This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Last month, 44 climate scientists from 15 countries wrote an open letter to the Nordic Council of Ministers highlighting the risk of a potential collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), a critical ocean current system in the Atlantic Ocean. But what exactly would cause the AMOC to collapse?
Understanding sea level rise as a long-term, multi-generational problem is essential to comprehending the scale of climatechange and the need for bold action now. While this knowledge may be sobering, it underscores the importance of reducing emissions, holding major polluters accountable, and adapting to a changing world.
Scientists are sounding the alarm because this warming is shockingly bigbigger than what we would have expected given the long-term warming trend from fossil fuel-caused climatechange. Meanwhile, sharply cutting our use of fossil fuels is the best way to limit carbondioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, the primary driver of climatechange.
The next week has the potential to bring important developments for international governance of marine carbondioxide removal (CDR). seaweed) for carbon storage. The Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange has concluded that CDR will be needed, alongside deep emissions cuts, to limit global warming to 1.5
It’s 20 years since we started blogging on climate here on RealClimate (December 10, 2004). We wanted to counter disinformation about climatechange that was spreading through various campaigns. The Keeling curve, highlighted with the release of important climate reports and climate summits.
Grade F: First major vital sign shift in its report card Different factors are at play in terms of whether the Arctic is a net sink or source of carbon. On one hand, warming temperatures increased vegetation in the region with increased uptake of carbondioxide. Methane releases were sustained as well.
This past week, I attended the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) meeting in Hangzhou, China. In previous posts, Ive explained what the IPCC is, why this assessment cycle is crucial , and highlighted its role in climate action. Approving expert meetings and passing the budget. Whats Next for the IPCC?
Climatechange is propelling these weather events to grow faster and stronger than ever before. Other climatechange impacts are accelerating as well. Consider the record-breaking warm ocean temperatures of the past year, which has caused the largest coral bleaching event on record , habitat loss and species migration.
It is also necessary to remove carbondioxide from the atmosphere (a process known as carbondioxide removal or CDR). Seaweed naturally converts dissolved carbondioxide in ocean water into organic carbon through photosynthesis. EPA may regulate seaweed sinking under the MPRSA.
Scientists have identified a number of land- and ocean-based carbondioxide removal (CDR) approaches. Early efforts primarily focused on land-based approaches, but interest in ocean-based approaches, also known as marine CDR, has grown in recent years. ocean waters. judge-made) law. Read the report here.
This past week, I attended the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) meeting in Hangzhou, China. In previous posts, Ive explained what the IPCC is, why this assessment cycle is crucial , and highlighted its role in climate action. Approving expert meetings and passing the budget. Whats Next for the IPCC?
Our planet is undergoing significant changes due to climate disruption, with especially severe impacts on the ocean. Most climate action today rightly focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately, these efforts are necessary, but not sufficient to meet global climate targets.
Sprinkling powered basalt over natural ecosystems would remove vast amounts of carbondioxide from the Earth’s atmosphere while also improving soils. But even in best case scenarios for renewable energy and industrial decarbonization, it looks certain that significant carbondioxide emissions will continue for decades.
Can the new advisory opinion interpreting the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) move us beyond the lethargy of unmet climatechange policy needs ? By accepting the COSIS request, ITLOS boldly advanced the international law of climatechange to take full account of its harmful impacts on the marine environment.
But with estimates suggesting that sea level rise will affect more than one billion people around the world in the next 25 years, this is one member of the dysfunctional climatechange family that shouldn’t be ignored. As the ocean warms, it expands. That adds water to the oceans, which raises their level. Why is this?
But what happens when we achieve the goal of zero carbondioxide emissions from human actions? Does the climate keep warming, stay the same, or even cool? It turns out this is a critical question for understanding what carbon budgets we have in terms of emissions, if we seek to meet temperature thresholds like 2 degrees Celsius.
Today, climatechange is the central, though by no means the only, concern in environmental law. I found only one relevant reference using the term “climatechange” before 1985. In one sentence of a 1975 article, John Barton referred to “climatechange” as a potentially severe long-term problem.
Even as world leaders convene in Azerbaijan for COP29 to chart a path forward to avoid a climate catastrophe, the fact is that the world has waited too long for emissions reduction alone to solve the climate crisis. Climatechange is here, and nowhere is this more immediately apparent than in our ocean.
I followed with great interest the launch of the sixth assessment report Working Group 1 (The Physical Science Basis) from the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) on August 9th. The cause of our changingclimate is the increase in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations that we have released into the air.
Running Tide, a carbon-removal company in the US, has sunk more than 10,000 tonnes of waste wood into the Atlantic Ocean in an effort to reduce carbondioxide levels in the atmosphere – but experts aren't convinced it will work
On May 21, 2024, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) delivered a long-awaited Advisory Opinion on climatechange and international law. This marks the first time that an international tribunal has issued an advisory opinion on State obligations regarding climatechange mitigation.
Lead author Adam Gold , a watershed researcher for the Environmental Defense Fund, said the wild uncertainty is because the court arbitrarily created a new standard for federal protection divorced from the science of how wetlands support larger streams, rivers, lakes and the ocean.
The ocean has absorbed nearly 33% of all greenhouse gas emissions and around 90% of the excess heat produced through climatechange. It may seem like a good thing all around that the ocean is protecting us in this way, but the ocean actually pays a hefty price. Thanks for signing up for Ocean Conservancy emails.
Some scientists say the controversial fishing practice of ocean trawling stirs up buried organic matter, some of which makes its way to the surface in the form of carbondioxide
They are also vulnerable to climatechange as their shells are sensitive to ocean acidification. They found that one is less vulnerable to changes in the Southern Ocean than the other. The world’s oceans absorb approximately a quarter of all carbondioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. The fact that L.
The Sabin Center published a new report today recommending actions that federal agencies could take to ensure safe and responsible permitting and regulation of oceancarbondioxide removal (CDR) research in U.S. A variety of ocean-based CDR approaches—i.e., Those activities could raise a host of legal issues. and the U.S.
The Sabin Center wrapped up Climate Week NYC last Friday with an event exploring the opportunities and challenges posed by ocean-based carbondioxide removal (CDR). As evidenced by the 150-plus people in attendance, ocean CDR is attracting growing attention as a possible climatechange mitigation option.
At the evening seafood reception that year, in a corner near the fresh oysters, a board member of the Maine Lobstermen’s Association remarked to me, “Everyone blames everything on climatechange, but they blame the Right Whale on lobstering.” His remark has remained with me ever since. Sea levels are rising.
A new report published today by the Sabin Center examines the laws governing international transport of carbondioxide for sequestration. We focus, specifically, on the shipping of carbondioxide that was captured in Europe to the United States for sequestration there.
As another year comes to a close, I am reflecting on the incredible progress Ocean Conservancy has made in 2023 towards a healthy, resilient ocean future. For better or worse, this is the nature of ocean conservation work—sometimes we hit roadblocks, but it’s a reminder of why this work is so critically important.
Our oceans are acidifying. A new report has warned that the level of acidity in the world’s oceans is higher now than it has been for the past 26,000 years. In a statement, WMO Secretary-General Petteri Taalas said “Our climate is changing before our eyes. ” How the oceans absorb carbon and store the heat.
The longevity of naturally occurring carbon sinks, like those in Earth’s forests, is a key part of all modeled and projected pathways to net-zero. Without the considerable carbon absorption capacity of our lands (and oceans), we’d currently have much more CO 2 in the atmosphere and an accelerated timeline of warming.
Spreading olivine on beaches could accelerate ocean uptake of carbondioxide and potentially limit climatechange. Read the full story at Eos. The concept and execution still face some scrutiny from scientists.
As deeply troubling reports continue to come in about ocean waters hitting historic hot temperatures, sectors like global shipping are trying to understand the consequences of a warmer ocean and what can be done to stop the heating. So, we’re seeing the ocean heat up, lose oxygen and get bigger. as a national policy leader.
Assessments by the IPCC have made clear that the most feasible way for the world to meet its target of restricting climatechange to below two degrees Celsius of warming includes rapid and massive expansion of carbon removal technology – technology that would extract carbondioxide and permanently sequester that carbondioxide underground.
Ten students had just listened to me explain the cascade of negative effects associated with the increasing acidification of ocean waters. The frightful phenomenon is on a scale proportional to and correlated with the climate altering changes in Earth’s atmosphere.
Human activity adds more than 50 gigatons of carbondioxide to the atmosphere each year. New Solid Carbon technology might be able to lock climate-warming carbondioxide below ocean bedrock. Photo credit: Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions. Large-scale solutions are urgently needed.
‘Despite decades of warnings, we are still heading in the wrong direction’ By Bob Berwyn Research released this week raises new questions about how much more Earth may warm, or cool, if and when human carbondioxide emissions zero out.
Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) is one of several proposed techniques for removing carbondioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in the oceans. OAE seeks to counteract ocean acidification, while also increasing carbon storage in the oceans. By Romany M. Webb and Korey Silverman-Roati.
Two reports published in the US look seriously at the practicalities and responsibilities of altering the ocean to tackle the climate crisis. It’s now widely acknowledged that to avoid catastrophic climatechange we’ll need to physically remove CO2 from the atmosphere. The ocean as a carbon sink.
The suit claims that BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Shell, and the American Petroleum Institute misled the public despite clear knowledge that their products cause climatechange. For more than 50 years , the fossil fuel industry has obstructed meaningful climate action. at UMass Amherst.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content