This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
That’s because countries previously agreed under the ParisAgreement that, by the end of 2024, they would decide on the new quantum of climate finance for lower-income countries, building on the previous target of $100 billion/year. Here’s what’s on the agenda at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, and why it matters.
Earlier this year, The Guardian ran a powerful article exposing the ties of Elsevier, one of the world’s largest academic publishing companies, to the fossilfuel industry. The article caught my attention because I’d never considered the ways in which an academic publisher might be perpetuating and enabling a fossilfuel economy.
Union of Concerned Scientists’ (UCS) research shows that top fossilfuel producers’ emissions are responsible for as much as half of global surface temperature increase. The best solution: Replace fossilfuels with renewable energy. Pitting climate and energy against each other is an insidious lie.
This year’s annual global climate negotiations, COP29, concluded with an inadequate commitment on climate finance which countered the ParisAgreement’s foundational principles of global climate justice. trillion must be mobilized every year to transition away from fossilfuels, scale up cleanenergy, and adapt to climate damages.
Some events last week sent a strong signal that the tide is turning against fossilfuels. To paraphrase Churchill, this may not be beginning of the end for fossilfuels, but at least it is the end of the beginning of the campaign against them. Each of the events standing alone would have been noteworthy.
However, as we replace fossilfuels with clean electricity for heating and transportation to meet our climate goals, these peak demands will increasingly shift to the winter in many parts of the country. It’s worth delving into because it has some important implications for our cleanenergy future.
There is still much we can do to bend that emissions curve sharply within this decade—but only if world leaders, especially leaders of richer countries and major emitting nations, take responsibility to act together quickly and fossilfuel companies are held accountable for their decades of obstruction and deception.
According to the forecast, while economy-wide CO 2 emissions decrease from 2022 to 2037 due primarily to the growth in renewable energy replacing retiring coal plants, emissions do increase after 2037 from increased usage of natural gas. Transformative change to our energy system is needed if we are to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.
For the first time ever in the 27-year history of UN climate talks, at COP26 fossilfuels were mentioned in the final agreement. This shows that we are getting nearer to consigning the fossilfuel industry to history, even though there’s still a long way to go. Of those fossilfuels, coal will be the first to go.
The heavyweight global companies, such as Nestle, Unilever, the Mahindra Group and Volvo Cars, are just some of the leading signatures of a letter sent ahead of COP28 to world leaders, which calls on agreeing a timeline to phase out fossilfuels. COP28 begins on the 30th of November.
Resilience offers a forward-looking approach to corporate climate action and energy transition strategy. By Bernice Lee Following the ParisAgreement, corporate enthusiasm for climate action surged, with net-zero commitments and the energy transition taking a central role in both government and business agendas.
Canada promised to cut its greenhouse gas emissions after the 2016 ParisAgreement. It was part of the global agreement where 195 countries all agreed to reduce their emissions, and Canada has set this promise into law. Rather, they need to have proper plans on how they will build cleanenergy across the country.
C) of the ParisAgreement has significant implications for how the global financial system works and will be a centrepiece of the coming years. The first priority following the 2015 ParisAgreement was to clean up public financing, so Article 2.1(C) C) of the ParisAgreement. Article 2.1(C)
The world is moving away from fossilfuels. With renewable energy, like solar and wind, becoming cheaper and easier to scale up, there has never been a better moment for governments to transition away from the fossilfuel industry and its destructive impacts on the environment, the climate and communities.
In just over a month, the most important climate talks since the ParisAgreement was signed will decide the fate of global climate action. Five years down the line, countries were scheduled to return to the forum and finalise a rulebook on how to implement the ParisAgreement. By Lou Del Bello. On the agenda at COP26.
According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, fossilfuel production accounts for 35% of global greenhouse gas emissions. For the first time, Ocean Conservancy attended the annual International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) Assembly to help advance a just clean-energy transition.
By Anders Lorenzen The renewable energy sector experienced record growth in 2022 of 1%. But despite this, it did not shift the dominance of fossilfuels. They still account for 82% of the global energy supply according to the industry’s Statistical Review of World Energy released this week.
Contrary to climate science and the ParisAgreement, all eight assessed companies plan to increase fossilfuel production. It finds they are all on track to increase their oil and gas production in Canada, rather than planning a fair transition away from fossilfuels that are fuelling the climate crisis.
We need to rapidly transition financial support away from fossilfuels and towards the cleanenergy transition” said Alan Andrews, Ecojustice climate program director. Canada’s needs checks and balances to ensure that all investments contribute to a green future, this is critical to the security of Canada’s economy.
Canadian banks and pension funds rank in the bottom third globally on financing cleanenergy, yet are among the world’s largest investors in fossilfuels. Canada finally has an all-star team ready to tackle the biggest gap in Canada’s climate plans: regulations that align Canada’s financial system with climate action.
This leads to an important distinction between fossilfuels specifically produced or merely traded by Shell, as discussed in more detail below. Therefore, there is no room for new investment in fossilfuel supply and a need to decommission existing assets. To achieve this goal, rapid phase-out of fossilfuels is required.
The relevant CFPP owner has a ParisAgreement-aligned transition plan. These credits are generated by reducing emissions when a CFPP is retired early and replaced with cleanenergy. beyond those that have already been signed by December 2023). These credits must meet global standards such as the Core Carbon Principles.
Alberta: Speak Up For a SAFE Climate: Take Action Here How Climate Action Makes Life More Affordable Renewable energy, including solar and wind power, is much cheaper and less polluting than burning fossilfuels such as natural gas, oil and coal. A stitch in time saves $32 trillion.
However, Canada is failing to address a key root of the climate crisis — the continued flow of capital by Canadian financial institutions into fossilfuel development and extraction. Canada’s financial institutions are among the largest funders of fossilfuels in the world, and continue to underinvest in cleanenergy.
Although criticized for half measures and loopholes, blamed in part on the influence of petrostates, the agreement reached at the conference should be welcomed as a significant step in the move away from fossilfuels. But it notes Parties are off track when it comes to meeting their ParisAgreement goals.
C carbon budget set forth in the 2015 ParisAgreement, countries must reduce CO2 emissions in the entire [existing] built environment by 50-65% by 2030 and reach zero carbon by 2040. Carbon Emissions Emissions goals were set in response to urgent developments in climate science indicating that for the world to meet the 1.5°C
Scientists have consistently warned that the continued burning of fossilfuels is heating the planet, including the ocean. Now is a critical time for our ocean, which has long protected us from the worst impacts of climate change by absorbing much of the excess heat produced by the continued burning of fossilfuels.
Cuba’s power system is currently heavily reliant on fossilfuels. In 2022, fossilfuels accounted for about 95% of electricity generation, and about 48% of the fossilfuels used were imported, putting the country at high risk of price shocks and supply shortages.
Ecojustice, Greenpeace Canada, Stand.earth, Environmental Defence Canada, Keepers of the Water, Leadnow, For Our Kids, and Change Course call on the five major Canadian banks to take responsibility for the impact of their investments in fossilfuels, which are exacerbating the climate crisis.
Bill C-50 is a necessary tool to set Canadian workers up for success in a low-carbon economy Countries around the world are choosing to ditch fossilfuels, like oil, gas and coal, to use renewable energy and increase the energy efficiency of homes, cars and factories. This shift is a major opportunity for Canada.
As per the World Investment Report 2023, much of the growth in international investment in renewable energy, which has nearly tripled since the adoption of the ParisAgreement in 2015, was concentrated in developed countries. Developing countries need renewable energy investments of about US$1.7
Reduce Ontario’s GHG emissions by at least 50 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, targets consistent with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the most ambitious aspects of the ParisAgreement. Levelling the playing field by redirecting subsidies away from fossilfuels. .
As one of the world’s top funders of fossilfuels, taking over HSBC’s Canadian operations, at a time when its parent company was already taking concrete action to lower its financed emissions, is a significant step backwards on climate.
There was no progress on getting national governments to state stronger ambitions in their NDCs, in the additional specification of global targets, or even in non-binding language regarding intentions to cut fossilfuels. C ambition from Paris. There was even, briefly, alarm that the COP might fail to re-affirm the 1.5°C
At COP28 , on 9 December, India’s environment and climate change minister Bhupender Yadav affirmed the country’s “trust and confidence” in the ParisAgreement , whilst highlighting the country’s achievements in emissions reduction. Fossilfuels remain necessary”, Jairaj says.
The demand statement focuses on upholding Indigenous rights and respecting Indigenous knowledge, bold and ambitious climate action (including phasing out fossilfuels and guaranteeing a just transition to a sustainable cleanenergy economy), protecting and restoring nature and establishing environmental rights in Canada.
Spring is a time of new beginnings, and this spring scientists are calling for financial institutions to start doing their part to limit the worst impacts of climate change and hasten a just, equitable transition to cleanenergy. trillion in the seven years since the adoption of the Paris climate agreement.
Last week, I joined my colleagues at COP28 in Dubai , as negotiators and civil society push for a fossilfuel phaseout to meet climate goals. The industry is pushing a narrative that misleadingly calls out emissions , not fossilfuels as the problem. Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report.
The resolution also calls on countries to “move towards a clean and just energy transition.” Several countries in the OAS have committed to increased use of cleanenergy in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to the ParisAgreement. This transition has already led to climate litigation.
According to the petitioner, as a signatory to the ParisAgreement Brazil has committed to various duties to mitigate climate change. While these targets were established voluntarily, they became mandatory once the ParisAgreement was promulgated as national law in Brazil through an executive decree.
C mark, because of decades of inaction on the part of policymakers and decades of deception and obstruction on the part of fossilfuel companies. To secure the livable future that children around the world deserve, we must double down, ratchet up pressure on governments, and break the power of the fossilfuel industry.
It’s not just the poor air quality, long lines, and excessive fossilfuel company representation ; nations are still too far apart in their positions on a fossilfuel phaseout, the top priority for this COP. Yet global fossilfuel production and use continue to expand. Particulate matter (PM2.5)
The geopolitics of energy are also quite different today than they were in the 1970s. But there is one clear parallel that is worth emphasizing: the current crisis, like the crisis of the 1970s, is a crisis of the fossilfuelenergy system. Fossilfuel supporters have been quick to say “I told you so.”
The legislation committed nearly $400 billion to support, among other things, wind and solar power, battery storage, electric vehicles, and other cleanenergy technologies that will make a significant dent in US heat-trapping emissions. It also will save US consumers money because they will spend less on fossilfuels.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content