This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
EPA is reconsidering these regulations to ensure they do not prevent America from unleashing energy dominance and continuing our trajectory as a leader in cleanenergy and emissions reductions. Technologies to treat produced water to a quality for safe discharge and reuse have become more effective and affordable.
Senate Bill 334 / House Bill 76 establish that a person who meets the threshold standing requirements under the federal CleanWaterAct has an unconditional right and the authority to intervene in a civil action initiated by the State in State court to require compliance with certain waterpollutioncontrol measures.
In August 2017, NYSDEC conditionally denied the developer’s joint application for state law stream disturbance and freshwater wetlands permits, as well as for a water quality certificate pursuant to Section 401 of the CleanWaterAct, asserting that a recent D.C. Army Corps of Engineers had violated the CleanWaterAct.
Under the Endangered Species Act, the court vacated the FWS’s biological opinion because the incidental take statement lacked “the requisite specificity of mitigation measures for the polar bear” and because the take finding for the polar bear was arbitrary and capricious. According to news reports, ACCR raised two major claims.
House leadership unveils legislation reauthorizing the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy Office of Science. Supreme Court to hear CleanWaterAct case. CleanWaterAct: In what will be one of the most important final environmental rulings in the history of the U.S.,
The Washington Court of Appeals held that the PollutionControl Hearing Board erred when it approved the Washington Department of Ecology’s general permits for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Circuit Decision on Affordable CleanEnergy Rule. June 25, 2021). Washington State Dairy Federation v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
95 
Let's personalize your content