Remove 2019 Remove Politics Remove Precautionary Principle
article thumbnail

Guest commentary: A ground-breaking judgment in Germany

Law Columbia

is politically insufficiently ambitious, but such a choice remains within the significant discretion of the legislature (¶¶159-162). See Brian Preston’s brilliant analysis, The End of Enlightened Environmental Law, Journal of Environmental Law 2019, 31, 399-411. A swift political reaction. However, adopting a 1.5C

2030 46
article thumbnail

Guest Commentary: An Unexpected Success for Czech Climate Litigation

Law Columbia

R ), which was created in 2019 to bring this case. ministries in this case) and not the general public, is a result of governmental political decision, not an exercise of public administration. The plaintiffs include multiple entities led by The Czech Climate Litigation Association ( Klimatická žaloba ?R

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

October 2019 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

Law Columbia

On October 1, 2019, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied fossil fuel companies’ motion for a stay pending their appeal of the district court order remanding Baltimore’s climate change lawsuit against the companies to state court. Pursuant to a consent order, the remand order will not be entered until October 10, 2019.

2019 40
article thumbnail

Nuclear Plant Closures And Renewables Increase Electricity Prices & Unreliability, Testifies Michael Shellenberger to U.S. Senate

Environmental Progress

21] In 2019, German electricity prices were 45 percent higher than the European average. [22] 22] A study published in late 2019 found that Germany’s nuclear phase-out is costing its citizens $12 billion per year. [23] 25] And that amount does not include the costs associated with local and state political opposition.

article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

Law Columbia

The majority said it “reluctantly” concluded that “the plaintiffs’ case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large” and “[t]hat the other branches may have abdicated their responsibility to remediate the problem does not confer on Article III courts, no matter how well-intentioned, the ability to step into their shoes.”

2020 40