This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The first climate case in Japan was filed in Sendai in 2017 ( Sendai Citizens v. Background Japan has heavily relied on the use of fossilfuels for its power generation. According to the Japanese Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, the countrys fossilfuel dependency was 83.2% Sendai Power Station ).
There is still much we can do to bend that emissions curve sharply within this decade—but only if world leaders, especially leaders of richer countries and major emitting nations, take responsibility to act together quickly and fossilfuel companies are held accountable for their decades of obstruction and deception.
This is a pretty clear illustration of how sea level starts to rise slowly; but in the long run, sea-level rise caused by fossil-fuel burning and deforestation in our generation could literally go off the chart and inundate many coastal cities and wipe entire island nations off the map. But first things first. meters of rise by 2100.
Barclays and HSBC are two of the major banks which continue to fund fossilfuel investments. A report by ShareAction has delivered a damning verdict on European banks connection to fossilfuel investments. Major European banks at the heart of continued fossilfuel support. Photo credit: AFP / Getty Images.
above pre-industrial levels, the high ambition goal set by the ParisAgreement. “As Only 44 of the 1,030 companies on the list have announced a coal exit date, and only around 30 of them have declared dates that could be considered aligned with the ParisAgreement. Gas power should not be an option.
Last year, climate negotiators in Glasgow finalized the ParisAgreement rulebook for international cooperation through carbon markets, clearing the way for the expansion of emissions trading and carbon pricing worldwide. – Do no harm.
Japan’s dependency on fossilfuel s had been slightly declining until 2010. But the country changed course as a result of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami, which led to the forced shutdown of nuclear power plants and greater reliance on fossilfuels. In September 2017, in Sendai Citizens v. Civil law cases.
Cuba’s power system is currently heavily reliant on fossilfuels. In 2022, fossilfuels accounted for about 95% of electricity generation, and about 48% of the fossilfuels used were imported, putting the country at high risk of price shocks and supply shortages.
This official inner circle is now doing the business of the three separate international treaties in force for climate change: the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC), the 1992 Kyoto Protocol (Yes, it still exists and is in force, although the United States is not a party), and the 2015 ParisAgreement.
They apparently have not realised that both the UN climate panel and the professional communities in the USA and Europe have written a number of reports to do exactly that ( IPCC AR6 2021 , NCA 2017 , ESOTC2022 ). It’s urgent to fix our climate problem In August, the global mean temperature was close to 1.5°C
Six environmental groups launched the proceeding challenging the stay after EPA published notice of the stay in the June 5, 2017 issue of the Federal Register. filed June 5, 2017; emergency motion for stay granted July 3, 2017). June 29, 2017). June 28, 2017). June 28, 2017). filed June 9, 2017).
Pakistan’s energy sector is dominated by fossilfuels. According to the country’s Finance Division , as of April 2022, just under 60% of total installed generation capacity used fossilfuels, including gas, oil and coal. This project was approved in 2017, long before the Chinese president’s proclamation.”
Reduce Ontario’s GHG emissions by at least 50 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, targets consistent with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the most ambitious aspects of the ParisAgreement. Bring emissions from electricity to 2017 levels, and achieving zero emissions by 2030.
Fourth Circuit Declined to Stay Remand Order in Baltimore’s Climate Case Against FossilFuel Companies; Companies Sought Stay from Supreme Court. All five have signed the ParisAgreement but, according to petitioners, none have made or kept commitments that align with keeping temperature rise under 2 degrees Celsius.
According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) , up to the end of 2017 the average amount awarded to foreign investors was US$504 million, with an increase in extremely high value cases (such as the over $4 billion award in Tethyan Copper v. Pakistan in 2019). Pakistan in 2019).
At this year’s annual general meetings, major investor-owned fossilfuel corporations are facing fewer climate-related shareholder proposals than at any time since the adoption of the Paris climate agreement in 2015. Such doublespeak is the latest evolution in the fossilfuel industry’s deception playbook.
First, he promised to re-join the ParisAgreement on `the first day in office´, second, he wants to embark on an ambitious phase-out programme for fossilfuels and third he promised to re-join the Iran Nuclear Deal. The earliest possible departure for the US from the ParisAgreement would, accordingly, be 4 November 2020.
The challenge originates with the Obama Administration’s 2015 Clean Power Plan , which required states to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants by 32 percent (below 2005 levels) by 2030, in line with the national commitment under the ParisAgreement. The Clean Power Plan never went into effect.
At least 20 cities, counties and states have filed lawsuits against ExxonMobil and other major fossilfuel companies for climate damages. They are also suing fossilfuel companies for consumer and investor fraud. EN: Recent reports have found that the world is on track to surpass the ParisAgreement’s 1.5
The plaintiffs alleged that Peabody (and a number of other fossilfuel companies) caused greenhouse gas emissions that resulted in sea level rise and damage to their property. Peabody, a coal company, filed for bankruptcy in April 2016 and emerged from bankruptcy under a plan that became effective on April 3, 2017. Seggos , No.
The federal district court for the Northern District of California denied Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change public nuisance lawsuits against five major fossilfuel producers to state court. 2017 CA 006685 B (D.C. The two states said the circumstances providing a basis for the stay (i.e.,
In Baltimore’s Climate Case Against FossilFuel Companies, Supreme Court Held that Appellate Review of Remand Order Extends to All Grounds for Removal. The fossilfuel companies removed the case in March 2021, citing five grounds for removal, including the federal officer removal statute. In a 7-1 decision, the U.S.
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in December 2017 and March 2018 because the environmental assessments for the lease sales failed to meet National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements, including by failing to take a hard look at cumulative climate change impacts.
The court noted that the administrative record currently documented the Corps’ decision to reissue NWP 12 in 2017. Ninth Circuit Heard Oral Argument in California Local Government Cases; FossilFuel Companies Said Juliana Decision Supported Their Position.
Supreme Court denied fossilfuel companies’ petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision reversing the district court’s 2018 denial of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change nuisance cases to California state court. DECISIONS & SETTLEMENTS. On June 14, 2021, the U.S.
Maryland County Filed Climate Change Lawsuit Against FossilFuel Companies and Trade Group. Annapolis, a city in the county, previously filed a separate lawsuit against fossilfuel companies.) Exxon Mobil Corp. , 451071/2021 (N.Y. BP p.l.c. , C-02-CV-21-000565 (Md. Chevron USA Inc. , 21-15318 (9th Cir. Sunoco LP , No.
While these nominations are dangerous, whats even more disturbing is the opening they create for fossilfuel corporations that have masterminded climate deception campaigns to regain social license. Major fossilfuel corporations lit the fuse decades ago Climate change denial is no accident.
On Inauguration Day, the United States also began the process of rejoining the ParisAgreement. Protections from Power Plants: Fossilfuel-fired power plants round out the trifecta of major sources of greenhouse gas emissions. Read more here>>> A Government-Wide Approach. Circuit struck down last year.
This post covers from approximately mid-June, 2017 up to August 31, 2017. pulling out of the Paris climate deal may make China great again. If elected governor, Graham says Florida would stick with Paris climate accord. . Meet the fossilfuel all-stars Trump has appointed to his administration. 2017.06.01.
The Trump Watch confidently predicts that Big Oil and Gas are about to receive an unimaginable return on their investments with the FossilFuel Dream Team. Coupled with the FossilFuel Dream Team Mr. Ebell’s appointment does not bode well for the serious, engaged and continued involvement of the U.S.
In theory it’s a rare opportunity to confront Trump with his disastrous 2017-2020 record as well as his apocalyptic 2025 gameplan. Trump: What did you accomplish by withdrawing from the ParisAgreement, which sets international climate targets but is largely non-binding? ” If that means a one-sided debate, so be it.
In September 2017, Eric Biber and I published a threat assessment after the first 200 days of the Trump Administration. The 2017 report was organized at the tool that Trump could use, rather than specific policy questions. The 2017 threat assessment. The 2017 threat assessment. The 2017 threat assessment.
We know now that Donald Trump will take office as the United States’ 47th president this January, and that his stated desires for federal climate policy include withdrawing from the ParisAgreement , easing restrictions on oil drilling , and “rescind[ing] all unspent” Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funds.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content