays, or run afoul of the CleanWaterAct or Endangered Species Act, that all takes place during the NEPA process. The Biden Administration then worked to implement the changes, along with some improvements to the regulations.
Eventually, the company agreed to a $310 million settlement with the federal government for CleanWaterAct violations and to cover the costs of a cleanup and water and health monitoring programs in the community. The are several other settlements pending legal actions brought forward by impacted residents.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content