This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The issue was whether state plans under the CleanAirAct only need to prevent violation of national air quality standards, or whether they must prevent deterioration in areas where the air is already cleaner than the standards. International Harvester Co. Ruckelshaus (1973). In immediate terms, this D.C.
First off, the definition of pollutant in the CleanAirAct (CAA) clearly does include CO 2 as well as water vapor. But both claims are bogus. This was the point litigated in Massachusetts v. However, it is not absurd that one might consider this, but in practice it is not a very sensible idea.
Aviation is a significant and growing source of greenhouse gas emissions. But the federal government in the United States has failed to address it so far.
On July 28, the US Environmental Protection Agency formally issued an interim final rule extending several deadlines for industry compliance with national methane standards for new and existing oil and gas facilities, known as Section 111, OOOOb/c of the CleanAirAct. 9 Webinar On Growth Of A.I.
Of Conservation Districts’ Trash Cleanup Challenge Brentwood-Baldwin-Whitehall Multi-Municipal Shade Tree Commission Member Donna McCrea Recognized With Keep PA Beautiful Community Pride Award In Allegheny County Coterra Energy Fined $299,000 For Contaminating 13 Private Water Supplies In Lenox Twp.,
Local Law 97 is one of the countrys most ambitious municipal climate policies, requiring the Citys largest buildings to comply with increasingly stringent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions limits. The first, CLCPA 10, preserves the existing authority of state entities to adopt and implement greenhouse gas emissions reduction measures.
It similarly prohibits the states energy code and state regulatory bodies from prohibit[ing], penaliz[ing] or discourag[ing] building gas use, and it repeals zero greenhouse gas building objectives. But I-2066 does more than just preempt local governments on gas use in buildings.
XTO) [ExxonMobil] and Hilcorp Energy Company (Hilcorp) , agreed to resolve alleged CleanAirAct and Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act violations involving their oil and gas production operations in Pennsylvania. In separate agreements, XTO Energy Inc. DEP Announce $5.275 Million In Penalties, Plus $1.4
What’s Bugging You If It Isn’t A Mosquito Background On Issues -- Coterra Energy Fined $299,000 For Contaminating 13 Private Water Supplies In Lenox Twp.,
The case involves EPAs 2024 Vehicle Standards that set new air pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards for model year 2027 through 2032 Light- and Medium-Duty Vehicles, which have been challenged by states and industry groups. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Kentucky v.
The report provides renewed evidence of the consequences for our health of using fossil fuels In 1970 the CleanAirAct and the newly formed Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) were given authority by Congress to regulate pollution from passenger cars and other forms of transportation. From 2000 to 2020, national PM 2.5
But it has passed laws regulating two powerful greenhouse gases, and some other climate laws stretching back over the past five decades. I’m not including laws that simply incentivize clean energy or those that fund pure science, even though both are vitally important parts of climate policy.
This would ensure that manufacturers are only compliant with the least protective regulation in any given year, including a provision that would actually allow manufacturers to simply buy their way out of compliance with the CleanAirAct, something that is explicitly disallowed under current law.
EPA Supreme Court ruling which held that greenhouse gas emissions are unambiguously air pollutants covered by the CleanAirAct. Attacks on the Endangerment Finding and EPAs CleanAirAct authority from industry interests are nothing new. Court of AppealsD.C.
Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) 2024 greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles (the HDV Rule) that went into effect on June 21, 2024. Yesterday, January 21, 2025, the Sabin Center filed an amicus brief on behalf of the National League of Cities (NLC) and the U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) in support of the U.S.
Related Articles This Week: -- Coterra Energy Fined $299,000 For Contaminating 13 Private Water Supplies In Lenox Twp., So Far This Year [PaEN] -- PJM Interconnection Again Extends Maximum Generation Alert & Load Management Alert To July 30; Demand Response Programs Implemented On July 28, 29 [PaEN] -- Penn State Extension: Sept.
The EPA has found the current (or any increasing) mix of atmospheric concentrations of six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, poses a threat to human health. Supreme Court, not the wind or solar industries, that forced the EPA to act on the basis of existing law, the CleanAirAct.
Bush refuses to regulate greenhouse gases, reneging on a campaign pledge to do so. If firms expected these government decisions to have enormous economic effects, youd expect them to prepare by doing more hiring when a government decisions anticipated effect is a significant economic upturn, and less it is a significant downturn. After: 6.1%.
It calls out Californias long-standing greenhouse gas cap-and-trade program, as well as New Yorks and Vermonts recent laws reinforcing the right to hold major emitters responsible for climate impacts they have contributed to, as illegitimate impediments to American energy. As noted, these restrictions are narrow, clear, and widely understood.
On March 12, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin announced plans to reconsider EPAs 2009 endangerment finding for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, along with all regulations and actions that rely on the finding. It also rests on Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. 7521(a)(1).
Technology Center, Room 243, 200 Innovation Blvd, State College. So Far This Year [PaEN] -- Spotlight PA: Why Pennsylvanians May See Higher Electric Bills This Summer And Next [PJM Auction, A.I.
Elective pay itself is untouched in the OBBB Act, but the aggressive phase-out of and additional restrictions imposed upon the underlying tax credits severely impact eligible entities’ ability to claim them via elective pay. Rescission and repeal of certain federal funding programs The OBBB Act has implications far beyond the tax code.
In late 2009, EPA made a formal finding often called the Endangerment Finding that greenhouse gases may endanger human health and welfare. Understanding the Endangerment Finding Two requirements must be met before a substance can be regulated under the CleanAirAct. First, it has to qualify as an air pollutant.
Notably, in granting the Advanced Clean Car waiver , EPA relied heavily on the fact that the program cuts traditional air pollutants, including those that cause ozone pollution, from vehicles. The fact that the standards also cut greenhouse gases is a secondary consideration.
California is allowed to set standards stronger than the federal government under the 1970 CleanAirAct provisions in recognition that CA, and many other states which have adopted CA standards , serve an important role as laboratories of innovation controlling air pollution in novel ways. In the U.S.,
Miles Of 4 Texas Eastern Natural Gas Pipelines To Allow For Longwall Coal Mining In Greene County [PaEN] -- DEP Posted 78 Pages Of Permit-Related Notices In July 26 PA Bulletin [PaEN] Related Articles Last Week: -- Attorney General Sunday Files Criminal Charges Against Equitrans For 2022 Leak Of 1.1 9 Webinar On Growth Of A.I.
And buried within the list of 31 is a huge bombshell: the “reconsideration” of EPA’s finding that greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare under the CleanAirAct.
Trump has made no secret either of his antipathy toward zero emission vehicles or of his intent to revoke the special authority California has under the CleanAirAct to issue its own vehicle pollution standards. And of course the global community is adopting EVs at an even faster pace than the U.S.
The EPA requires new trucks to emit fewer greenhouse gases and health-harming pollutants than existing models. UCS and local advocates are looking to win a similar rule in New York, the Clean Deliveries Act. These rules are sometimes called indirect source rules, and are legally defined as such in the federal CleanAirAct.
For example, Section 60103 of the IRA , which establishes the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) , specifies that $15 billion of the $27 billion allocated to the GGRF should be used for the purposes of providing financial assistance and technical assistance in low-income and disadvantaged communities.
Senate may vote this week to revoke California’s authority under the CleanAirAct to cut pollution from cars and trucks. The Senate vote is on a resolution to use the Congressional Review Act to overturn three separate waivers EPA granted California to cut pollutants from cars and trucks.
MW-Day For 2025/26 Delivery Compared To $28.92/MW-Day MW-Day In 2024-25; Extreme Weather Risk Big Factor [PaEN] Related Articles This Week: -- Coterra Energy Fined $299,000 For Contaminating 13 Private Water Supplies In Lenox Twp., 9 Webinar On Growth Of A.I.
Environmental Protection Agency, agreeing to decide whether fossil fuel manufacturers have legal standing to challenge an EPA decision under the federal CleanAirAct. Last Friday, the justices granted review in Diamond Alternative Energy v. On Monday, the Court denied review in a separate but related case, Ohio v.
establishing that heat-trapping emissions (or greenhouse gas emissions) are air pollutants covered by the CleanAirAct. The court further mandated that, under the CleanAirAct, the EPA must set protective standards for global warming pollutants if the agency found them to be harmful to human health and welfare.
To recap: The unanimous opinion found that nations of the world have a legal obligation to limit their emissions of greenhouse gases or else pay reparations for the harms of climate change. EPA is renouncing its ability to even regulate greenhouse gases as a threat to human health.
So Far This Year [PaEN] -- PJM Interconnection Again Extends Maximum Generation Alert & Load Management Alert To July 30; Demand Response Programs Implemented On July 28, 29 [PaEN] -- Penn State Extension: Sept. 9 Webinar On Growth Of A.I.
Completes Successful Lithium Extraction From Shale Gas Wastewater At Susquehanna County Pilot Plant [PaEN] PA Oil & Gas Industry Public Notice Dashboards: -- Pennsylvania Oil & Gas Weekly Compliance Dashboard- July 26 to August 1 [PaEN] -- Coterra Energy Fined $299,000 For Contaminating 13 Private Water Supplies In Lenox Twp.,
So Far This Year [PaEN] -- PJM Electricity Auction: PJM Lost 2.8 Gigawatts Of Power Due To Reduced Reliability Rating Of Natural Gas Power Plants; Could Gain 12.2 Gigawatts By Increasing Reliability From Less Than 75% Now To An Achievable 90% [PaEN] -- Guest Essay: Three Proposals To Protect Consumers From A.I.
Before making this finding, first had to offer a novel reading of the CleanAirAct (CAA). These efforts were based on section 111 of the CleanAirAct. To put it another way, the new approach isn’t just a shift in how the agency thinks about greenhouse gases. This is a bizarre conclusion: U.S.
The EPA, following administrator Lee Zeldin’s anti-science and anti-public health agenda, also just sent its proposal to reconsider EPA’s greenhouse gas endangerment finding to the White House Office of Management and Budget.
On June 17, 2025, EPA published a proposed rule to either repeal entirely, or significantly revise, a rule issued in 2024 which set performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants to limit their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This week, the Sabin Center filed three comment letters opposing the proposal.
Several states and industry groups are challenging EPA’s 2024 rules which set greenhouse gas emissions limits for certain fossil fuel power plants nationwide (referred to here as the Power Plant Rules). This case will have a major impact on how and when power plants must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund The IRAs Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) program is the largest of EPAs program terminations by dollars. The Endangerment Finding was EPAs 2009 determination that greenhouse gases endanger public health and endanger public welfare.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content