article thumbnail

Clean Water Act: EPA Needs to Better Assess and Disclose Quality of Compliance and Enforcement Data

Environmental News Bits

What GAO Found Since 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has modified one of its three national initiatives emphasizing compliance with the Clean Water Act and has discontinued two others (see fig.). Download the document.

article thumbnail

The Clean Water Act might now have a broader reach in States that challenged EPA’s and the Corps’ pre-Sackett WOTUS rule than in those that didn’t.

Acoel

In the 27 states where the ninth attempt wasn’t enjoined, EPA and the Corps are going to apply the “pre-2015 regulatory regime” to determine the reach of the Clean Water Act. What does EPA mean when it refers to the “pre-2015 regulatory regime?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

WOTUS Update: Breaking Down the Pre-2015 Regulatory Regime

National Law Center

In late August, a court in the District of Arizona issued a decision vacating the Navigable Waters Protection Rule (“NWPR”), the. The post WOTUS Update: Breaking Down the Pre-2015 Regulatory Regime appeared first on National Agricultural Law Center.

2015 105
article thumbnail

Back to the Future: Waters of United States Reverts to Pre-2015 Definition

Environment Next

District Court for the District of Arizona vacated a 2020 rulemaking that had pared back protections to certain bodies of water (see attached August 30, 2021 Opinion ). The 2020 rulemaking replaced a 2015 rule defining “waters of the United States” more broadly under the Clean Water Act. In 2015, the U.S.

2015 52
article thumbnail

U.S EPA and Army Corps Revert Back to Pre-2015 Interpretation of “Waters of the United States”

Vorys Law

EPA’s website indicating the that Agencies have halted implementation of the Navigable Waters Protection Rule and are reverting back to the pre-2015 regulatory regime for interpreting the meaning of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) subject to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act.

2015 40
article thumbnail

2023 WOTUS Rule Enjoined in Texas and Idaho (Or “Here We Go Again”)

Acoel

Like a predecessor rule in 2015 which attempted to broaden the definition of WOTUS, numerous states and industry groups have challenged the 2023 WOTUS rule. The court also acknowledged that the Supreme Court is currently considering the scope of jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. Texas, et al. 3:23-cv-32 (D.N.D.),

2023 105
article thumbnail

Aggregating the Harms of Fossil Fuels

Legal Planet

The extraction phase can involve destruction of lands, risks to endangered species, water pollution from oil spills or leaching from mines, and serious dangers to workers. According to a recent report , three-quarters of all proposed coal power projects have been canceled since 2015. Download as PDF.