This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The future trajectories are based on different scenarios, such as versions of the future where the world comes together to take action and phase out fossilfuels, or versions where fossilfuel production continues throughout this century.
Production and combustion of fossilfuels imposes enormous costs on society, which the industry doesn’t pay for. One option, a tax on carbondioxide emissions, gets the most attention but seems politically impossible. A more promising alternative might be a clean-up tax on the fossilfuel industry.
The decision at the Glasgow climate conference to phase down fossilfuels is an important step forward — and not just because of climate change. We think of fossilfuels as a source of climate change, but that’s only a one part of the problem. Fossilfuels are a case in point. Consider coal.
In an important win for climate accountability in the United States, the US Supreme Court decided that lawsuits filed in Colorado, Maryland, California, Hawai’i, and Rhode Island against fossilfuel companies including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, Suncor, and others will remain in state courts.
Indiana regulates the underground storage of carbondioxide. In central Illinois , residents are reluctant to make way for an underground carbondioxide pipeline. Residents of central Illinois are organizing against a proposed carbondioxide pipeline, Energy News Network reports. In the News.
Candidate at UCLA Law (2L) Last week, Assemblymember Dr. Joaquin Arambula introduced AB 2623 , a bill designed to guard California communities against the dangers of transporting carbondioxide in pipelines. You might be familiar with carbondioxide as a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change.
The burning of fossilfuels and other human activities are continuing to cause rapid temperature rise. Scientists have identified a number of land- and ocean-based carbondioxide removal (CDR) approaches. Marine CDR approaches appear to hold great potential for uptake and sequestration of carbondioxide.
City of New York , plumbing and building trade groups challenged New York Citys Local Law 154 of 2021 , a piece of legislation that prohibits fossilfuel combustion in most new buildings. This blog post discusses Local Law 154, unpacks Judge Abrams decision, and ends with a refresher on California Restaurant Association v.
Plastics are made from fossilfuels and over 16,000 different chemicals. Plastics are made from fossilfuels and over 16,000 different chemicals. Because plastics are produced from fossilfuels the lifecycle of plastics has a huge carbondioxide footprint and is a driver of climate change.
Now the same district court has gone further, again in favor of environmental groups but now against Royal Dutch Shell (“Shell”) , the world’s largest non-state-owned fossilfuel company. Under Dutch tort law, the standard of care is that “acting in conflict with what is generally accepted according to unwritten law is unlawful.”
Drawing on research by the Union of Concerned Scientists and others, the commission report found that fossilfuel companies fully understood their products’ impact on climate as early as 1965, when their own scientists discovered them. The commission’s trailblazing work is only the beginning.
thus, it is crucial that we address carbon emissions from power plants. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently published a proposed rule which would limit carbon pollution from fossilfuel burning power plants, a move which is critically important, statutorily required, and long overdue.
Our national overreliance on gas is evidently undermining energy access, not strengthening it, as some fossilfuel industry players would want you to believe. These claims just add to the deluge of greenwashing and disinformation from the fossilfuel industry. Don’t believe the industry spin.
The term “oil” is only mentioned twice in this summary, and only in connection with carbon capture and storage and methane emissions. The term “fossilfuels”, however, is mentioned 16 times. I had to look up the acronym “CDR” (Carbondioxide removal). C or 2°C since preindustrial times (p.
Responsible for 12 percent of all US global warming emissions from human activities, methane traps significantly more heat per molecule than carbondioxide, making it 86 times more harmful for the first 20 years after it is released into the atmosphere. Its primary component is methane.
Switching from fossilfuels like gasoline to increasingly clean electricity sources is vital for hitting climate and air pollution goals. Burning gasoline in an automobile produces carbondioxide, the primary cause of climate change. pounds of carbondioxide emissions per gallon.
Background Japan has heavily relied on the use of fossilfuels for its power generation. According to the Japanese Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, the countrys fossilfuel dependency was 83.2% This blog post provides an overview of those cases and the broader landscape of climate litigation in Japan.
” Prioritizing fossilfuels over renewable energy in 2023 for insubstantial reasons does not pass strict scrutiny. That’s not unique to Montana , even though this case focused on state laws. The decision builds off of the plaintiffs’ own proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. They’ll have to be pushed.
I applaud Governor Shapiros continued support for Community Solar and look forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to get it signed into law. Solar panels do not emit carbondioxide, methane, nitrogen oxides, or other harmful air pollutants when theyre working.
Assessments by the IPCC have made clear that the most feasible way for the world to meet its target of restricting climate change to below two degrees Celsius of warming includes rapid and massive expansion of carbon removal technology – technology that would extract carbondioxide and permanently sequester that carbondioxide underground.
The bench trial took place last month in the state capitol, Helena, where 16 youth plaintiffs ages 5 to 22 made the case that Montana’s unwavering promotion of fossilfuels violates the state constitution’s guarantee to a “clean and healthful environment.” Whether Montana’s GHG emissions can be measured incrementally.
Human activity adds more than 50 gigatons of carbondioxide to the atmosphere each year. New Solid Carbon technology might be able to lock climate-warming carbondioxide below ocean bedrock. Large-scale solutions are urgently needed. Photo credit: Francisco Anzola, Flickr CC BY 2.0. By Dr Kate Moran.
CT , the Supreme Court said this: We hold that the Clean Air Act and the EPA actions it authorizes displace any federal common law right to seek abatement of carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel fired power plants. at 528–529. 410 (2011). Post, at 20. We answered no, given the existence of Section 111(d).
So, to help anyone who may be interested in unraveling the dynamic landscape of hydrogen law and policy, I’ll be preparing a series of posts to help lawyers and advocates gain a deeper understanding of this landscape. kg of carbondioxide emissions. kg of carbondioxide emissions per kilowatt-hour of energy produced.
We know that burning fossilfuels is the main cause of anthropogenic climate change, and that climate change is the source of adverse impacts on communities and even regional and national economies. by Justin Gundlach. These points are largely undisputed. Peter Frumhoff led off, presenting two key points.
Since 2010, there have been 76 incidents involving carbondioxide pipelines in the US. For example, a carbondioxide pipeline exploded in Satartia, Mississippi in 2020 and a carbondioxide pipeline leaked in Louisiana in April 2024.
BLM projects that it will produce 576 million barrels of oil over its 30-year lifetime, resulting in indirect emissions totaling 239 million metric tons of carbondioxide (CO 2 ) equivalent. The project is controversial due to both its location and its climate impacts. C and approximately equal to the remaining budget for 2.0°C.
With proposed federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions by the Securities and Exchange Commission requiring GHG disclosure and new state statutes, including a new Maryland law that requires not only disclosure, but also a mandated reduction in GHG emissions, a greater appreciation of the subject of GHG appears in order.
And it’s been one month since the Montana First District Court determined that the state of Montana had indeed violated Montana youth’s right to a “clean and healthful environment” by collaborating with the fossilfuel industry. As a young person and a UCLA Law student, the importance of the Held trial is not lost on me.
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) invests in public charging infrastructure, including through the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) extends and makes changes to the federal tax credit for charging infrastructure.
It is a highly professional and analytically competent organization, rather conservative, and quite sympathetic to the perspectives and business needs of the energy sector, including fossil-fuel producers. Augustine , they are praying, “Lord, make me Carbon-neutral … but not yet.”. To paraphrase St.
If passed, this new law would finally put an end to the millions of tonnes of coal – the world’s dirtiest and deadliest fossilfuel – that are shipped overseas from Canada’ west coast every year. When burnt, that amount of coal would produce 40 million tonnes of carbondioxide, or the equivalent of 8.7
On Tuesday, May 9, the Sabin Center and the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment launched Transferred Emissions are Still Emissions: Why FossilFuel Asset Sales Need Enhanced Transparency and Carbon Accounting. Fossilfuel asset sales do not just shift greenhouse gas emissions, but may increase them.
Since then, the Conservative government has made a series of U-turns on its own net zero policies, attacked Labour’s green spending plans, and doubled down on its support for new fossilfuel projects, approving more than 100 new North Sea oil and gas licences. This comes as DeSmog and Democracy for Sale reveal that £6.8
The Governor approved a notable slate of climate legislation with a package that includes more stringent greenhouse gas (GHG) emission targets and measures designed to reduce the state’s reliance on fossilfuels. Implementation of these new laws will be the true test of that statement, but they provide an exciting starting point.
SMR requires steam, heat, and pressure to convert methane (in natural gas) to hydrogen and carbon monoxide. SMR is a high-carbon process that uses fossilfuels for process heat. They typically refer to fossil SMR hydrogen as “ grey ” hydrogen. We make hydrogen mainly using steam methane reforming (“SMR”).
They added that due to the increase in climate-friendly policies and laws we have seen enhanced energy efficiency, reduced deforestation rates and accelerated the deployment of renewable energy. They pointed to the fact that since 2010 the cost of solar, wind and battery technology has decreased by up to 85%.
Since 2019, more than seventy local and state jurisdictions have followed Berkeley’s lead in requiring or strongly incentivizing all-electric or fossil-fuel-free new buildings, with more considering similar approaches. can be fueled by natural gas), and must base these options on a defensible “one-for-one” basis.
This framework includes a multi-jurisdictional cap-and-invest program, under which certain fuel suppliers will be required to acquire compliance instruments called “allowances” to cover carbondioxide emissions from specified fuels (i.e., fossil-based gasoline and diesel).
The applicants sought an injunction declaring that Shell is legally bound to reduce its carbondioxide (CO2) emissions by 45% below 2019 levels by 2030. This leads to an important distinction between fossilfuels specifically produced or merely traded by Shell, as discussed in more detail below. Royal Dutch Shell.
With respect to financing and infrastructure, there have been significant new developments in recent weeks including DOE’s selection of 12 CCS projects ( [link] ) and the President’s action to sign into law the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Title III, Subtitle A, ( [link] ) which provides grant funds for CCUS infrastructure.
Ebel, the CEO of Enbridge, to our list of infamous Climate Villains – powerful people with fossilfuel interests holding Canada back from effective climate action. The executives behind the fossilfuel industry often avoid public scrutiny, which is why we’re shining the spotlight on their activities.
(This post was authored by Eric Peshkin, a JD candidate at NYU School of Law and CLEE summer research assistant). While burning methane to generate energy releases carbondioxide into the atmosphere, the overall climate impact is reduced and the gas could potentially replace fossilfuel sources.)
“If any applications are awarded funding by the DOE, Pennsylvania will face the buildout of more fossilfuel infrastructure such as power plants and pipelines, including dangerous, unregulated carbondioxide (CO2) pipelines across Pennsylvania and decades of fracking. It’s Up To The Feds [PaEN] -- Gov.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content