This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Court Dismissed Counterclaims in ClimateScientist’s Defamation Lawsuit. Superior Court dismissed counterclaims brought by an individual writer against the climatescientist Michael Mann in Mann’s defamation lawsuit against National Review, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and two individuals. Chao , No. filed Sept.
The plaintiffs’ complaint asserting National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), CleanWaterAct, and Rivers and Harbors Act violations included allegations that the U.S. Arizona Court Ordered Production of ClimateScientists’ Emails Under Arizona’s Public Records Law. The planned pipeline is to be 162.5
The court said that having remanded to the Corps for consultation under the Endangered Species Act, it was not necessary to determine whether the Corps “made a fully informed and well-considered decision” under NEPA and the CleanWaterAct. s decision not to participate in the ParisAgreement.
Court Said ClimateScientist Provided Sufficient Evidence of Actual Malice for Blog Authors but Not for Publisher. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants violated NEPA, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the CleanWaterAct, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Energy Policy Advocates v.
Supreme Court reinstates Trump administration CleanWaterAct regulation. Maryland General Assembly passes major climate legislation. Diplomats fail to reach agreement in international biodiversity talks. Scientists sound alarm at US regulator’s new ‘forever chemicals’ definition – The Guardian.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content