This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
CleanAirAct. In public health terms, what makes airpollution distinctive is the millions of people exposes to common pollutants such as particulates and smog. CleanWaterAct. This law has done a good job at cleaning up municipal and industrial waterpollution.
To explore a small piece of what is at stake, let’s take a quick look at some of the rules currently under review at the EPA: Air emission reporting requirements If finalized and implemented, this rule will improve the way airpollution emissions are estimated and collected by the EPA.
However, since major US environmental laws are enacted to protect the air, water, and land separately (i.e. the CleanAirAct, the CleanWaterAct, the Safe Drinking WaterAct), as a result, EPA programs are often implemented narrowly, not holistically.
There are Supreme Court cases going back a century or more dealing with what we would now consider environmental issues such as preserving nature or airpollution. I began with a Westlaw search for the term “airpollution.” The earliest opinion I found was Huron Portland Cement Co. City of Detroit. Download as PDF.
Farber focuses on US Supreme Court decisions, finding its earliest uses of "airpollution" and "waterpollution" and references to wilderness as something worthy of preservation in decisions from the 1960s. Wolfe, Los Angeles County AirPollution Control District vehicle, Burbank, 1947-1950?
The bill further requires EPA to list PFOA and PFOS as hazardous airpollutants (HAPs) under the CleanAirAct and establish pretreatment standards and effluent limits for the compounds under the CleanWaterAct.
Take for instance: the burning Cuyahoga River that led to the CleanWaterAct; the disastrous airpollution incident in Donora, PA that led to the passage of the CleanAirAct; the discovery of Love Canal that lead to the passage of Superfund; and most tragically, the chemical gas release in Bhopal, India that lead to the passage of EPCRA.
Toxic Substances Control Act section 7 imminently hazardous chemical. Supreme Court regarding the CleanAirAct and other environmental statutes as to whether EPA is required to consider costs when promulgating a rule. There have been multiple cases that have gone up to the U.S.
For example, EPA under the CleanWaterAct established 129 “ Priority Pollutants ” in 1976, a list of which is a typical analytical suite that you can order as a package. CleanWaterAct. Through this law, waterpollution is managed by controlling wastewater discharges.
Beverly Wright, Vernice Miller-Travis , and Peggy Shepard, among others, shows that Black and brown communities are disproportionately exposed to and harmed by pollution. A myriad of studies since have validated these findings across a number of exposures, such as soot airpollution (PM2.5
Indoor air (pollution) : coming under OSHA rather than EPA, there are laws in place to ensure that employees work in a clean and safe environment with good ventilation. Indoor air is anything contained with a building. It prohibits the discharge of polluting chemicals into US waters unless a special permit is granted.
Farber writes: Well over a century ago, the Supreme Court ruled that it had that power to remedy interstate waterpollution. Six years later, the Court decided its first airpollution case. Yet the Court didn’t hesitate to address pollution issues. an interstate airpollution case. That was in 1901.
In 2012, the company became infamous again when it unsuccessfully sued Ben-Jei Tsuang, a professor at the Department of Environmental Engineering in National Chun Hsing University, who published a paper linking high cancer rates in Mailiao, Taiwan, to toxic dioxin and heavy metals airpollution from the Six Naphtha Cracking plant.
The Cuyahoga fire, along with a major oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara that same year, galvanized national attention and led to the first Earth Day, a slew of new air and water protection laws, and the creation of new federal departments to administer them, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Methane Emissions EPA announced it would reconsider regulations for the oil and gas industry under Section 111 of the CleanAirAct and Subpart W of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. EPA also announced it would reconsider risk management rules that cover oil and natural gas refineries and chemical facilities.
This framework allows state environmental laws passed pursuant to a federal environmental law, like the CleanWaterAct (“CWA”) or CleanAirAct (“CAA”), to have the force and effect of federal law if the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) approves the state implementation plans.
Outside of bird protection acts of the early 20 th century, protections for water, air and the atmosphere are a late 20 th -century development, created in the wake of Rachel Carson’s 1962 treatise on pesticides, Silent Spring. Justice Alito has displayed similar cynicism about water protection.
But in this blog post, I unpack an aspect of the decision where I think it was more of a mixed bag: the court’s treatment of the international airpollution provision of the CleanAirAct, Section 115. In my view, the court missed the mark, in the main. The book and related materials can be accessed here.).
EPA Sought Information to Inform Regulation of 1-Bromopropane as Hazardous AirPollutant. The bill also would establish a grant program under the Safe Drinking WaterAct for assistance to community water systems affected by PFAS to pay for capital costs associated with treatment technologies. The House bill ( H.R.
The plaintiffs’ complaint asserting National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), CleanWaterAct, and Rivers and Harbors Act violations included allegations that the U.S. ExxonMobil Corp. applied federal common law. The planned pipeline is to be 162.5 miles long and is intended to carry crude oil.
The Washington Supreme Court concluded that the Washington CleanAirAct did not grant the Department of Ecology authority to regulate indirect greenhouse gas emissions of businesses and utilities whose products ultimately generate such emissions. Trump , No. 4:19-cv-00028 (D.
Circuit’s January opinion vacating EPA’s repeal and replacement of the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan regulations for controlling carbon emissions from existing power plants. The conservation groups asserted claims under NEPA, the CleanWaterAct, and Endangered Species Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.
The bill would amend Section 4 of TSCA to require EPA to issue a testing rule for all PFAS that would require manufacturers and processors of PFAS to develop information “likely to be useful in evaluating the hazard and risk posed by such substances in land, air, and water (including drinking water), as well as in products.
The final rule also adopted an interpretation of CleanAirAct Section 111 that required, as a predicate to establishing NSPS, a determination by EPA that a pollutant causes or contributes significantly to dangerous airpollution.
as a pollutant at all to the Clean Power Plan, which has no chance of clemency before its swift execution at some point in 2017. [14]. Additionally, under attack is the carbon pollution standard rule. “If However, the Clean Power Plan is currently tied up in the D.C. Pro-Growth Agenda for the 114th Congress.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content