Clean Water Act Conservation Regulations 
Circle of Blue
SEPTEMBER 22, 2022
Powerful Industry’s Torrent of Manure Overwhelms State Regulators Cause of Michigan’s worst water pollution is too much waste spread on too little land. To a large extent the harmful algal blooms that foul Michigan’s waters and turn western Lake Erie into a toxic inland sea are the result of mismatches. . Photographs by J.
Legal Planet
JUNE 27, 2024
It is significant because if its huge public health benefits and because it has provided the basis for EPA regulation of greenhouse gases. Clean Water Act. This law has done a good job at cleaning up municipal and industrial water pollution. Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Union of Concerned Scientists
JULY 1, 2024
This decision , reached with a 6-3 majority led by Chief Justice John Roberts, marks a significant shift in administrative law and has profound implications for environmental regulations and climate accountability. However, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority saw this as an opportunity to dismantle the doctrine altogether.
Law Columbia
APRIL 10, 2025
Moreover, Alaskas coastal waters are more vulnerable to acidification than those in lower latitudes, making aquaculture particularly beneficial in this region. Seaweed cultivation and sinking are regulated by a number of different laws at the state and federal levels. EPA may regulate seaweed sinking under the MPRSA.
PA Environment Daily
JANUARY 17, 2025
. -- DEP published notice in the January 18 PA Bulletin inviting comments on new and revised DEP Water Quality Assessment Methodology for listing and delisting impaired waters under the federal Clean Water Act 2026 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report. Monroe County. ( Montour County. (
Union of Concerned Scientists
JULY 9, 2024
When facilities emit less pollution, their regulations require less specific record-keeping and monitoring. How stringently facilities are monitored should be based on science and on the impacts on the people who live nearby—not by a judge’s ideological viewpoint on regulation.
Union of Concerned Scientists
OCTOBER 17, 2024
It is mind- bog -gling, syllable pun intended, that scientists still do not know how many wetlands lost protection in last year’s crippling of the Clean Water Act by the Supreme Court. Not the regulators, not the permit applicants, not the scientists…. Such a test leaves protection to the mercy of the states.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
354 
Let's personalize your content