This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
To adjust the focus of this picture a little closer, just our passenger cars and light trucks contribute to a whopping 58 percent of total transportation emissions, placing our car-centric society in the fossilfuel spotlight. Petroleum has accounted for more than 90 percent of transportation energy in the last 50 years.
It’s not just the poor air quality, long lines, and excessive fossilfuel company representation ; nations are still too far apart in their positions on a fossilfuel phaseout, the top priority for this COP. Yet global fossilfuel production and use continue to expand. Particulate matter (PM2.5)
And fossilfuel power plants may not stick to their retirement schedules for a variety of reasons. In 2021 alone, the plants slated for retirement emitted more than 28,000 tonnes of nitrogenoxides (NO x ), 32,000 tonnes of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), and 51 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), according to EIA data.
So of course the American Lung Association ’s yearly report, State of the Air (SOTA), published every year since 2000, is of professional and personal interest. The air quality for this report was calculated using data reviewed by EPA from 2020, 2021, and 2022. These particles are categorized by size.
And we’re still trying to recover from a pandemic that has made even more clear the disproportionate impacts of airpollution on overburdened communities, making them even more vulnerable to the negative impacts of COVID 19. Similarly, communities now tied to fossilfuels need support in moving beyond that dependence.
Union of Concerned Scientists’ (UCS) research shows that top fossilfuel producers’ emissions are responsible for as much as half of global surface temperature increase. The best solution: Replace fossilfuels with renewable energy. A small number of big corporations are responsible for the climate crisis.
Communities and ecosystems continue to suffer the consequences of human-caused climate change , primarily from the burning of fossilfuels across our economy. The case for phasing out of fossilfuels and making a just and equitable transition to clean energy has never been more clear. comes from burning fossilfuels.
Research shows that halting the burning of fossilfuels in homes and businesses is beneficial for the health of residents and vital to combat climate change. The Threats of Gas Appliances Every day, domestic gas-powered building appliances emit 65 tons of toxic and highly reactive gases called nitrogenoxides (NOx) per day.
The shift from fossilfuels in the 100-percent RES scenario reduces the amount of toxic power plant airpollution much more than what we called a “no-new-policy,” or business-as-usual, scenario. Under the no-new-policy scenario, sulfur dioxide and nitrogenoxides decline only by 27 percent and 18 percent, respectively.
It also will save US consumers money because they will spend less on fossilfuels. First, decarbonizing the electricity sector mainly with wind and solar to replace coal and fossil gas. Second, replacing fossilfuels with clean electricity in the transportation, building, and industrial sectors. Your thoughts?
First, there’s airpollution. Gas plants and infrastructure emit nitrogenoxides (NOx) during combustion, which degrade local air quality. Exposure to NOx and other gas infrastructure airpollutants has been associated with respiratory illnesses and an increase in childhood asthma rates.
More recently, ongoing discrimination continues to push marginalized groups into areas with existing polluting infrastructure. In New England, the percent of people of color living near fossilfuel power plants is up to 23.5 Most notable of these polluting emissions are nitrogenoxides (NOx).
Switching from fossilfuels like gasoline to increasingly clean electricity sources is vital for hitting climate and airpollution goals. Eliminating gasoline combustion also means getting rid of harmful pollutant emissions like nitrogenoxides and reactive organic gases.
In late April, California air regulators are poised to pass one of the most meaningful regulations to reduce pollution from commercial trucks, vans, and buses. The Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) rule, which I’ve blogged about in detail before, will phase out fossil-fueled trucks over the next several decades.
We need more electricity to transition our homes and cars off fossilfuels, but we can’t afford to let that electricity come from more gas power plants. Because unlike moving sources of airpollution like cars, gas plants are completely stationary. Why is this inequitable and disproportionate siting a problem?
California’s leadership on reducing truck pollution has been on full display the past few years, passing critical regulations requiring 90 percent reduction in smog-forming nitrogenoxide (NO X ) emissions from diesel trucks and requiring manufacturers sell an increasing share of electric trucks to move away from fossilfuels altogether.
This included a bill that would have started a statewide conversation about the diminished role fossilfuels should play in Maine’s energy system as the state strives to meet its climate and clean energy commitments. Gas is primarily composed of methane—a fossilfuel with extremely high global warming potential.
In the coming years, Californians will begin to see a massive switch away from highly pollutingfossil-fueled trucks to zero-emission electric trucks. Additionally, the rule phases out the sale of fossil-fueled trucks in 2036. The rule will apply to commercial, federal, state, municipal, and drayage fleets.
Respected bodies like the International Energy Agency have been clear – there is no room for new fossilfuel infrastructure if we want to hold warming to 1.5 Along with their contribution to larger climate change impacts, gas plants also cause local airpollution – mainly nitrogenoxides and particulate matter.
Most household appliances, like furnaces and water heaters, are powered by fossilfuels and emit nitrogenoxides (NOx) —toxic and highly reactive gases that endanger human health and the environment. Zero-NOx appliance standards would benefit public health, cut greenhouse gas pollution, and create jobs.
Fossil gas, or “natural gas,” as it’s been cunningly branded, is a fossilfuel that causes warming and is harmful to human health. Its mainstream name is nothing more than a clever marketing scheme by Big Oil to make the fuel sound natural, safe, and clean. This is a huge problem. Many reasons!
By Joseph Minott, Clean Air Council This guest essay first appeared in the Beaver County Times on March 19, 2023 -- If the first three months of operations at Shell’s petrochemical plant are any indication, the next 30 years are going to be stressful and hazardous for nearby Beaver Country residents. tons in any consecutive 12-month period).
One is a subsidy to Enbridge—a fossilfuel giant—to build a fossilfuel power plant. Instead, it will lock in pollutingfossilfuel infrastructure for decades. Instead, this false solution will foist more waste and airpollution on a community that is already overburdened with both.
This investment will enable us to begin transitioning our fleet from burning fossilfuels to using renewable resources to reduce our carbon footprint, which will benefit both our company and our community.” It also helps lower the level of carbon dioxide, one of the greenhouse gases heating up the climate, in the air.
Despite the generous funding opportunities and holistic flexibilities baked into ACF, confusion around and misinformation about the rule may undermine this much-needed shift away from fossil-fueled trucks and buses. The ACF is estimated to significantly reduce pollution from the statewide commercial truck and bus fleet.
A team of transportation and policy experts from the University of California released a report today to the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) outlining policy options to significantly reduce transportation-related fossilfuel demand and emissions. The state funded the two studies through the 2019 Budget Act.
While some who drive past these refineries don’t have to live near them or work in them, those who do can be harmed by the well-documented effects of refinery pollution on human health. The fossilfuel industry has systematically contaminated our environment with a wide range of toxic chemicals for over a century.
But while greenhouse gas emissions may be reduced, a delivery fulfilled by a diesel-burning truck may lead to increases in emissions of smog-forming nitrogenoxides and lung-damaging particulate matter.
pollution from vehicles. Among this fleet of trucks and buses, tractor trucks are, by far, the most significant polluters – although just about 1 in 10 medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, they’re responsible for around half of all emissions from the state’s fleet. There are more than 1.8 The rule would also reduce NOx and PM2.5
The UN’s Climate Change Conference is just about to kick off in Dubai, juxtaposing the powerful political power of the fossilfuel industry and the desperate need to reduce oil and gas usage as we face an ongoing climate crisis.
Coal also emits other airpollution factors such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogenoxides and particulate matter… All this causes smog and soot which in turn cause asthma, cancers of all sorts, cardiovascular diseases… Which brings us to its health effects: coal is a mass murderer and is responsible for immense suffering.
And Ontario is, well… Ontario really really likes so-called “natural” gas – a fossilfuel – and plans to use more of it to generate electricity. 600 per cent more by 2040 – which is going to add a lot more climate pollution to the atmosphere! Sweden is aiming to eliminate fossilfuels from it’s electricity sector by 2040.
Fossil-fueled trucks, vans, and buses are a major source of climate-disrupting greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogenoxides (NOx), particulate matter (PM), and hazardous airpollutants that harm public health.
The elimination of coal-fired power plants and increased use of natural gas in power generation has led to historic emissions and airpollutant reductions equaling $450 billion to $1.04 Environmental Protection Agency methodologies to assign a dollar value to each ton of nitrogenoxide and sulfur dioxide reduced.
Unfortunately, once nitrous oxide is released into the air, it sticks around for more than 100 years before beginning to break down, heating the atmosphere and depleting the ozone layer. But Big Ag pollutes more than water. And that pollution has compounding consequences.
Certainly, gas stoves are just one source of airpollution in the District. As we now know, fossilfuel companies lied about it for decades to protect their profits. That would of course include fossil gas, which consists of 85 to 90 percent methane, a significantly more potent heat-trapping gas than carbon dioxide.
This fine particulate often comprises a toxic brew of carbon, sulfur dioxide and nitrogenoxide created by several sources, including combustion in fossilfuel power plants, factories, and from car and truck emissions. The soot particles in question are known as PM 2.5 for particulate matter that is 2.5 results in 2.2
[PaEN] -- New Penn State Extension Master Gardeners Podcast Features Pollinator Habitat Certification Program [PaEN] -- Hawk Mountain Sanctuary: Register Now For 2024 Summer Student Nature Camps -- DCNR Daily Forecast Wildfire Danger Map Public Participation -- PA Oil & Gas Industrial Facilities: Permit Notices, Opportunities To Comment - April (..)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content