This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Sealevels are rising, and science shows they will continue to rise for generations due to heat-trapping emissions that have already been released. Understanding sealevel rise as a long-term, multi-generational problem is essential to comprehending the scale of climate change and the need for bold action now.
In an era when massive heat domes blanket large swaths of continents for days, wildfires burn through areas the size of small countries, and hurricanes regularly push the limits of what we once thought possible, sealevel rise can seem like extreme weather’s low-key cousin. Since 1993, sealevel has risen by an average rate of 3.1
A new dataset released by InfluenceMap provides information on heat-trapping emissions traced to the 122 largest investor and state-owned fossilfuel companies in the world. Fossilfuels are the main driver of climate change and the terrifying effects of it that we see happening across the world.
In an important win for climate accountability in the United States, the US Supreme Court decided that lawsuits filed in Colorado, Maryland, California, Hawai’i, and Rhode Island against fossilfuel companies including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, Suncor, and others will remain in state courts.
While there is enormous potential for UN climate negotiations to transform climate action, meaningful progress has been delayed in part by the fossilfuel industry’s deceptive tactics. Last year’s COP was notable as the first to explicitly mention “fossilfuels” in the final decision document.
By comparing these two data sets, scientists can determine the probability that human activities are responsible for observed changes in temperature, precipitation patterns, sealevel rise, and other climate change indicators.
The main objectives included: Approving and adopting outlines for the three major working group reports and an additional methodology report on carbondioxide removal (CDR). Fossilfuels, which are central to mitigation discussions but were largely avoided, reflecting ongoing political tensions.
The main objectives included: Approving and adopting outlines for the three major working group reports and an additional methodology report on carbondioxide removal (CDR). Fossilfuels, which are central to mitigation discussions but were largely avoided, reflecting ongoing political tensions.
GOM communities, not fossilfuel interests, should determine policies that affect GOM people. He was on to something And the lobsterman was correct: we can blame carbon emissions for ocean acidification and warming in the Gulf of Maine. Sealevels are rising. They should be held accountable for their actions.”
Now the same district court has gone further, again in favor of environmental groups but now against Royal Dutch Shell (“Shell”) , the world’s largest non-state-owned fossilfuel company. In fact, Shell has the most ambitious emissions abatement plan of all fossilfuel companies , for whatever that is worth.)
Fossilfuels are the root cause of climate change, of long-standing environmental injustices, and are also frequently connected to geopolitical strife and violent conflicts. Other countries are dependent upon these fossilfuels, they don’t make themselves free of them. This is a fossilfuel war.
If people everywhere stopped burning fossilfuels tomorrow, stored heat would still continue to warm the atmosphere. But that doesn’t mean the planet returns to its preindustrial climate or that we avoid disruptive effects such as sea-level rise. Photo credit: Aliraza Khatri’s Photography via Getty Images.
For the AMOC (and other climate tipping points ), the only action we can take to minimise the risk is to get out of fossilfuels and stop deforestation as fast as possible. In 2022, the G20 governments alone subsidised fossilfuel use with 1.4 In 2022, the G20 governments alone subsidised fossilfuel use with 1.4
volume mixing ratio), together with a number of trace gases, such as argon (0.93% volume mixing ratio), helium, radiatively active greenhouse gases such as carbondioxide (0.035% volume mixing ratio), and ozone. Fluorocarbons Carbon-fluorine compounds that often contain other elements such as hydrogen, chlorine, or bromine.
Recent science doesn’t support this optimism, as new studies show that the increased release of Black Carbon, one of the most potent climate change forcers—as well as soot, carbondioxide, methane and ozone from more traffic in the Arctic—could lead to a 20% increase in the global heating that is causing warmer ocean temperatures.
We know that burning fossilfuels is the main cause of anthropogenic climate change, and that climate change is the source of adverse impacts on communities and even regional and national economies. by Justin Gundlach. These points are largely undisputed. Peter Frumhoff led off, presenting two key points.
The Governor approved a notable slate of climate legislation with a package that includes more stringent greenhouse gas (GHG) emission targets and measures designed to reduce the state’s reliance on fossilfuels. In signing these bills, the Governor touted the state as the most aggressive actor on climate in the nation. Clean Energy.
We can decrease production of virgin plastic that comes from fossilfuels and pollutes our ocean as well. We can protect coastal habitats, like mangroves and sea grasses, which can serve as critical tools to guard communities from intensifying storms while also safely storing carbondioxide from the atmosphere.
Warmer temperatures will encourage the melting of glaciers, ice fields, summer Arctic sea ice, and permafrost, some of which may be irreversible. Sealevels will continue to rise throughout the 21st century, contributing to more frequent and severe coastal flooding in low-lying areas along coasts around the world.
In the first months of 2024, legislators in four states— Maryland , Massachusetts , New York , and Vermont —have pushed for legislation that would collectively require large fossilfuel producers and refiners to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars of state-level climate adaptation infrastructure.
The database does not include six Congressional references to sealevel rise (such as in appropriations to the Department of Defense to help preparing military bases) that did not explicitly mention climate change. That approach would have required a shift from coal to energy sources that emit less carbondioxide.
It is worth noting that if all ice melt in Antarctica, sealevel would rise by 60 meters (around 200 feet). This could increase the speed of climate change even more as this greenhouse gas is 24 times more potent than carbondioxide. Is Mankind ready to change this drastically and do it fast ?
Specifically, they allege the government has knowingly caused carbondioxidelevels to rise in a way that compromises the climate system, threatening human health and welfare. Cities and states are fighting back against high carbon-emitting industries, too. New York v. Exxon Mobil. For example, a.
The release of carbondioxide to the atmosphere by the burning of fossilfuels is, conceiveably, the most important environmental issue in the world today. — "Costs and benefits of carbondioxide," Nature , May 3, 1979. The limits of adaptation.
That 2013 headline resulted from the first effort to quantify emissions from the ‘carbon majors’ —fossilfuel companies and cement manufacturers whose businesses have contributed an outsized amount of heat-trapping gases to the atmosphere. Nearly two-thirds of industrial heat-trapping emissions can be traced to just 90 entities.
Fossilfuel : Any mineralized formerly organic material extracted from the ground and used in energy production: coal, natural gas, oil. They are water vapor, carbondioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, CFCs, and hydrofluorocarbons. We are already seeing the depletion of the ice caps and rising sealevels.
And even a slight rise in sealevel makes the threat of a storm surge that more terrifying. Regrettably, in the absence of a threat that is immediate and palpable, like a hurricane, the concept in practice has often been an oxymoron, with states litigating to undermine or reject national programs to reduce carbon emissions.
Titled The FossilFuels Behind Forest Fires , it provides a concise overview of the peer-reviewed study and makes policy recommendations for the Biden administration and Congress. CP: Major fossilfuel companies and their trade groups knew that burning fossilfuels would dramatically reshape our climate since at least the 1960s.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres stated that we’re in a “ code red for humanity ” and called for an end to fossilfuel production and exploration, along with a massive transition to renewable energy, to mitigate climate change. Over the next 10 years, the fossilfuel industry in the U.S.
Fourth Circuit Declined to Stay Remand Order in Baltimore’s Climate Case Against FossilFuel Companies; Companies Sought Stay from Supreme Court. Citing Resiliency and SeaLevel Rise Concerns, Environmental Groups and California Challenged Negative Jurisdictional Determination for Redwood City Salt Ponds. FEATURED CASE.
China is not the only country in the frame: major fossilfuel producers including Saudi Arabia, Russia and Australia have also refused to strengthen their commitments. above pre-industrial levels, and greenhouse gas emissions are still on an upward trend. Fossilfuel use must also end. An increase of 1.5C
BLM estimates that the project will produce up to 576 million barrels of oil over its 30-year lifetime, resulting in indirect emissions totaling 239 million metric tons of carbondioxide (CO 2 ) equivalent. direct temperature stress, ocean acidification, sealevel rise, extreme events, and alterations to food chains).
billion tons of carbondioxide emissions by 2050. In 2022, Texas, along with several other states and industry groups representing fuel manufacturers (together, Petitioners), challenged EPA’s new emissions standards in court. Heat waves can also cause costly infrastructure damage in cities and exacerbate air pollution.
The federal district court for the Northern District of California denied Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change public nuisance lawsuits against five major fossilfuel producers to state court. Based FossilFuel Companies Filed Motions to Dismiss New York City’s Climate Change Lawsuit.
Casey, Colleagues: Introduce Bill To Empower FossilFuel Workers To Train, Find Jobs In Changing Energy Industry [PaEN] -- Patch.com: Chester County Commissioners Adopt New Climate Action Plan -- ReadingE: Muhlenberg Twp. Wolf, AG Shapiro To Support A Total Ban On Road Dumping Of Oil & Gas Drilling Wastewater; 240.4
Attorneys general (AGs) in the five states most vulnerable to climate change, however, are doing the exact opposite: Instead of defending their constituents, they are defending the fossilfuel industry. Here’s a roundup of what these AGs have been doing to make a bad situation worse.
A climate change-related argument rejected by the trial court—that sealevel rise projections in the Plan were too high and not based on best available science—did not appear to have been before the appellate court. The fossilfuel companies asked the court to grant only a 30-day extension.
The plaintiffs alleged that Peabody (and a number of other fossilfuel companies) caused greenhouse gas emissions that resulted in sealevel rise and damage to their property. Peabody, a coal company, filed for bankruptcy in April 2016 and emerged from bankruptcy under a plan that became effective on April 3, 2017.
And in summary, his testimony says, one, joining RGGI will reduce emissions of carbondioxide from Pennsylvania's power generation sector and will also contribute to improved air quality. You cannot have cleaner green energy projects without fossilfuel. This will benefit the health of many Pennsylvanians.
Several states and industry groups are challenging EPA’s 2024 rules which set greenhouse gas emissions limits for certain fossilfuel power plants nationwide (referred to here as the Power Plant Rules). EPA that carbondioxide and other greenhouse gases fall within the Clean Air Act’s capacious definition of “air pollutant.”
Supreme Court denied fossilfuel companies’ petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision reversing the district court’s 2018 denial of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change nuisance cases to California state court. DECISIONS & SETTLEMENTS. On June 14, 2021, the U.S.
National Audubon Society alleged that the rule “vastly expands potential sand mining projects in delicate coastal barriers” and further alleged that coastal barriers would become even more important due to climate change and were expected to mitigate $108 billion of sealevel rise and flooding damages over the next 50 years.
Maryland County Filed Climate Change Lawsuit Against FossilFuel Companies and Trade Group. Annapolis, a city in the county, previously filed a separate lawsuit against fossilfuel companies.) Exxon Mobil Corp. , 451071/2021 (N.Y.
The SCC is a metric that seeks to capture all of the costs that emitting a ton of carbondioxide (or equivalent amounts of other greenhouse gases such as methane) imposes on society by contributing to climate change over the hundreds of years it remains in the atmosphere. N: Missouri v. Biden , Civ. 4:21-cv-00287-SPM (E.D.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content