This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The fossilfuel industry has long been the main driver of climate change, but Big Oil’s CEOs and profiteers would like you to believe that it is a part of the solution. One of the people peddling this idea is the man behind Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) – Murray Edwards, the FossilFuel Fanatic.
The future trajectories are based on different scenarios, such as versions of the future where the world comes together to take action and phase out fossilfuels, or versions where fossilfuel production continues throughout this century.
Scientists are sounding the alarm because this warming is shockingly bigbigger than what we would have expected given the long-term warming trend from fossilfuel-caused climate change. Meanwhile, sharply cutting our use of fossilfuels is the best way to limit carbondioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, the primary driver of climate change.
A new dataset released by InfluenceMap provides information on heat-trapping emissions traced to the 122 largest investor and state-owned fossilfuel companies in the world. Fossilfuels are the main driver of climate change and the terrifying effects of it that we see happening across the world.
Yet, driven by vested interests in the fossilfuel industry , misleading narratives aim to distort and hinder meaningful climate commitments. Fossilfuels are the problem It’s pretty simple: the burning of fossilfuels is the main driver of climate change. billion tons of the 40.5
Production and combustion of fossilfuels imposes enormous costs on society, which the industry doesn’t pay for. One option, a tax on carbondioxide emissions, gets the most attention but seems politically impossible. A more promising alternative might be a clean-up tax on the fossilfuel industry.
In an important win for climate accountability in the United States, the US Supreme Court decided that lawsuits filed in Colorado, Maryland, California, Hawai’i, and Rhode Island against fossilfuel companies including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, Suncor, and others will remain in state courts.
Indiana regulates the underground storage of carbondioxide. In central Illinois , residents are reluctant to make way for an underground carbondioxide pipeline. Residents of central Illinois are organizing against a proposed carbondioxide pipeline, Energy News Network reports.
One scope is the narrow carbon picture , the one that you’ll hear about most readily: what these approaches mean in terms of how much carbondioxide (CO 2 ) comes out of a gas plant’s smokestack, or how much less a plant can be said to be emitting. And we don’t need to have all the answers to make a difference.
Despite urgent calls to slash fossilfuel use to meet climate targets, the Global Carbon Budget report shows that 2023 emissions will be about 1.1 per cent higher than last year
If we are to protect the ocean, its marine ecosystems and the people who depend on them, we must address climate change at its root: the burning of fossilfuels for energy. Wind energy produces roughly only 11 grams of carbondioxide per kilowatt-hour (g CO2/kWh) of electricity generated. Together we can change course.
The burning of fossilfuels and other human activities are continuing to cause rapid temperature rise. Scientists have identified a number of land- and ocean-based carbondioxide removal (CDR) approaches. Marine CDR approaches appear to hold great potential for uptake and sequestration of carbondioxide.
Union of Concerned Scientists’ (UCS) research shows that top fossilfuel producers’ emissions are responsible for as much as half of global surface temperature increase. Updated analysis from 2020 shows that emissions traced to the 88 largest carbon producers contributed approximately 60 percent?of
Compared to carbondioxide (CO2), methane doesn’t linger for long in the atmosphere after being emitted. New science has shown that the largest fossilfuel, dairy, and waste methane super-emitters contribute a sizeable fraction of the total methane emissions in the regions the study authors monitored.
Because one of Pennsylvania’s two hubs, ARCH2, is also proposing to be heavily reliant on fossilfuel-based hydrogen production projects, I also detailed the serious risks of policymakers propping up such an approach. Here are three critical flags with pursuing a fossil-based “clean” hydrogen future.
The IPCC enables decision-makers to move beyond fossilfuel industry-generated deception and disinformation about climate change, providing them with the science needed to make informed decisions. It’s crucial that our leaders have access to comprehensive and accurate science to guide their choices.
The main objectives included: Approving and adopting outlines for the three major working group reports and an additional methodology report on carbondioxide removal (CDR). Fossilfuels, which are central to mitigation discussions but were largely avoided, reflecting ongoing political tensions.
This includes loopholes related to biomethane, whereby heavily polluting fossilfuel-fired hydrogen production facilities—the very facilities the tax credit is trying to incentivize a shift away from—can cloak themselves as “clean” and reap full tax credit rewards, without having done anything but pushed around paper.
It is 80 times stronger than carbondioxide (CO2) at trapping heat on short timescales. Methane emissions come from two main sources : fossilfuels and agriculture—primarily animal-based agriculture. At COP27, 636 registered attendees are lobbyists for the fossilfuel industry.
Scientists have long known that burning fossilfuels is the primary cause of the increase in atmospheric carbondioxide concentrations, but now they can identify the specific sources.
In addition, environmental justice advocates and frontline communities routinely point to the danger of concentrated carbondioxide , embedded siting inequities , and the use of CCS to distract from the real work of phasing out fossilfuels.) Who needs units anyway?
but it inevitably brings forth a mish-mash of half-remembered, inappropriate or out-of-date comparisons between the impacts of carbondioxide and methane. There is also a very small impact of the CH 4 oxidation to CO 2 itself for any fossil-fuel derived methane. (a) Stocks and flows. References. Etminan, G. Myhre, E.J.
European emissions of carbondioxide from energy use over the past three months are down 5 percent from the previous year as the energy crisis drives up the price of fossilfuels. But Europe's efforts to shore up supplies of natural gas could lock in a new source of emissions, a new analysis finds. Read more on E360 ?.
Ethylene oxide is a chemical that is massively produced by fossilfuel industries. Since 1940, almost all industrial ethylene oxide is produced in this energy intensive process that is a heavy emitter of the greenhouse gas carbondioxide. Ethylene is made from petroleum ( crude oil and refined products).
This year will see a smaller jump in carbondioxide emissions from fossilfuels compared with 2021, driven partly by the continuing recovery of aviation following covid-19 travel restrictions
A way of distinguishing between natural carbondioxide emissions and those from burning fossilfuels could help cities and countries monitor their progress in cutting emissions
And, because the process reduces methane emissions from the sewage and displaces fossilfuel-powered energy, utilities can slash their net emissions in the process. that currently use anaerobic digestion installed an energy recovery facility, the country could reduce its annual carbondioxide emissions by 2.3
The primary cause of accelerating sea level rise is human activity As people burn fossilfuels and emit heat-trapping gases like carbondioxide, our atmosphere and our oceans warm up. First, we don’t know how much more carbondioxide, methane, and other heat-trapping gases humanity will emit in the coming decades.
Switching from fossilfuels like gasoline to increasingly clean electricity sources is vital for hitting climate and air pollution goals. Burning gasoline in an automobile produces carbondioxide, the primary cause of climate change. pounds of carbondioxide emissions per gallon.
Plastics are made from fossilfuels and over 16,000 different chemicals. Because plastics are produced from fossilfuels the lifecycle of plastics has a huge carbondioxide footprint and is a driver of climate change.
But that disguises hydrogen’s dirty secret – it actually does contribute to global heating – and is actually 33 times more powerful than carbondioxide. You can create hydrogen either using renewable energy or using fossilfuels. A new fossilfuel subsidy in 2023! The post What?
GOM communities, not fossilfuel interests, should determine policies that affect GOM people. He was on to something And the lobsterman was correct: we can blame carbon emissions for ocean acidification and warming in the Gulf of Maine. They should be held accountable for their actions.”
The main objectives included: Approving and adopting outlines for the three major working group reports and an additional methodology report on carbondioxide removal (CDR). Fossilfuels, which are central to mitigation discussions but were largely avoided, reflecting ongoing political tensions.
Drawing on research by the Union of Concerned Scientists and others, the commission report found that fossilfuel companies fully understood their products’ impact on climate as early as 1965, when their own scientists discovered them. The industry’s actions, the CHR report said, were driven “not by ignorance, but greed.”
Alito famously said that carbondioxide from fossilfuel burning, a key contributor to global warming, is not a pollutant. That is despite studies tying carbondioxide to skyrocketing rates of childhood asthma. There is evidence linking elevated carbondioxide to longer pollen seasons.
Now the same district court has gone further, again in favor of environmental groups but now against Royal Dutch Shell (“Shell”) , the world’s largest non-state-owned fossilfuel company. In fact, Shell has the most ambitious emissions abatement plan of all fossilfuel companies , for whatever that is worth.)
The term “oil” is only mentioned twice in this summary, and only in connection with carbon capture and storage and methane emissions. The term “fossilfuels”, however, is mentioned 16 times. I had to look up the acronym “CDR” (Carbondioxide removal). C or 2°C since preindustrial times (p.
Each credit one metric ton of carbondioxide equivalent pollution below the standard. I’ve written recently about why a Cap on Vegetable Oil-Based Fuels Will Stabilize and Strengthen California’s Low CarbonFuel Standard , which addresses the bio-based diesel credits. Source California Air Resources Board.
million from the DOE as part of its CarbonSAFE initiative to evaluate the feasibility of permanently storing captured carbondioxide (CO2) from industrial operations. Carbon Storage Funding Awarded to the Port of Corpus Christi appeared first on Environment + Energy Leader. The largest port in the U.S. received $16.4
Now, experts agree that … Continue reading Californians want fossilfuel companies to pay for carbon removal As the hottest summer on record comes to a close and harrowing images emerge from wildfires across California, the urgency of addressing climate change has never been greater.
There is still much we can do to bend that emissions curve sharply within this decade—but only if world leaders, especially leaders of richer countries and major emitting nations, take responsibility to act together quickly and fossilfuel companies are held accountable for their decades of obstruction and deception.
North Carolina today gets over half of its power from fossilfuels, about 25% from coal and 33% from natural gas. The new bill seeks to put North Carolina on the road to carbon neutrality. Nuclear accounts for another third, and renewables are only 11% including hydro and biomass. Solar is at 5% and wind is under 1l%.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content