This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Earlier this year, The Guardian ran a powerful article exposing the ties of Elsevier, one of the world’s largest academic publishing companies, to the fossilfuel industry. The article caught my attention because I’d never considered the ways in which an academic publisher might be perpetuating and enabling a fossilfuel economy.
In a new study released today, UCS attributes substantial temperature and sea level rise to emissions traced to the largest fossilfuel producers and cement manufacturers. Every delay in phasing out fossilfuels will burden future generations who need to adapt to rising seas and recover from loss and damage due to sea level impacts.
Current national climate pledges fall well-short of the Paris Agreement goal to keep global average temperature increase this century well below 2°C and to pursue efforts to limit temperature increase to 1.5°C The UN’s 2021 Emissions Gap Report finds that under current pledges temperatures will still rise by 2.7°C To hit the 1.5°C
According to the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange report published Monday, Southeast Asia coastal zones are among the world’s most climate vulnerable regions. By Laura Gersony, Circle of Blue — August 10, 2021. Graphic courtesy of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange.
According to the Energy Information Agency , South Korea’s power sector is heavily reliant on fossilfuels. Two thirds of generation capacity is based on fossilfuels, split evenly between coal and natural gas, with 17% nuclear, and 14% hydro and other renewables. 50% coal, 26% gas, and 25% nuclear. Download as PDF.
I feel like climatechange is going to have to get worse before it gets better. Climatechange has been a big, scary, looming problem for basically the entirety of my life; I cannot remember a time when it was not at least a background concern. This holiday season, I’m especially grateful for their tone of determination.
They are especially squawking about investments that take into account the climate crisis, despite the fact that extreme weather events are wreaking havoc across the country. At last half of the bills are based on a template provided by the fossilfuel industry-funded American Legislative Exchange Council.
For almost two year now the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is under revision and negotiations shall finish in 2021. The aim of the EU is to try to stop fossilfuel companies suing states over climate action. Then a further round is already planned for February or March 2021.
The IPCC compiles scientific insights on climatechange, informing policymakers and the public about risks and possible actions. In essence, combined with climate models, they provide a way to envision the consequences of different actions or inactions. What Are Future Climate Scenarios?
In light of Native American Heritage Day last Friday, we should also be thinking about the future of the tribes in the era of climatechange. Tribes face serious challenges from climatechange, but also some potential opportunities. In terms of climate impacts, many tribes are at high risk. Download as PDF.
As Gernot Wagner puts it in ‘ Geoengineering: the Gamble ’: “The decision is all about risk-risk tradeoffs” He urges us to put the risks of potentially pursuing solar geoengineering against “the risks of unmitigated climatechange.” The National Academy of Sciences adopted a ’risk-risk’ framing in its 2021 report.
The image that comes to mind when I think of fossilfuel villains is Batman’s adversary Two-Face. To be two-faced is to be deceitful, and deception is what the fossilfuel industry executives excel in. What is ESG? ” Kentucky officials are not doing this alone, it is part of a coordinated effort.
This week, Circle of Blue looks at a major new climate report, which finds that a warming planet is accelerating the water cycle. The Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange, a group of the world’s leading climate scientists, has released its sixth assessment report. The report, while grim, does offer hope.
The outcomes of the latest international climate negotiations at COP28 in Dubai in December, while taking some important steps forward, fell far short of what is needed to avert climate catastrophe. One big positive from COP28 was the creation of a Loss and Damage fund to address climate impacts in the Global South.
In 2021, 9 percent of US electricity came from those graceful kinetic sculptures, up from less than 3 percent in 2011. Wind power generation will continue to rise, including in the near term as a result of one of the US wind industry’s best years ever in 2021. Eight states generate more than 25 percent of their electricity from wind.
Both extreme heat and wildfires are directly linked to climatechange. For years, fossilfuel companies have socialized the costs of their pollution while privatizing the benefits. Perhaps less obvious is the importance of state and local governments in holding the fossilfuel industry accountable.
Don’t forget to add on top of that the cost of climatechange. From increasing costs of insurance and everyday items like coffee and chocolate, to major expenses when dealing with climate crisis infrastructure damage, like damaged roads, bridges and buildings, we know climatechange is expensive.
That would be the straw man erected by defenders of the fossilfuel industry who claim that facing climatechange is a doctrinaire liberal policy. One group that has filed resolutions in the past is the far-right National Center for Public Policy Research, which fossilfuel companies including ExxonMobil have funded.
Here’s a taste: Wind power , the largest single source of renewable electricity in the country, grew the most of any renewable energy source in overall generation from 2021 to 2022. One reason is climatechange, and the increasingly dire news on that front. They offer a lot of good news about clean energy progress.
This changing landscape of sustainable finance in Canada marks a moment for the potential leader of the Liberal Party of Canada to champion a climate-aligned financial system that addresses the shortcomings of these crumbling global initiatives. The post The Great Bank Exodus: whats the story?
Having gained its status as an autonomous region, the fledgling Bangsamoro government has invited investors to drill under the Liguasan Marsh for fossilfuels. By Laura Gersony, Circle of Blue — November 1, 2021. Local representatives estimate that the fossilfuels underneath the marsh are valued at as much as $1 trillion. .
An assessment would have given decision-makers and the public a chance to better understand how this project would impact the climate, environment, and Indigenous rights before the government had to make a final decision on whether or not it could go ahead. In September 2021, Minister Wilkinson re-designated the project.
Minnesotans are facing concurrent crises of climatechange, high energy prices and inflation, and the inequitable public health impacts of fossilfuel air pollution. Getting energy from where it’s produced to where it’s needed. Unlocking the gridlock for Minnesota’s renewable energy future.
Drawing on research by the Union of Concerned Scientists and others, the commission report found that fossilfuel companies fully understood their products’ impact on climate as early as 1965, when their own scientists discovered them. N ovel Approaches to Climate Litigation. The Importance of Climate Litigation.
Two-thirds of the G20’s public finance for energy went to fossilfuels in 2019–2020. Subsidies reached new highs in 2021, even before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a Climate Transparency analysis finds. In total, 63% of the G20’s public finance for energy went to fossilfuels in 2019–2020.
These projections show that without additional policies or incentives, the US is very much in danger of not meeting our climate goals. We’re risking more impacts from climatechange due to continued reliance on natural gas and oil. This is where the analysis behind AEO2022 dates itself to November 2021.
Supran and his colleagues compellingly summarize the research, concluding: “All told, ExxonMobil was aware of contemporary climate science, contributed to that science, and predicted future global warming correctly.” Such a constraint would clearly place a limit on the amount of fossilfuels ExxonMobil could extract, produce and market.
That lower-than-expected electricity demand also makes spring (and the other “shoulder” season, fall) the go-to seasons for fossilfuel and nuclear power plants to go offline for scheduled maintenance—or refueling, in the case of the nuclear plants. That means that any renewable energy generation will supply a larger portion of demand.
The ExxonMobil lobbying report evaluated 56 trade associations—the 5% of its memberships the company estimates are active on climate policy—on their climate positions. And a look at the groups ExxonMobil remains allied with suggests IPAA may just be an embarrassing outlier.
Their efforts have paid off: The 27 resolutions demanding increased disclosure that went to a vote in 2021 averaged approximately 40 percent support, according to investment management firm Boston Trust Walden. ExxonMobil also funded the Consumer Energy Alliance , a pro-fracking front group run by PR firms on behalf of fossilfuel companies.
Thats why Prime Minister Trudeaus 2021 promise to deliver a net-zero electricity grid by 2035 was important. Yet, reaching net zero also means phasing out polluting fossilfuel energy, so the government developed rules to impose a pollution limit on electricity producers.
However, as we replace fossilfuels with clean electricity for heating and transportation to meet our climate goals, these peak demands will increasingly shift to the winter in many parts of the country. And this problem will only get worse as the impacts of climatechange become more frequent and severe.
Local actors seek climatechange damages from the biggest fossilfuel companies through state law litigation. EPA and the Supreme Court’s deregulatory trend, state action remains an avenue for climatechange adaptation and mitigation. In the wake of West Virginia v.
Avery was added to the board—a majority of shareholders for the first time approved a climate-related shareholder proposal. The corporation faced an unprecedented shareholder rebellion in 2021, with upstart hedge fund investor Engine No. The company used Dr. Avery’s image in promoting its bogus net-zero solutions.
If honored, this commitment will likely unseat Canada as the worst-ranking in the G20 for international public financing to the fossilfuel sector. . This means while EDC’s overall fossilfuel support was CAD 13.6 Shifting public finance for energy out of all fossilfuels and into clean energy is an urgent task.
Four important global reports released in the last two days set up a deeply sobering context for the upcoming annual international climate talks in Egypt, also called COP27. Source: UN ClimateChange 2022 NDC Synthesis Report. Source: UN ClimateChange 2022 NDC Synthesis Report. The UN NDC Synthesis report.
They’re also hoping to circumnavigate efforts to hold them accountable for their contribution to climatechange. The key word here is “ intensity :” Fossilfuel companies often focus on emissions intensity, meaning emissions per barrel of oil, rather than absolute emissions, which is a set number measured in metric tons.
The bad news is that we’re not yet on track to avoid dangerous climatechange. climate policy. Climate policy has been boosted by dramatic changes in the economics of clean energy. Wind power costs fell by half from 2008 to 2021. Neither should we wallow in despair. There’s a good basis for hope.
These bills move Oregon to the forefront of climate action. These laws ban new fossilfuel plants and set aggressive targets for the state’s two major utilities, requiring emission cuts of 80% by 2030, 90% by 2035 and 100% by 2040. On Wednesday, Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed a package of four clean energy bills. It is here.
That also means they play the largest role in climate-related environmental changes. For example, researchers at the Union of Concerned Scientists have directly linked fossilfuel producers’ Scope 1 and Scope 3 emissions to increases in ocean acidification , global temperature, sea level rise and North American wildfires.
Climatechange creates the right conditions for wildfires to spread easily, but it doesn’t start fires on its own With drier and warmer conditions, Canada’s forests become like a tinderbox that can cause a normal fire to get out of control. It’s happening because of unchecked climatechange.
The science is clear: Limiting the adverse effects of climatechange requires rapid reductions in emissions now. Minnesotans are already experiencing the climate crisis, as well as health impacts, from burning fossilfuels. The more of that we do, the more economic and health benefits the state will see.
What are the physical limitations of this fossilfuel resource that make it vulnerable during, say, summer droughts , or the types of extreme heat waves the world has been experiencing for months now? But what does extreme weather actually do to cause gas plants to run into trouble? energy system.
Japan ) and a second in Yokosuka in 2019 ( Yokosuka Climate Case ). In the 2019 case, the judgments focused on the procedural aspect of the replacement of the coal-fired power plant and discussion of the climate issues was limited. Background Japan has heavily relied on the use of fossilfuels for its power generation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content