This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
On Monday, I explained why this is an especially urgent time for new law students to be thinking about the climate crisis and how they can contribute as lawyers. This is going to be a growth area for law firms and correspondingly an attractive career path for new lawyers. Land Use Law.
In preparing to teach a course on climate law, I was really struck by how broad and rich the field has become. Back in the day, it was nearly all international law, but nowadays there’s a huge amount of U.S. domestic law. and international law. and international law. Standards for emissions from new vehicles.
The Section 45V Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit (“45V”), passed as part of 2022’s landmark climate investment law , was specifically designed to spur the shift away from today’s dirty methods of hydrogen production to truly clean production processes instead.
In response, some state policy makers and advocates are now considering legal avenues to effectively require the use of sustainable aviation fuels, which emit less carbon than traditional jet fuel when burned and in some cases can eliminate these emissions altogether.
The majority 6–3 decision sharply curtails the EPA’s authority to set standards based on a broad range of flexible options to cut carbonemissions from the power sector—options such as replacing polluting fossil fuels with cheap and widely available wind and solar power coupled with battery storage. carbonemissions today.
In this vein, 2024 included advances like Massachusettss new clean energy law , which will streamline equitable siting for clean energy projects. 2024 also saw many fruits of federal policy, notably the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act , including tax credits for households, businesses, and renewable energy project owners.
In December 2018, after having successfully reduced greenhouse gas emissions from the power sector by 53.3%, a majority of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) jurisdictions announced plans to design a program to address carbonemissions from the combustion of transportation fuels.
State clean energy laws have been bedeviled by challenges based on this doctrine. As an example, consider laws that encourage a state’s utilities to buy power from renewables. Those laws encourage the construction of new solar and wind in nearby states, while causing coal plants to lose market share and potentially close.
On a per capita basis, Australia’s carbonemissions are even higher than the United States. In 2022, the Labor coalition passed a law mandating that Australia cut greenhouse gas emissions 43% below 2005 levels by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2050. This March, Australia adopted a follow-up law to implement these targets.
Texas and a number of other states have passed laws banning what they call “boycotts of fossil fuel companies.” Besides being fundamentally misguided and difficult to implement, these blacklist laws are incompetently drafted and quite likely unconstitutional. B) does business with a company described by Paragraph (A).”.
The Federal Cabinet adopts its first climate target, a 25-30% cut in carbonemissions by 2005 under 1987 levels. Note: the estimates of 1990 emissions that I found are not entirely consistent, with one estimate closer to 1.2 Climate law makes emission targets legally binding 2019. trillion tons.]
One option, a tax on carbon dioxide emissions, gets the most attention but seems politically impossible. The closest we’ve ever come to a carbon tax is a limited fee on methane emissions under the new IRA law. If a carbon tax were politically feasible, there would be a lot to be said in its favor.
The possibility of snagging some of this funding may also help nudge some lagging states to think seriously about cutting carbonemissions. Under the Clean Air Act, California has the unique ability to set its own standards for tailpipe emissions from new vehicles, including greenhouse gases. Download as PDF.
Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act, providing $369 billion in tax credit and spending to reduce carbonemissions. The biggest of these stories is the Inflation Reduction Act, the first major climate law ever to pass Congress. It will reduce cumulative GHG emissions by an estimated 6.3
Here’s an embarrassing confession: Though I had taught environmental law for 25 years at that point, I had never heard of section 111(d) until it was discussed as possible tool to limit carbonemissions. The Court called that provision obscure. I can’t contest that view.
Did the companies initiate plans to cut emissions or were they forced to do so by state law? thanks to Jetta Cook, Berkeley Law ’22). (1) Carbon Reduction Goals : Reduction of carbonemissions from generating facilities by 80% from 2000 levels by 2050. Other Carbon Free: 4%. Sources and Complete Data.
Some boards already have former EPA officials or even, in at least one case, an environmental law professor. To make that work, however, we would need to supplement the current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to include rules for accounting for carbonemissions and other environmental impacts.
It based its ruling on a French law, which said that “any person responsible for ecological damage is obliged to remedy it.” It ordered Shell Oil, which is based in the Netherlands, to move rapidly to decarbonize its own operations and avoid selling products that would lead to carbonemissions — natural gas and gasoline, more specifically.
In 2019, it signed an agreement with a Chinese steelmaker to find ways to reduce emissions from steel making. Still, it remains responsible for 31 Gigatons of carbonemissions per year. That would allow the company to disclaim any responsibility for the carbonemissions, while doing nothing to address the problem.
Mexico’s carbonemissions are about the same as those of Texas, the highest-emitting US state. Per capita emissions, however, are far lower, given Mexico’s much larger population. The result could be a sharp increase in Mexico’s energy-related carbonemissions, undermining Mexico’s ability to achieve its Paris targets.
Today marks one year since the precedent-setting court ruling in the Netherlands, which ordered Shell to cut its activities’ carbonemissions by 45 percent compared to 2019 levels to align with the Paris climate agreement. The commission’s trailblazing work is only the beginning.
A month from now, the Supreme Court will hear a case about an animal cruelty law. It’s not an environmental law case, but the ruling could impact the authority of states to address climate change. The problem is drawing a line, since many laws by a state as big as California have economic impacts elsewhere.
Among many other provisions, CEJA includes carbonemission limits for coal and fossil gas plants that phase in over several years, starting in 2030. CEJA also expanded incentives for wind and solar power; however, the law did not include significant provisions for energy storage deployment.
In teaching my class on Climate Law, I’ve been struck by how many new legal questions courts are confronting as a result of the climate crisis. Consider this list of examples: Given that coal has larger carbonemissions than other sources of energy can EPA adopt a strategy of phasing out its use in the electric power sector?
Polling showed broad public support for more aggressive cuts in carbonemissions. Labor’s climate policy calls for a 43% reduction in carbonemissions by 2030. Climate change wasn’t a central issue in the campaign, but resistance to climate action no longer provided a political advantage.
The same is true in environmental law. Was it a fundamental paradigm shift, re-centering the law on new values? With all this in mind, here are the cases that I see as making up the canon and anti-canons of environmental law. This gave EPA the power to impose limits on carbonemissions by vehicles and industry.
Not to be outdone, 19 Republican state attorneys general also joined the fray in August, falsely claiming that “woke” asset managers are politicizing their investments by adopting ESG criteria instead of focusing solely on financial returns, as required by law, at the expense of their state pension funds. (No
That’s understandable in terms of India’s current carbonemissions, which are now only a quarter of China’s. But given the growth of the economy, carbonemissions were projected to continuing growing steadily through 2030. By some projections, it will have the second largest economy in the world by 2050.
Meanwhile, the launch ceremony for China’s emissions trading program will be held on Friday. The system will involve over 2000 firms, accounting for one-seventh of global carbonemissions. The delays were apparently due to gaps in emissions data along with political maneuvering.
DTE’s goal is to reach “net-zero” emissions by 2050 while reducing its carbonemissions from 2005 levels 65 percent by 2028, 85 percent by 2035, and 90 percent by 2040. DTE was already far along in preparing its long-term energy plan when the law passed. What’s in DTE’s proposed plan?
A multi-decade legal history, including four Supreme Court decisions, has led to unimpeachable clarity on this one point: EPA has a statutory obligation to regulate carbonemissions from power plants under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act. EPA ruling, EPA can still establish rigorous carbonemissions standards.
UCS along with more than 100,000 members of the public have written in support of this national rule that will gather the scattered and incomplete data counting greenhouse gas emissions into a unified standard so local, state, and federal transportation authorities can make informed decisions. They just need to put them together.
Remedies for Harmful Algal Blooms Are Available in Law and Practice — Circle of Blue. If carbonemissions continue to rise until the middle of the century, this figure climbs to $2.2 Eric Holcomb has signed a law regulating the underground storage of carbon dioxide, the Northwest Indiana Times reports. In the News.
Between one and three per cent of all energy used worldwide powers Artificial Intelligence, some of which is being used to power such essential services as revealing what your mother-in-law would look like if she were a cat. First, carbon capture has not yet proven to be even modestly effective in reducing carbonemissions.
Water is poised for prominence this year in state law and policy. Kathy Hochul of New York proposing to cut heat-trapping carbonemissions. Passing new laws is easier with this arrangement. Lawmakers in Phoenix and in other state capitals see water as a priority this year. They are not alone.
With economic growth have come carbonemissions. As of 2016, half of its total emissions are from the power sector, with 20% from industry and 15% from transportation, and. South Korea also agreed to join the Global Methane Pledge and cut emissions one third by 2030.
There’s always been concern that talking about climate adaptation might mislead people into thinking that cutting carbonemissions isn’t urgent. Even if we manage to curb carbonemissions by midcentury, the need for adaptation will only escalate. Download as PDF.
On this theory, China seems to have a clear duty to pay: it emits about 28% of world carbon, so it should be paying a hefty fee to other countries to compensate them for the harm its current emissions will cause them now and in the future. Compensation for Past Conduct. Global Income Redistribution.
The US Supreme Court’s recent decision dramatically limiting EPA’s ability to curb carbonemissions is bad news for our fight against climate change. With a legislative session that’s about to wrap up, getting the bill into law will require diplomacy and ambition. Where things stand.
[Note: Section 1724-H of the Fiscal Code bill prohibits DEP from using federal money from the Inflation Reduction Act for the Solar for All program unless it is authorized by state law after the effective date of the act. It does not include the RISE PA Program.
This needs some thought, as both the laws of physics and the principles of supply and demand will apply, even if legislatures and regulators have not yet spoken about allocating costs and resources related to data center energy demands. Dominion Energy can’t address the laws of physics, or even the laws of supply and demand, by themselves.
billion annually and reduce yearly carbonemissions by almost 3 million metric tons – the equivalent of removing over 600,000 vehicles from the roads. For example, participating in federal markets may reduce state autonomy over electricity sector policy or expose them to risks that federal law would preempt state laws.
With $14 billion in new federal funding, the infrastructure law was supposed to jolt efforts to protect the U.S. highway network from a changing climate and curb carbonemissions that are warming the planet.
” This actually pretty typical language in environmental statutes,, such as section 202 of the Clean Air Act, which EPA has used to limit carbonemissions from cars. The Court summarizes that section as saying: “Whenever, in the judgment of the [Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)] Administrator.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content