This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
is a serious blow to the EPA’s ability to fight climatechange—and could have dangerous repercussions beyond this case. The timing of the decision feels especially harsh, as the nation is in the throes of the “ Danger Season ” for hazards such as heat waves, drought, wildfires and hurricanes, all worsened by climatechange.
The foundational document of international human rights law is the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But it is less often acknowledged in climate science and policy circles that cultural heritage is a human right vital for people’s sense of identity and wellbeing, and for the vitality, stability, and resilience of their communities.
It’s also one of the countries that’s least prepared to adapt to climatechange, which will be much worse by then. The Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative rankings show that Nigeria as the 17 th most vulnerable countries in the world to climatechange. ” Climatechange will only make things worse.
In preparing to teach a course on climatelaw, I was really struck by how broad and rich the field has become. Back in the day, it was nearly all international law, but nowadays there’s a huge amount of U.S. domestic law. and international law. and international law. climate policy. Here goes: I.
With economic growth have come carbonemissions. As of 2016, half of its total emissions are from the power sector, with 20% from industry and 15% from transportation, and. South Korea also agreed to join the Global Methane Pledge and cut emissions one third by 2030. What he does while in office remains to be seen.
In response, some state policy makers and advocates are now considering legal avenues to effectively require the use of sustainable aviation fuels, which emit less carbon than traditional jet fuel when burned and in some cases can eliminate these emissions altogether.
Not to be outdone, 19 Republican state attorneys general also joined the fray in August, falsely claiming that “woke” asset managers are politicizing their investments by adopting ESG criteria instead of focusing solely on financial returns, as required by law, at the expense of their state pension funds. (No
In this vein, 2024 included advances like Massachusettss new clean energy law , which will streamline equitable siting for clean energy projects. 2024 also saw many fruits of federal policy, notably the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act , including tax credits for households, businesses, and renewable energy project owners.
This being Cinco de Mayo, it seems like an appropriate time for a look at Mexico’s climate challenges. Mexico’s carbonemissions are about the same as those of Texas, the highest-emitting US state. Per capita emissions, however, are far lower, given Mexico’s much larger population.
That made an investor revolt last week over the giant mining company’s climate disclosures especially notable. It’s also notable that this took place in London, showing that investor worries about climatechange are worldwide. Even before last week’s investor revolt, the company was under pressure to address climatechange.
Today marks one year since the precedent-setting court ruling in the Netherlands, which ordered Shell to cut its activities’ carbonemissions by 45 percent compared to 2019 levels to align with the Paris climate agreement. N ovel Approaches to Climate Litigation.
The Liberals had done as little as possible to address climatechange. So the change in government is more than welcome. The outgoing Liberals weren’t helped electorally by their foot-dragging about climatechange. Polling showed broad public support for more aggressive cuts in carbonemissions.
On a per capita basis, Australia’s carbonemissions are even higher than the United States. A decade ago, Australia had a climate tax. In 2022, the Labor coalition passed a law mandating that Australia cut greenhouse gas emissions 43% below 2005 levels by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2050.
This is related to the “polluter pays” principle, but it ties compensation to harm that is occurring today because of past carbonemissions, rather than compensation for future harm due to current emissions. This suggests that a country’s responsibility for climatechange should be based on its share of global consumption.
In a pathbreaking opinion, the German Constitutional Court ordered the government to adopt much stricter emissions targets for 2030. Those targets are to be keyed to achieving the Paris Agreement’s goal of keeping climatechange below 2 °C and as close to 1.5 °C C as possible.
In teaching my class on ClimateLaw, I’ve been struck by how many new legal questions courts are confronting as a result of the climate crisis. One set of issues relates to applying existing statutes to climatechange. What kinds of interventions does the law allow in order to save a species?
A month from now, the Supreme Court will hear a case about an animal cruelty law. It’s not an environmental law case, but the ruling could impact the authority of states to address climatechange. The problem is drawing a line, since many laws by a state as big as California have economic impacts elsewhere.
In December 2018, after having successfully reduced greenhouse gas emissions from the power sector by 53.3%, a majority of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) jurisdictions announced plans to design a program to address carbonemissions from the combustion of transportation fuels.
Climatechange could hike the cost of maintaining Ontario ’s transportation infrastructure by over $1.5 Remedies for Harmful Algal Blooms Are Available in Law and Practice — Circle of Blue. ClimateChange Could Cost Ontario Over $1 Billion Every Year. Laura Gersony, Fresh Editor. This Week’s Watersheds.
He did not, of course, mention the word climatechange. But his speech endorsing the measure left no doubt about his awareness of a changing world: “Since day one, the resiliency of our state has been a top priority for my administration. We’re past the time when climate adaptation was a optional topic for discussion.
In terms of climate policy, however, it doesn’t get nearly as much attention as China. That’s understandable in terms of India’s current carbonemissions, which are now only a quarter of China’s. But given the growth of the economy, carbonemissions were projected to continuing growing steadily through 2030.
State clean energy laws have been bedeviled by challenges based on this doctrine. As an example, consider laws that encourage a state’s utilities to buy power from renewables. Those laws encourage the construction of new solar and wind in nearby states, while causing coal plants to lose market share and potentially close.
CO 2 emissions remain mostly level through 2050—nowhere close to meeting US climate goals. Carbonemissions remain high. These projections show that without additional policies or incentives, the US is very much in danger of not meeting our climate goals. This year’s projections are a bit grim.
Texas and a number of other states have passed laws banning what they call “boycotts of fossil fuel companies.” Besides being fundamentally misguided and difficult to implement, these blacklist laws are incompetently drafted and quite likely unconstitutional. B) does business with a company described by Paragraph (A).”.
The same is true in environmental law. Was it a fundamental paradigm shift, re-centering the law on new values? With all this in mind, here are the cases that I see as making up the canon and anti-canons of environmental law. It was the first case in which the Court was confronted with the issue of climatechange.
One option, a tax on carbon dioxide emissions, gets the most attention but seems politically impossible. The closest we’ve ever come to a carbon tax is a limited fee on methane emissions under the new IRA law. If a carbon tax were politically feasible, there would be a lot to be said in its favor.
The US Supreme Court’s recent decision dramatically limiting EPA’s ability to curb carbonemissions is bad news for our fight against climatechange. With a legislative session that’s about to wrap up, getting the bill into law will require diplomacy and ambition. Where things stand.
A federal court in Australia ruled that the government had a “duty of care” toward its young people to protect them from climatechange. Historically, Exxon has been the most recalcitrant of all the major oil companies, and it has been a major funder of climatechange denial.
The Federal Cabinet adopts its first climate target, a 25-30% cut in carbonemissions by 2005 under 1987 levels. Note: the estimates of 1990 emissions that I found are not entirely consistent, with one estimate closer to 1.2 Climatelaw makes emission targets legally binding 2019. trillion tons.]
The possibility of snagging some of this funding may also help nudge some lagging states to think seriously about cutting carbonemissions. Under the Clean Air Act, California has the unique ability to set its own standards for tailpipe emissions from new vehicles, including greenhouse gases. Download as PDF.
Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act, providing $369 billion in tax credit and spending to reduce carbonemissions. The Democrats lost control of Congress, eliminating the chances for significant climate/energy legislation in the next two years. It will reduce cumulative GHG emissions by an estimated 6.3
Here’s an embarrassing confession: Though I had taught environmental law for 25 years at that point, I had never heard of section 111(d) until it was discussed as possible tool to limit carbonemissions. The Court called that provision obscure. I can’t contest that view.
Some boards already have former EPA officials or even, in at least one case, an environmental law professor. To make that work, however, we would need to supplement the current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to include rules for accounting for carbonemissions and other environmental impacts.
Judge Larisa Alwin ordered Shell to reduce its carbonemissions by 45% by 2030 from 2019 levels. “The court orders Royal Dutch Shell, by means of its corporate policy, to reduce its CO2 emissions by 45% by 2030 with respect to the level of 2019 for the Shell group, and the suppliers and customers of the group.”
The bad news is that we’re not yet on track to avoid dangerous climatechange. climate policy. New California legislation will require corporations to disclose their carbonemissions. Climate policy has been boosted by dramatic changes in the economics of clean energy.
The Decision text of COP26 completed the Rulebook by resolving sticky issues on fundamental norms related to carbonemission markets under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement (PA). The Rulebook sets out the functioning of international carbon markets to support global cooperation on ambitious emission reductions.
But the next phase of market-based programs for reducing GHG emissions raises significant questions for policymakers, from nitty-gritty design issues like measuring and reporting mechanisms to bigger picture concerns such as whether these systems can reduce pollution at the pace needed to meet climate goals.
Although Canadian financial institutions have taken baby steps to advance climate-aligned finance, regulations still lag behind international best practices. Canada’s financial sector continues to worsen the effects of climatechange and create systemic financial risks.
Meanwhile, the launch ceremony for China’s emissions trading program will be held on Friday. The system will involve over 2000 firms, accounting for one-seventh of global carbonemissions. The delays were apparently due to gaps in emissions data along with political maneuvering.
UCS along with more than 100,000 members of the public have written in support of this national rule that will gather the scattered and incomplete data counting greenhouse gas emissions into a unified standard so local, state, and federal transportation authorities can make informed decisions. They just need to put them together.
A multi-decade legal history, including four Supreme Court decisions, has led to unimpeachable clarity on this one point: EPA has a statutory obligation to regulate carbonemissions from power plants under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act. EPA ruling, EPA can still establish rigorous carbonemissions standards.
Between one and three per cent of all energy used worldwide powers Artificial Intelligence, some of which is being used to power such essential services as revealing what your mother-in-law would look like if she were a cat. First, carbon capture has not yet proven to be even modestly effective in reducing carbonemissions.
Brazil: When a court accepts the legally disruptive nature of climatechange. The decision suggests that courts can reconcile the legally disruptive nature of climatechange with the fundamental role that adjudication plays in maintaining the stability of legal orders, and it could influence other cases and decisions across the world.
Despite Shell’s insistence that it’s a climate champion, it has chosen to stay aligned with CAPP, whose toxic, secretive influence has killed or undermined laws that were designed to protect public health, cut pollution, and curb carbonemissions – including during the COVID-19 crisis. . Increasing them a lot.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content