This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Fleets that utilize electric and hydrogen vehicles are eligible to earn Low Carbon Fuel Standard ( LCFS ) credits, which can be sold to offset ZEV costs. Under the federal CleanAirAct, California must obtain a waiver from EPA for certain air quality regulations that go beyond federal standards.
Critically, and as we’ll discuss in greater depth shortly, hydrogen combustion (as opposed to its use in fuel cells) also leads to greater emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), a toxic group of pollutants regulated under the CleanAirAct. All this is not to say there is no place for hydrogen in a clean energy future.
Berkeley’s so-called “natural gas ban” was the first local ordinance in the country to effectively require all-electric construction of new buildings. Local governments have structured or are considering structuring all-electric construction policies in a variety of ways, some of which remain untouched by the Ninth Circuit ruling.
The group of petitioners challenging the EPA rules imposing strict limits on carbondioxide emissions from existing power plants filed its opening briefs on Friday, February 19. The Clean Power Plan would affect every electricity user in the United States, from the largest manufacturing plant to the smallest home.
EPA, as well as state and municipal governments, use the information received from reporting entities to inform the development and implementation of rules and regulations prescribed by the CleanAirAct (CAA). Notably, and unlike the SEC and California rules, EPA’s GHGRP is not directed at investors or consumers.
Of Justice Indicts Erie Coke (Coal) And Corporate Officer For Violating Federal CleanAirAct Over 4 Years EPA To Host Dec. Of Justice Indicts Erie Coke (Coal) And Corporate Officer For Violating Federal CleanAirAct Over 4 Years EPA To Host Dec.
Shortly thereafter, the Supreme Court ruled that EPA had the authority to regulate carbondioxide emissions from passenger cars and trucks under Massachusetts v. EPA , and Congress finalized the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 , requiring increasing fuel economy standards.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had failed to fulfill its non-discretionary obligation under Section 321(a) of the CleanAirAct to conduct evaluations of loss or shifts in employment that might result from implementation of the CleanAirAct. Murray Energy Corp. McCarthy , No. 5:14 -cv-39 (N.D.
The proposal requires companies to report information related to “Scope 1” direct carbon emissions (think fuel use and greenhouse gases), “Scope 2” indirect carbon emissions (e.g., purchased energy and electricity), and for some companies to report on information related to “Scope 3” carbon emissions (i.e.,
Methane, the primary component of natural gas, is a potent greenhouse gas over 80 times more powerful than carbondioxide in the near-term. Recently, EPA issued a protective supplemental proposal under the federal CleanAirAct to reduce methane pollution from new and existing sources in the oil and gas sector.
The legislature put two provisions in the Appropriations Act of 2023 (House Bill 259) to prevent state agencies from adopting rules intended to reduce emissions of greenhouse gasses such as carbondioxide (CO2) in the state. Prohibit cap and trade programs for CO2 emissions. House Bill 259, Sec. million to $865.9
They are water vapor, carbondioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, CFCs, and hydrofluorocarbons. The CleanAirAct is an excellent example of this following the publication of Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring. 10 years later, the act was modified to include toxic pollutants and funded sewage.
Image via PickPik On May 23, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) proposed emission limits and guidelines for carbondioxide from fossil fuel-powered plants. To avoid the same fate as the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan, which was struck down by the conservative Supreme Court in West Virginia v.
The greenhouse gases are methane, water vapor, nitrous oxide and carbondioxide (12). Methane is a natural gas and one burnt as fuel in many parts of the world, but it too increases air density and the greenhouse effect. Sponsored Content. By nature, they are warmer and more humid than a garden.
Of Justice Indicts Erie Coke (Coal) And Corporate Officer For Violating Federal CleanAirAct Over 4 Years [PaEN] -- Erie Times: Erie Coke (Coal), Ex-Plant Chief Indicted On Charges Of Violating Federal CleanAirAct -- Pittsburgh's Group Against Smog & Pollution Hosts Dec.
EPAs 2024 Vehicle Standards EPA derives its authority and mandate to promulgate rules regulating mobile sources like light- and medium-duty vehicles from Section 202 of the CleanAirAct. In 2007, the Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v. However, the Vehicle Standards do not mandate the use of a particular vehicle technology.
greenhouse gas emissions, more than the electric power sector. EPA is an effort by conservative states and fuel suppliers to block EPA regulations of greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles under the CleanAirAct. I’m an appellate litigator with a focus on climate and CleanAirAct cases.
EPA as a decision depriving EPA of an important tool to address climate change under the CleanAirAct. First Court did not eliminate the Agency’s ability to require greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions reductions under section 111 or any other section of the CleanAirAct. Posted on July 5, 2022 by Robert B.
Supreme Court issued a decision striking down an Obama era rule regulating carbondioxide (CO2) emissions from existing power plants. EPA held the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan Rule exceeded EPA’s authority under the CleanAirAct. The Clean Power Plan Rule.
“Our stronger standards will work hand in hand with the historic level of resources from the Inflation Reduction Act to protect our most vulnerable communities and to put us on a path to achieve President Biden’s ambitious climate goals.” That’s nearly the same as all greenhouse gases emitted from coal-fired electricity generation in the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency calling on the agency to accelerate efforts to cut pollution in the nation’s electricity sector and establish robust carbon pollution standards for new and existing power plants. Cutting climate pollution from the power sector would be a linchpin for cleaning up pollution across all economic sectors.
The EPA is proposing a new standard for fossil fuel-fired power plants to avoid 617 million metric tons of carbondioxide through 2042. So, EPA and the states have a shared responsibility to regulate “existing sources” — primarily power plants— under Section 111(d) of the CleanAirAct. It’s What’s Required.
In the last sixty years, the amount of carbondioxide in the atmosphere has grown 100 times faster than it did at the close of the last ice age. The EPA has found the current (or any increasing) mix of atmospheric concentrations of six greenhouse gases, including carbondioxide, poses a threat to human health.
The court held that the City’s claims were not completely preempted by the CleanAirAct and also was not persuaded by the companies’ argument that the claims necessarily arose under federal common law. The companies argued that even if state law did apply, the CleanAirAct and foreign affairs doctrine would preempt the claims.
EPA , the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has regulated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from motor vehicles under the CleanAirAct. billion tons of carbondioxide emissions by 2050. These emissions standards were significantly loosened in the last year of the Trump Administration.
But in this blog post, I unpack an aspect of the decision where I think it was more of a mixed bag: the court’s treatment of the international air pollution provision of the CleanAirAct, Section 115. The headline here is that the Second Circuit found that Section 115 authorizes the U.S.
Circuit vacated both the Trump Administration’s decision to repeal the 2015 Clean Power Plan, which established guidelines for states to limit carbondioxide emissions from power plants, and the Affordable Clean Energy Rule that the Trump administration issued in its place.
First, the court said the cities’ novel theories of liability based on the defendants’ sales of their product did not differentiate their claims from earlier transboundary pollution suits in which the Supreme Court ( American Electric Power Co. Connecticut ) and Ninth Circuit ( Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp.
In other words, if a regulation mentions electric vehicles, its probably on the target list. The executive order also attacks clean vehicle incentives and federal support for electric vehicle charging stations, important complementary policies helping families around the nation make the switch to cleaner vehicles. In the U.S.,
Here is the Court’s reasoning in a nutshell: Capping carbondioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible “solution to the crisis of the day.” New York v. United States, 505 U. 144, 187 (1992). What did the Court strike down?
The rule, which also applies to new gas plants, would avoid as much as 617 million metric tons of carbondioxide through 2042, the EPA calculated , the equivalent of the annual emissions of 137 million passenger vehicles—about half of the cars in the country. percent of US electricity and utility-scale solar generated 3.4
States, Electricity Providers Allowed to Intervene in Case Concerning Management of Glen Canyon Dam. Individuals, companies, and organizations filed 18 amicus briefs in support of the Public Health and Environmental Petitioners, State and Municipal Petitioners, Clean Energy Associations, and Power Company Petitioners. 2:19-cv-120 (N.D.
At least partly—if not largely—because the AGs and their political organization, the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA), receive substantial financial support from fossil fuel companies, electric utilities, and their respective trade groups. Electric utilities, meanwhile, gave her $44,750.
Ahead of COP, ESA issued a statement calling on world leaders attending the United Nations Climate Change Conference of Parties (COP26) in Glasgow to pledge immediate action to reduce carbondioxide (CO 2 ) and other greenhouse gas emissions that limits rising temperatures to 1.5? Comments must be received on or before Nov.
EPA’s 2024 Power Plant Rules EPA is required to regulate power plant emissions under Section 111 of the CleanAirAct. EPA that carbondioxide and other greenhouse gases fall within the CleanAirAct’s capacious definition of “air pollutant.” Connecticut , 564 U.S. 410, 426 (2011)).
The CleanAirAct provision at issue authorizes small refineries to petition EPA “for an extension of the exemption … for the reason of disproportionate economic hardship.” In re Hawaiian Electric Co. , The ACE Rule replaced the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan. SCOT-20-0000309 (Haw. June 29, 2021).
The final rule also adopted an interpretation of CleanAirAct Section 111 that required, as a predicate to establishing NSPS, a determination by EPA that a pollutant causes or contributes significantly to dangerous air pollution. Missouri v. Biden , No. 4:21-cv-00287 (E.D.
The first petition was filed by West Virginia and 18 other states that had intervened to defend the repeal and replacement rule, known as the Affordable Clean Energy rule. The states asserted counts under the Administrative Procedure Act and of ultra vires action. 66,496 (Dec. 15,2 2009).
However, the world could avoid the more extreme scenarios in the report if governments sharply reduce carbondioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions. billion for electric grid resilience and infrastructure improvements, $7.5 It’s seen as a way to quickly increase clean energy use without hiking electric bills for consumers.
In the meantime, the Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases issued a technical document providing interim estimates, including a cost of $51 per metric ton of carbondioxide, using estimates developed prior to 2017 and adjusting for inflation.
as a pollutant at all to the Clean Power Plan, which has no chance of clemency before its swift execution at some point in 2017. [14]. Additionally, under attack is the carbon pollution standard rule. “If Carbondioxide (CO. is the inescapable byproduct of carbon energy use. Furthermore, the CEI notes in its.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content