This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Its been almost nine years since ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) stakeholders celebrated President Obamas enactment of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (Lautenberg) on June 22, 2016.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) denied a 2016 petition filed under Section 21 of the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) requesting that EPA consider whether fluoride in drinking water presents an unreasonable risk of injury to human health, a coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGO) promptly filed suit in the U.S.
This week, I discuss ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) developments with my colleague,Dr. Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) implementation of the 2016 Frank R. Engler, Director of Chemistry for B&C and The Acta Group (Acta), our consulting affiliate.
It has been almost nine years since ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) stakeholders celebrated President Obamas enactment on June 22, 2016, of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (Lautenberg).
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as directed by the 2016 amendment to the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA), is required to The post Register Now for “What’s New with New Approach Methodologies: A Webinar Featuring EPA CCTEs Katie Paul Friedman, Ph.D.,
Toxicologist Linda Birnbaum blames the nationwide struggle with emerging contaminants on the failings of three landmark federal environmental laws — the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act and the ToxicSubstancesControlAct — that are supposed to keep pollutants out of our environment.
(Haifa) to pay a civil penalty of $664,267 “for violations of chemical data reporting regulations under the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA).” EPA states that it alleged that Haifa failed to submit a data report required under TSCA for 32 chemical substances that Haifa had imported between 2016 and 2019.
(B&C®), the Environmental Law Institute (ELI), and the George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health for a day-long conference reflecting on the challenges and accomplishments since the implementation of the 2016 Lautenberg Amendments and where the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) stands today.
This hybrid conference marked the eighth ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) Annual Conference, reflecting on the accomplishments and challenges since the implementation of the 2016 Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (Lautenberg Act) and where TSCA stands today.
The conference focuses on ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) implementation challenges and accomplishments since the enactment in 2016 of the Frank R. (B&C®), the Environmental Law Institute (ELI), and the George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed amendments to the regulations that govern the Agency’s review of new chemicals under the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) to improve efficiency and align with the 2016 bipartisan TSCA amendments under the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act.
(EDT) on its recent final procedural rule for submitting confidential business information (CBI) under the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA). The final rule increases transparency, modernizes the reporting and review procedures for CBI, and aligns with the 2016 amendments to TSCA.
” For decades, the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) has been regarded as a “chemical producer” law that retailers, product manufacturers, and other “article” manufacturers could, for the most part, comfortably ignore. TSCA was significantly amended in 2016, and the U.S. Not anymore.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) extended the comment period on proposed amendments to the new chemicals procedural regulations under the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA).
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate industrial chemical substances is the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA), an almost 47-year-old law significantly amended in 2016 by the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (Lautenberg).
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on November 23, 2021, legally mandated changes to the fee requirements under the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA). According to EPA, as a result of this and other factors, TSCA fees collected since the 2016 amendments have covered only half of the 25 percent target.
” This complimentary virtual conference marks the fifth ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) Annual Conference, reflecting on the accomplishments and challenges since the implementation of the 2016 Lautenberg Amendments and where TSCA stands today.
On June 29, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) released its first year implementation plan for the recently-enacted amendments to the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (“TSCA”). This is Part II of our TSCA update following the recent changes to the TSCA legislation.
On June 22, 2016, President Obama signed the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21 st Century Act (the “Act”), which significantly amended the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (“TSCA”). A follow-up article will explore the EPA’s recently released plan for implementing these changes. See [link].
It wasn’t until the introduction of the Clean Air Act in 1970 that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was able to legally regulate asbestos, specifically the use of spray-on asbestos products. In late 2016, the EPA formally. that would be examined under the Lautenberg Act, one of which was asbestos. Since then, a.
The risk evaluation is being conducted under amendments to the ToxicSubstancesControlAct that were signed into law in 2016. Public comments are being accepted through June 20. Nominations are due April 24. Submission guidelines are in the above link. Federal Water Tap is a weekly digest spotting trends in U.S.
It is ironic, however, that EPA is applying the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) in ways that are counterproductive to achieving these goals. Since enactment in 2016 of the Frank R. Key to the analysis is the “reasonable” foreseeability of that use.
According to EPA’s rule list , the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) is working on the following rulemakings under the ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA). More information on EPA’s 2016 proposed rule is available in our July 29, 2016, memorandum.
Freedhoff also served on the staffs of the House Science Committee, the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and the House Natural Resources Committee.
Indeed, the PFAS disaster points once again to the failure of our laws regulating toxic chemicals, which were intended to avoid just these sorts of problems. But even after twenty years of effort, basic safety information is still missing for the vast majority of chemicals sold in the EU.
A key force propelling reform of the ToxicSubstancesControlAct through Congress in 2016 was a bipartisan belief, shared by the business and environmental communities alike, that the Environmental Protection Agency needs more information to do its job of protecting the American public from adverse effects caused by chemical exposures.
Bergeson * It has been almost nine years since ToxicSubstancesControlAct (TSCA) stakeholders celebrated President Obamas enactment on June 22, 2016, of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (Lautenberg). Posted on January 29, 2025 by Lynn L.
Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. that restrict mercury, arsenic, lead, and other poisonous emissions by coal- and oil-burning power plants; narrowing the scope of a 2016. law mandating safety assessments for potentially toxic chemicals, like dry-cleaning solvents and paint strippers; and eliminating two programs.
Our primary focus continues to be on chemical substances which are the subject of regulatory activity or scrutiny by various government agencies and potential litigants. EPA finalized a risk management rule for decaBDE and four other PBT substances in early January. 21-70168, 21-70670 (9th Cir. June 30, 2021).]]
Our primary focus continues to be on chemical substances which are the subject of regulatory activity or scrutiny by various federal and state government agencies and potential litigants. Chemical Importers Agreed to Pay Penalties for Violations of 2016 Chemical Data Reporting Rule. EPA, Pay $117,000 in Fines (Oct. 6, 2021).]]
EPA’s efforts to regulate vinyl chloride as a hazardous air pollutant under section 112 of the Clean Air Act also went on for more than a decade and was ultimately a big part of the reason why Congress overhauled that section of the statute in the 1990 amendments.
Our primary focus continues to be on chemical substances which are the subject of regulatory activity or scrutiny by various government agencies and potential litigants. EPA said specific identities of the 390 chemicals were reported as non-confidential in the 2012, 2016, or 2020 reports submitted under the Chemical Data Reporting rule.
Our primary focus continues to be on chemical substances which are the subject of regulatory activity or scrutiny by various government agencies and potential litigants. EPA Published Final Risk Management Rules for Five Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and ToxicSubstances; Biden Administration to Review. 16, 2016); 82 Fed.
Regulatory determinations under SDWA trigger EPA's process for developing national primary drinking water regulations (NPDWRs), which are enforceable drinking water standards in contrast to the health advisories EPA established for PFOA and PFOS in 2016.
The grant program ended in 2016 due to a lack of funding. The House Transportation and Infrastructure approved the Promoting United Government Efforts to Save Our Sound (PUGET SOS) Act ( R. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Amphibians in Decline Conservation Fund. 1144 ) from by Rep. Comments are due Apr.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content