This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There has been comparatively less attention to the decision by climatescientist Dr. Susan Avery not to seek re-election to the ExxonMobil board of directors. Yet this shift in corporate leadership is significant, marking the end of a chapter in ExxonMobil’s long and ongoing history of climate deception and disinformation.
We don’t need Taylor Swift to “fall in love with a climatescientist,” we just wish she’d write a song about the climate crisis. When the breathless coverage of her relationship with Travis Kelce first boosted ratings for NFL football, some suggested Swift should use her star power for good by “dating a climatescientist.”
Climatescientists at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) have dubbed the six-month stretch from May through October “ Danger Season ” because of the confluence of extreme weather—record heat, raging wildfires, severe storms, and flooding—that is putting people at risk around the world.
That seems like a plausible scenario under climate change but seemingly hasn’t been established yet. As climatescientists predict, more rain is hitting Chicago in the form of intense storms. degrees Fahrenheit between 1951 and 2017.” ” Climate change is hitting home right in the middle of the country.
Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Superstorm Sandy in 2012, Hurricanes Harvey and Irma in 2017, and Hurricane Irma in 2021 were all accompanied by the same question. believe that “most” scientists agree on global warming and only 20 percent know that more than 90 percent of climatescientists agree that human-caused climate change is happening.
Accelerating risks from climate change are colliding with shortcomings in insurance markets—such as a lack of transparent information and affordability provisions—to create a perfect storm for people and communities on the front lines of floods, droughts, and wildfires.
I remember that federal relief funds went disproportionately to white victims of Hurricane Harvey’s massive flooding in Houston in 2017 while Black and Hispanic communities were largely excluded.
In this, he is in violent agreement with Isaac Held, his colleague at GFDL, and indeed most climatescientists. The proof of the pudding in climate model terms though are the quality and skill of the predictions. A recent paper Stouffer and Manabe (2017) , assessed how good the Manabe and Stouffer (1989) predictions were.
The note can also be interpreted as an insult because it suggests that we climatescientists do not know our subject. They apparently have not realised that both the UN climate panel and the professional communities in the USA and Europe have written a number of reports to do exactly that ( IPCC AR6 2021 , NCA 2017 , ESOTC2022 ).
By the end of the century, Montana could see several months a year with temperatures staying above 90 degrees, said Cathy Whitlock, a retired paleoclimate scientist at Montana State University who was the lead author of the 2017 Montana Climate Assessment.
Michael Mann - Climate Champion Award PennFuture honored Dr. Michael E. Mann, one of the world's best-known climatescientists and author, with the Climate Champion Award for his life's research on climate studies and the impacts of human-caused climate change. from Villanova University School of Law.
Image: Shutterstock.com Human impact on Antarctica not a new phenomenon So it is sadly not surprising, but alarming nonetheless, that this year’s winter sea-ice growth is the lowest on record, continuing a noticeable trend since 2017. Prof Martin Siegert is an award-winning Antarctic glaciologist and climatescientist.
One of the strongest names is that of Maisa Rojas, a renowned climatescientist who will take over as the new Minister for the Environment. “My For Marcelo Mena, himself a former Minister for the Environment (2017–2018), “water scarcity must be tackled through inter-sectoral coordination.
A 2017 study led by geographer Camilo Mora from the University of Hawaii found that around 30% of people around the world are already exposed to climatic conditions above this deadly threshold for at least 20 days a year ( Nature Climate Change 7 501 ). “One Spend too long in a wet-bulb temperature above 35?°C
Altering cloud properties influences Earth’s climate On sunny days, it’s clear that clouds leave shadows on the landscape. Climatescientists are interested in clouds for exactly this reason- clouds reflect sunlight, which has a cooling effect on surface temperatures. Cirrus clouds formed this way have many, small ice crystals.
California seeks to create a fund to pay for recovery from extreme events and for mitigation and adaptation efforts (without supplanting the climate damage lawsuits filed by eight California communities against the fossil fuel industry since 2017). Climatescientists, that’s who. degrees C) as “something magical.”
Since that 2014 study, which laid the foundation of what is called climate source attribution science , UCS scientists have collaborated with Heede on two other studies that pinpointed the major carbon producers’ culpability for specific climate change-related trends.
Sentencing was scheduled for February 3, 2017. The petitioners said they wished to obtain a ruling on the merits prior to the scheduled May 2017 completion date for the pipeline in the event that the D.C. Arizona Board of Regents Filed Notice of Appeal in ClimateScientist Public Records Case. United States v.
Climatescientists at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) have dubbed the six-month stretch from May through October the “ Danger Season.” Not only has much of what climatescientists have been warning about come to pass, many of the extreme weather events the planet is now experiencing are worse than they expected. “To
In 2022, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center calculated that the number of people who died from heat-related causes between 2008 and 2017 was two to three times higher than federal figures.
Someone that did connect the dots was US president Joe Biden who said: “The past few days of Hurricane Ida and the wildfires in the West and the unprecedented flash floods in New York and New Jersey is yet another reminder that these extreme storms and the climate crisis are here. We need to be much better prepared. We need to act”.
Elsewhere , I documented how these and subsequent US public policy actions set the stage for Puerto Rico’s contemporary social vulnerabilities that have come full circle in disastrous social, economic, and climatic consequences for the archipelago after Hurricane María in 2017. The risk of landslides is also high.
The appellate court therefore ruled that state courts were without jurisdiction to consider claims that a California Environmental Quality Act review should have considered the impacts of climate change on continued operation of the dam. Court Dismissed Counterclaims in ClimateScientist’s Defamation Lawsuit. Ireland , 2017 No.
Meanwhile, the American Petroleum Institute (API)—in which Shell holds a leadership role—launched a voluntary methane program in 2017 that internal documents reveal was explicitly designed “ to stave off future regulation.” It also marks the end of the Board tenure of climatescientist Dr. Susan Avery.
He emphasized that “The harms associated with climate change are serious and well recognized.”. Justice Alito was a dissenting vote in that 5-4 decision and later explained his decision in a 2017 speech to the right-wing Claremont Institute. “A Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. There is now a 99.9 After the Massachusetts v.
This approach has been used to assess the responsibility of specific entities, such as national governments and carbon emitting companies, to climate change-related harms. Climatescientists have also compiled a substantial body of research on the relationship between anthropogenic climate change and ecological impacts.
During his presidency, Donald Trump had approved a permit for the line in 2017, but it continued to face legal challenges that hampered construction. Would have been game-over for the climate. Opponents of the line fought it for years, saying it was unnecessary and would hamper the US transition to clean energy. .”
To get an assessment of the progress thus far, as well as an idea if what has to happen next, I turned to two of my colleagues in the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) Climate & Energy Program: Principal ClimateScientist Rachel Licker and Transmission Policy Manager Sam Gomberg. Our work is having a major impact.
A few days after the California court issued its order, North Dakota and Texas asked the Wyoming federal court to lift a stay that the court had imposed in December 2017. Arizona Court Ordered Production of ClimateScientists’ Emails Under Arizona’s Public Records Law. 2017 CA 006685 B (D.C. 34-2015-80002005 (Cal.
Citing Shortcomings in NEPA Analysis of Cumulative Climate and Groundwater Impacts, Montana Federal Court Vacated Oil and Gas Leases. The proceedings have been held in abeyance since August 2017 while EPA considers whether and how to amend the regulations.
She previously worked as the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks director from 2017–2020 and was an assistant professor of law at the University of Montana. More News: ‘A step to nowhere’: Russian scientist organizes protest of Ukraine war – ScienceInsider. 6617 ) Feb.
Climatescientists, backed by robust research, say so. C found that surpassing 2 degrees C of warming would significantly increase the frequency and severity of climate impacts, including extreme weather events, biodiversity loss, and threats to human health and livelihoods. degrees Celsius) as something magical.
In addition, Koch Industries spent more than $38 million on its Washington lobbying operation during the last two full election cycles, from 2017 through 2020. Climatescientists, he added, “have these models that show it, but the models don’t work….”. In the 2018 and 2020 election cycles, Koch Industries’ total outlay of $26.7
2017); [link].]] These goals further match commitments under the UNFCCC Paris Climate Agreement, which the Administration has reentered, and all together correspond to an imperative to share responsibility to avoid a global temperature rise above 1.5-2.0º 2019); Birckhead v. FERC , 925 F.3d 3d 510 (D.C. 2019); Sierra Club v.
This post covers from approximately mid-June, 2017 up to August 31, 2017. A few general resources: Sidelining Science Since Day One: How the Trump administration has harmed public health and safety in its first six months by The Union of Concerned Scientists I Heart ClimateScientists. . July 2017. .
climate change and biodiversity conservation policies, including the 2050 net-zero emissions goal and the “30 by 30” conservation goal. Gonzalez is a forest ecologist who is adjunct faculty at the University of California, Berkeley and the leading climatescientist for the National Park Service.
After Hurricane Irma in 2017, Florida relied on more than $5.5 This NPR article speaks to what will be at stake if FEMA is taken out of the equation: Without FEMA, states would need to find thousands of additional personnel to inspect damage, distribute disaster aid and plan the rebuilding of public infrastructure.
Even when Republicans controlled both the House and Senate in 2017 and 2018, Congress largely rejected these steep cuts. Climate Change Forces Brutal Choices at National Parks – The New York Times. Top ClimateScientist Blasts Government Lab After Denier Invited to Speak – Gizmodo. What to Save?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content