This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A new dataset released by InfluenceMap provides information on heat-trapping emissions traced to the 122 largest investor and state-owned fossilfuel companies in the world. Fossilfuels are the main driver of climate change and the terrifying effects of it that we see happening across the world.
The future trajectories are based on different scenarios, such as versions of the future where the world comes together to take action and phase out fossilfuels, or versions where fossilfuel production continues throughout this century. One team found that emissions just up until 2016 could lead to approximately 2.33.6
Last week, I participated in the Scientists Speakout Day during the Summer of Heat on Wall Street , to protest and disrupt the financial institutions that are enabling the fossilfuel industry (and, as a result, our current climate crisis).
As of 2016, half of its total emissions are from the power sector, with 20% from industry and 15% from transportation, and. According to the Energy Information Agency , South Korea’s power sector is heavily reliant on fossilfuels. Actual generation is tilted a bit more toward fossilfuels and nuclear.
Two-thirds of the G20’s public finance for energy went to fossilfuels in 2019–2020. The G20 group of nations provided nearly US$200 billion in support of fossilfuels in 2021, despite the worsening impacts of the climate crisis and their pledge in 2009 to phase out “inefficient” subsidies. By Catherine Early.
A 2022 Rainforest Action Network repor t found that “fossilfuel financing from the world’s 60 largest banks has reached USD $4.6 trillion in the six years since the adoption of the ParisAgreement, with $742 billion in fossilfuel financing in 2021 alone.” The biggest US bank investors in fossilfuels? “At
There’s a direct line of culpability between fossilfuel corporations and climate change – it’s why so many oil and gas CEOs have topped our list of Climate Villains. But they aren’t the only powerful players who shoulder responsibility for keeping us hooked on fossilfuels, the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions.
target set by the ParisAgreement – and an astonishing 0.17 C hotter than the second-hottest year to date, 2016. The science guy has been doing interviews about how the eclipse is a moment of reflection on the importance of science and its warning about burning fossilfuels. The annual-average temperature was 1.48
Canada promised to cut its greenhouse gas emissions after the 2016ParisAgreement. It was part of the global agreement where 195 countries all agreed to reduce their emissions, and Canada has set this promise into law. However, we have heard that the government wants to label fossilfuels as green under this new system.
Central to these questions is the role of fossilfuels, which have long been seen as the backbone of economic growth, but now threaten to interfere with international climate goals. In a July 2016 report , the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs described climate change as the “single biggest threat to development.”
See for instance Benestad (2016). The Heat is On , Climate cover-up , The Merchants of Doubt ), and during the UN’s last climate meeting, California’s governor, Gavin Newsom , explained how interests from the fossilfuel industry work hard to prevent emission cuts and undermine climate science. 679-688, 2016.
Shell is well on track to meet its own (rather ambitious) targets for reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50% below 2016 levels by 2030. This leads to an important distinction between fossilfuels specifically produced or merely traded by Shell, as discussed in more detail below.
Last month, the British-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) reported that London-based HSBC, one of the world’s top-10 biggest banks, has helped raise $47 billion for the fossilfuel industry since its 2022 announcement that it would not finance new gas and oil infrastructure. degrees Celsius, or 2.7
As one of the world’s top funders of fossilfuels, taking over HSBC’s Canadian operations, at a time when its parent company was already taking concrete action to lower its financed emissions, is a significant step backwards on climate.
Read on to learn why and how more than a thousand scientists issued an open letter urging JPMorgan Chase shareholders to vote in favor of a time-bound phaseout of financing for new fossilfuel development and exploration at the bank’s annual meeting on May 16. Those three alone borrowed more than $200 billion between 2016 and 2021.
As part of its ongoing investigation of fossilfuel industry climate disinformation, the US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform released more than 200 pages of internal corporate documents last month that provide new evidence of industry deception. Companies Plot “Greenwashing” Campaigns.
Two steps forward, one step back: In February 2016, the Supreme Court issued a. international climate change agreement. the ParisAgreement) that will require periodic, rigorous accounting and management of total national emissions. the ParisAgreement. stay on implementation. social cost of carbon.
The Gwadar coal power plant was first conceived in 2016, with an estimated cost of USD 542.32 Pakistan’s energy sector is dominated by fossilfuels. According to the country’s Finance Division , as of April 2022, just under 60% of total installed generation capacity used fossilfuels, including gas, oil and coal.
CO 2 is at about 410 parts per million by volume (ppm) in the air, about 50% higher than before the start of large-scale fossil-fuel use. The most important recent change was a new measurement of methane’s infrared absorption in 2016. Atmospheric concentrations. ppm, but that level is about 2.6 shorter time-horizon GWPs).
According to the petitioner, as a signatory to the ParisAgreement Brazil has committed to various duties to mitigate climate change. Through the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) published in 2016, Brazil committed to reducing GHG emissions by 37% by 2025 and by 43% by 2030 as compared to a 2005 baseline.
The district court ruled that EPA was required to conduct such evaluations in October 2016 and set an expedited schedule for EPA’s compliance. 451962/2016 (N.Y. The standards and guidelines were published on August 29, 2016. The court indicated that the attorney general had broad power to propound the interrogatories.
cases challenging fossilfuel companies for decades of climate disinformation remain stalled, tied up by the defendants in procedural wrangling that prevents them from being heard on their merits, delaying justice for affected communities. Over 140 such cases have been filed globally since 2016, with 47 new filings in 2023 alone.
Fourth Circuit Declined to Stay Remand Order in Baltimore’s Climate Case Against FossilFuel Companies; Companies Sought Stay from Supreme Court. All five have signed the ParisAgreement but, according to petitioners, none have made or kept commitments that align with keeping temperature rise under 2 degrees Celsius.
While by no means exhaustive, the information that I collected helps tell the story of energy policy on the ground across America during the Trump Administration from 2016-2020. In reflecting on the past administration’s impact on energy policy, a state-by-state analysis reveals a more positive picture than many feared in 2016.
Nations remain far apart in reaching agreement on a new climate finance commitment from richer countries and will need to double down on efforts over the next few days to secure an ambitious outcome. Those investments will deliver huge climate and public health benefits from reduced fossilfuel pollution. Meanwhile,
At this year’s annual general meetings, major investor-owned fossilfuel corporations are facing fewer climate-related shareholder proposals than at any time since the adoption of the Paris climate agreement in 2015. Such doublespeak is the latest evolution in the fossilfuel industry’s deception playbook.
First, he promised to re-join the ParisAgreement on `the first day in office´, second, he wants to embark on an ambitious phase-out programme for fossilfuels and third he promised to re-join the Iran Nuclear Deal. The earliest possible departure for the US from the ParisAgreement would, accordingly, be 4 November 2020.
The challenge originates with the Obama Administration’s 2015 Clean Power Plan , which required states to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants by 32 percent (below 2005 levels) by 2030, in line with the national commitment under the ParisAgreement. The Clean Power Plan never went into effect.
The federal district court for the Northern District of California denied Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change public nuisance lawsuits against five major fossilfuel producers to state court. Foster , 34-2016-CR-00187 (N.D. NEW CASES, MOTIONS, AND NOTICES. Village of Old Mill Creek v.
At the start of the recent COP 27 climate meeting in Egypt, a United Nations report on the role of financial institutions in controlling climate change said, “There is no room for new investment in fossilfuel supply.”. With COP 27 now concluded, fossilfuel investment remains the elephant in the room.
The plaintiffs alleged that Peabody (and a number of other fossilfuel companies) caused greenhouse gas emissions that resulted in sea level rise and damage to their property. Peabody, a coal company, filed for bankruptcy in April 2016 and emerged from bankruptcy under a plan that became effective on April 3, 2017. Foster , No.
Ninth Circuit Heard Oral Argument in California Local Government Cases; FossilFuel Companies Said Juliana Decision Supported Their Position. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on February 5, 2020 in the appeals in California local governments’ climate change cases against fossilfuel companies.
George: Your Op Ed lays out how in 2016, when you were leading negotiations with Canadian provinces to write a national climate plan, oil industry players were publicly supportive but working against us from the inside. It will not feel good, like in 2015 when we were elected, the ParisAgreement it felt good.
The Washington Supreme Court ruled that a climate activist should be permitted to present a necessity defense to charges of criminal trespass and unlawful obstruction of a train in connection with a 2016 protest on railroad tracks used by trains carrying coal and oil products. The cases were filed in 2016 , 2020 , and 2021.
While these nominations are dangerous, whats even more disturbing is the opening they create for fossilfuel corporations that have masterminded climate deception campaigns to regain social license. Major fossilfuel corporations lit the fuse decades ago Climate change denial is no accident.
Circuit in 2016 signaled that the legal framework for the Clean Power Plan “hinges on important issues of federal that EPA then—and the court below now—got so wrong this Court was likely to grant review.” Maryland County Filed Climate Change Lawsuit Against FossilFuel Companies and Trade Group. Exxon Mobil Corp. , BP p.l.c. ,
Unlike 2016, when the outcome was a complete surprise to many people, we’re in a position to think ahead about possible policy shifts and possible responses. Everything so far in the campaign indicates no shift in Trump’s view of energy policy, which emphasizes national dominance through fossilfuels. climate policy.
As CEO of Exxon Mobil, the world’s largest publicly-traded oil business, Tillerson’s 2016 compensation was $24.3 The Trump Watch confidently predicts that Big Oil and Gas are about to receive an unimaginable return on their investments with the FossilFuel Dream Team. into the atmosphere each year, with no end in sight.
A timeline of events 2008 Presidential Election: Musk supports Barack Obama 2012 Presidential Election: Musk supports Barack Obama 2014 – Musk described himself politically as half Democrat and half Republican 2016 Musk voiced support for Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Direct Democracy as a response to the threat of Artificial Intelligence (..)
52
52
Input your email to sign up, or if you already have an account, log in here!
Enter your email address to reset your password. A temporary password will be e‑mailed to you.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content