This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The CleanWaterAct (CWA), one of the nation’s most important environmental laws, is 50 years old today. In virtually all other nations, enforcement of waterpollutioncontrol and other environmental laws is the sole responsibility of government regulators. (credit: Amazon).
This is the first story in a series of reports from the Great Lakes News Collaborative that will investigate contemporary waterpollution challenges in the Great Lakes region. You can think of chloride as a permanent pollutant in the water,” said Christe Alwin of the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy.
And it left Steglitz irritated that he and his staff have to spend so much energy reacting to chemical threats that compromise Ann Arbor’s drinking water. “It’s The CleanWaterAct, a landmark federal pollutioncontrol law passed in 1972, cleaned up American waterways once fouled by industrial waste.
Legal Planet's Richard Frank posted today on the US CleanWaterAct's 50th birthday. The nation’s rivers, streams, lakes and ocean waters are dramatically cleaner and healthier than they were a half-century ago. More on the history of the CleanWaterAct here and here.
On September 12, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a judgment that added another untenable wrinkle in the fabric of groundwater pollution regulation. At first blush, groundwater appears distinct from the federally regulated category of navigable waters. Sierra Club v.
Everybody knows there are straightforward management practices and technologies that could significantly reduce agricultural waterpollution. For fifty years the CleanWaterAct has exempted agriculture from federal regulation and left the problem for the states to regulate.
For example, EPA under the CleanWaterAct established 129 “ Priority Pollutants ” in 1976, a list of which is a typical analytical suite that you can order as a package. CleanWaterAct. Through this law, waterpollution is managed by controlling wastewater discharges.
The tools and technology for achieving that goal in agriculture are well understood and applied with differing levels of authority, commitment, and effectiveness around the world, but not across the United States. a potential solution is chemical technology to scrub harmful algal blooms from lakes. In the U.S.,
The CleanWaterAct requires EPA to revise industry-wide wastewater treatment limits, called effluent limitations guidelines, to keep pace with innovations in pollutioncontroltechnology. Read more here.
Senate Bill 334 / House Bill 76 establish that a person who meets the threshold standing requirements under the federal CleanWaterAct has an unconditional right and the authority to intervene in a civil action initiated by the State in State court to require compliance with certain waterpollutioncontrol measures.
In this issue: Supreme Court dramatically shrinks CleanWaterAct’s reach Biden administration must now rework recent CleanWaterAct regulations. NOAA and EPA – Coastal Nonpoint PollutionControl Program: Proposal To Find That Michigan Has Satisfied Conditions on Earlier Approval.
The CleanWaterAct only requires a permit for discharging pollution into waterbodies, and the Trump EPA argued that discharges into groundwater are never covered by this requirement. Breyer also rejected the opposite view that a permit is required any time it’s possible to trace pollutants into some waterbody.
The CleanWaterAct only requires a permit for discharging pollution into waterbodies, and the Trump EPA argued that discharges into groundwater are never covered by this requirement. Breyer also rejected the opposite view that a permit is required any time it’s possible to trace pollutants into some waterbody.
Over 40 countries pledged to rapidly scale up technologies and policies to achieve a transition away from unabated coal power generation in the 2030s for major economies and in the 2040s globally. billion to the National Science Foundation to start a Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships (TIP). The bill provides $1.52
Supreme Court to hear CleanWaterAct case. White House: President Biden met with the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology after a meeting of the council, which focused on efforts to improve monitoring of greenhouse gas emissions and accelerate innovation in energy technology. International.
billion to the National Science Foundation to start a Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships (TIP). The directorate is tasked with accelerating use-inspired and translational research in technologies and innovations of national importance. Innovation and Competition Act ( S. Innovation and Competition Act ( S.
The report authors argue that the legal requirements of the CleanWaterAct to reduce nutrient levels in the Chesapeake Bay prevent states and the EPA from investing in other approaches to improving the Chesapeake Bay, such as habitat improvement projects. Comments are due by June 12, 2023.
During Regan's confirmation hearing, he committed to pursuing "discharge limits" for PFAS, likely referring to point source discharges of the chemical substances into "waters of the United States." It focuses on three destruction and disposal technologies: thermal treatment, landfilling, and underground injection.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content