This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The CleanWaterAct (CWA), one of the nation’s most important environmental laws, is 50 years old today. The nation’s rivers, streams, lakes and ocean waters are dramatically cleaner and healthier than they were a half-century ago. (credit: Amazon). ” That obviously did not, and will not, happen.
Why might we have an environmental review statute such as NEPA when we already have a range of other environmental protection statutes such as the CleanAirAct, the CleanWaterAct, and more? The first post is here. What does NEPA do that these other statutes are not already doing?
CleanAirAct. In public health terms, what makes air pollution distinctive is the millions of people exposes to common pollutants such as particulates and smog. CleanWaterAct. This law has done a good job at cleaning up municipal and industrial water pollution.
As an example of a statutory delegation of authority, the Court cites a provision in the CleanWaterAct, 33 U. would interfere with the attainment or maintenance of that water quality. which shall assure” various outcomes, such as the “protection of public health” and “public water supplies.”
For example, regulations under the CleanAirAct and the CleanWaterAct, which often rely on broad and ambiguous statutory mandates, are now vulnerable to unfavorable rulings at the hand of activist judges. This could hinder efforts to implement climate policies at the federal level.
In the previous three years, Congress had passed NEPA, the CleanAirAct, and the CleanWaterAct. Continuing the legislative wave, 1973 saw the passage of the Endangered Species Act (ESA. 1973 was at the crest of the environmental surge that swept the United States half a century ago.
Legal Planet's Richard Frank posted today on the US CleanWaterAct's 50th birthday. Nevertheless, and with the possible exception of the CleanAirAct, no law enacted as part of the outpouring of federal environmental legislation in the 1970’s has proven more successful and transformational than the CWA.
The CleanWaterAct – It’s routine for EPA to take more than 10 years to act on NPDES permit renewals. The CleanAirAct – The Supreme Court has ruled that it does not provide authority for EPA to address the defining issue of our time. They created a pathway towards cleaning our air, water, and land.
However, since major US environmental laws are enacted to protect the air, water, and land separately (i.e. the CleanAirAct, the CleanWaterAct, the Safe Drinking WaterAct), as a result, EPA programs are often implemented narrowly, not holistically.
He also goes on to state that "The 1960s were also Congress’s first forays into issues like air and water pollution, wilderness protection, and the endangered species. " Even allowing for methodological nationalism and the focus on the unrepresentative Supreme Court, this is all rather strange.
The 1960s were also Congress’s first forays into issues like air and water pollution, wilderness protection, and the endangered species. Download as PDF. The post Learning to Name Environmental Problems appeared first on Legal Planet.
This includes conducting a comprehensive review of stormwater discharges and groundwater contamination and implementing initiatives to ensure compliance with environmental laws, including the CleanWaterAct, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and parallel Pennsylvania laws.
The central takeaway of this book is that though Democrats controlled Congress throughout these years, “all environmental laws passed from 1964 to 1976 commanded huge bipartisan support” (p.
Use of federal common law to pursue water pollution cases enjoyed a big revival in the 1960s and early 1970s. It was ended by the Supreme Court, which held that the then-new CleanWaterAct took over the field of interstate water pollution in lieu of court-made rules. Climate change.
She contends the federal Natural Gas Act mandates the federal Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has “exclusive jurisdiction over an appeal which challenges any state agency’s action in either approving or denying a permit when the state agency acts on the basis of federal law.”
She contends the federal Natural Gas Act mandates the federal Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has “exclusive jurisdiction over an appeal which challenges any state agency’s action in either approving or denying a permit when the state agency acts on the basis of federal law.”
Earth Day was created in 1970 by Senator Gaylor Nelson to draw attention to ongoing issues with toxic air and waste. Twenty million Americans participated in the first Earth Day, eventually leading to the formation of the EPA and then the passing of the CleanAirAct and CleanWaterAct.
Bedrock federal environmental, health, and safety laws have gaping loopholes and exemptions that allow radioactive oil and gas materials to go virtually unregulated, including the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act that governs waste management, the Atomic Energy Act, the CleanWaterAct, the Safe Drinking WaterAct, and the CleanAirAct.
The Court’s embrace of the ill-defined “ major questions doctrine ” as the rationale for refusing to give any deference to EPA’s admittedly “plausible” interpretation of section 111 d of the CleanAirAct has raised the specter of the Court’s conservative majority taking a sharp axe to any number of environmental regulations.
The CleanWaterAct – It’s routine for EPA to take more than 10 years to act on NPDES permit renewals. The CleanAirAct – The Supreme Court has ruled that it does not provide authority for EPA to address the defining issue of our time. They created a pathway towards cleaning our air, water, and land.
Instead, EPA will allow state agencies to meet inspection requirements through alternative means including: postponing inspections until they are determined to be safe when possible, using off-site compliance monitoring, and off-site inspections.
Additional services that may be provided by the team include regulatory support for CleanWaterAct, Resources Conservation and Recovery Act, Comprehensive Environmental Restoration Compensation and Liability Act, CleanAirAct, National Environmental Policy Act, Oil Pollution Act, and other federal, state, and local environmental programs.
Take for instance: the burning Cuyahoga River that led to the CleanWaterAct; the disastrous air pollution incident in Donora, PA that led to the passage of the CleanAirAct; the discovery of Love Canal that lead to the passage of Superfund; and most tragically, the chemical gas release in Bhopal, India that lead to the passage of EPCRA.
Strengthen environmental regulations like the CleanWaterAct, CleanAirAct and Toxic Substances Control Act protections to reduce pollution and climate impacts in fenceline communities.
Toxic Substances Control Act section 7 imminently hazardous chemical. Supreme Court regarding the CleanAirAct and other environmental statutes as to whether EPA is required to consider costs when promulgating a rule. There have been multiple cases that have gone up to the U.S.
Permit conditions – Several statutes require permit holders to have and implement plans to prepare for extreme events – e.g., CleanAirAct; CleanWaterAct; Oil Pollution Act; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
The past few month has seen a series of important environmental law decisions from various courts across the United States. The post From Supreme Court to State Courts, Important Enviro Rulings from June 2021 appeared first on National Agricultural Law Center.
EPA also will revise the evaluations to include fenceline community risk assessment scenarios – which might respond to challengers concerned with subpopulation exposures.
National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) : A set of EPA standards on air pollutant emissions of chemicals that could cause serious permanent harm to wildlife or people or kill organic matter. It prohibits the discharge of polluting chemicals into US waters unless a special permit is granted.
If passed, however, the EJ for All Act could catalyze a transformational shift in how pollution is regulated, how environmental regulations are enforced, and how affected communities are able to participate in regulatory decisionmaking.
Methane Emissions EPA announced it would reconsider regulations for the oil and gas industry under Section 111 of the CleanAirAct and Subpart W of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. EPA also announced it would reconsider risk management rules that cover oil and natural gas refineries and chemical facilities.
For example, EPA under the CleanWaterAct established 129 “ Priority Pollutants ” in 1976, a list of which is a typical analytical suite that you can order as a package. CleanWaterAct. Through this law, water pollution is managed by controlling wastewater discharges.
The bill further requires EPA to list PFOA and PFOS as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) under the CleanAirAct and establish pretreatment standards and effluent limits for the compounds under the CleanWaterAct. The bill now heads to the U.S.
EPA’s Strategic Roadmap is a critical step forward in addressing PFAS pollution. Every level of government – from local, to state, to Tribal, to federal will need to exercise increased and sustained leadership to continue the momentum and make progress on PFAS.
On May 16, the Fifth Circuit heard oral arguments – again – on one of the largest citizen suit penalties ever awarded under the federal CleanAirAct. bars against citizen suits for entirely past violations of the CleanWaterAct under the Gwaltney doctrine). In Environment Texas Citizen Lobby v.
Greenberg Traurig Tampa office Shareholders David Weinstein and Christopher Torres and Associate Kayli Smendec co-authored the chapter titled “Environmental Enforcement and Crimes” in Environment, Energy, and Resources Law: The Year in Review 2021, published by the ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources.
Bartolotta contends the federal Natural Gas Act mandates the federal Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction over an appeal which challenges any state agencys action in either approving or denying a permit when the state agency acts on the basis of federal law.
EPA – Proposed Consent Decree, CleanAirAct Citizen Suit. EPA – Proposed Settlement Agreement, CleanWaterAct. Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received by Dec. EPA – Draft Human Health and/or Ecological Risk Assessments for Several Pesticides; Notice of Availability. 3, 2022.
The real question this Court wants to address, however, is whether the regulation of groundwater by the Agency can ever be within the power granted to it by the CleanWaterAct. [ix]. The CleanAirAct and the CleanWaterAct are pretty analogous. EPA , 142 S.Ct. 2587, 2612 (2022). [xi]
Louisiana, will spend more than $10 million on pollution controls to address air, water, and hazardous waste violations at two petrochemical plants in Point Comfort, Texas, and Baton Rouge, La. USA: Formosa Plastics Corp., Texas, and Formosa Plastics Corp.,
Read More » Tags: Air , CleanAirAct , CleanWaterAct , Due Process , Federal Jurisdiction , Federal Procedure , Greenhouse Gas , Kentucky , Louisiana , Procedure , Rapanos , Standing , Water Five days later, in The State of Louisiana, et al. Biden, Jr., Wiener, Jr. Wiener, Jr.
The statutes that form the foundation of the program, like the 1972 CleanWaterAct, dont seek to close polluting plants. The 1970 CleanAirAct led to restrictions on lead, particulates, and nitrogen from tailpipes that cleared the air of smog and led to much better vehicles.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content