This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This being Cinco de Mayo, it seems like an appropriate time for a look at Mexico’s climate challenges. Mexico’s carbonemissions are about the same as those of Texas, the highest-emitting US state. Per capita emissions, however, are far lower, given Mexico’s much larger population.
Sometimes it is left out of statistics, or reported separately as LULUCF – Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry. Our response to climatechange is a balancing act: we work to reduce carbonemissions on the one hand and to enhance nature’s ability to absorb carbon on the other.
The last few days saw two major developments in international rights-based climate litigation, with the adoption of a new resolution by the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) and a long-awaited decision on a climate case by the Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Recent Developments on rights-based climate litigation.
The perfect storm that is brewing, as climatechange impacts and biological resource security converge, requires the same level—or higher—of alertness and swift action from decision-makers. Of course, there’s a big difference in which countries bear the responsibility for carbonemissions and the collapse of biocapacity.
It contributes to increasing pressure against President Bolsonaro for widespread environmental damage across the country, resulting from a significant lack of climate action and the pervasive destruction of the Amazon rainforest. Omissions from the Brazilian government on climate policy. o C global warming scenario.
But, the idea of a shared benefit—both to the world and Brazil—is a paradox developing and developed nations have struggled with concerning their global commitment to reduce overall carbonemissions because, as Bolsonaro implied during his remarks, overly restrictive environmental regulations could impair a nation’s economic growth and development.
Britain is working towards the long-term goal of reaching net-zero carbonemissions by 2050. This small handful of countries is part of an elite club, the Alliance of Carbon-Negative Countries. All three countries have relatively modest emissions and extensive areas of forestry for their size. Suriname is 93% rainforest.
Reusing venues and replacing fossil fuel with renewable energy use is essential to cutting emissions at a large sporting event. Approximately 95% of venues for the Paris Games will be pre-existing or temporary facilities, and this factor alone is expected to reduce carbonemissions by one million tonnes compared to new buildings.
Over the last year Brazil has seen numerous innovative climate litigation claims filed that have questioned the country’s climate policies and general effects of activities on climatechange. (I The Amazon rainforest, the country’s not-so-secret weapon to mitigate climatechange, features prominently in the litigation.
This applies to food resources such as fish, habitats such as rainforests, cultural monuments as a mark of respect for their human interest. It is also believed that the spread of tree canopy has accelerated the warming already being triggered by carbonemissions (35). Energy Conservation. Consider an energy policy degree.
On behalf of environmentalists everywhere, I would like to formally apologize for the climate scare we created over the last 30 years. Climatechange is happening. I have been a climate activist for 20 years and an environmentalist for 30. Lire en français ici. Leer en español aquí. It’s just not the end of the world.
In a long interview last year, Nepstad was shockingly candid with me about the harms perpetrated by the environmental NGO community in the Amazon, including how their efforts had contributed to the fragmentation of the rainforest. Notably, however, Nepstad did not request any corrections to my article in our conversation, nor has he since.
Student in the Department of Animal Sciences and CSU AgNext at Colorado State University The role of cattle in climatechange has been an important topic for decades, sparking debate among scientists, producers, policymakers, and consumers. of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (Gerber et al., methane emissions (EPA, 2022).
At the start of the recent COP 27 climate meeting in Egypt, a United Nations report on the role of financial institutions in controlling climatechange said, “There is no room for new investment in fossil fuel supply.”. Climatechange is a material risk, but it is only one factor in an investment decision.” .
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE #130: FEATURED CASE. and non-U.S.
At stake was the ability to reduce carbonemissions as written in the ‘Clean Power Plan’ regulation under the auspices of the Clean Air Act that gives the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) power to regulate “the best system of reducing emissions.” EXPLAINER: Why Court’s EPA-climatechange ruling matters – Associated Press.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content