This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Data on the major carbon producers’ emissions have been published since 2014. When thinking about global emissions, don’t picture an individual—point your finger at powerful corporations, specifically the 88 companies that are largely responsible for climatechange. The database is transparent and available for all to see.
Photo by Mathias Reding on Unsplash Climatechange litigation has finally reached the world’s highest court. On March 29, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the obligations of States with respect to climatechange.
Of all the troubling headlines emerging from the release of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC) WG1 report, one warning will surely dominate headlines in the next days and weeks: Earth is likely to reach the crucial 1.5? 2 of the ParisAgreement as “pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5ºC”.
The Parisagreement calls for capping warming as near as possible to 1.5° As of today, the “extent and magnitude of climatechange impacts are larger than estimated in previous assessments.” Most of that discussion was at a very general level. Here, I want to focus on several key points in the report. C in the near?
And this problem will only get worse as the impacts of climatechange become more frequent and severe. While it’s clear we need to rapidly reduce gas generation to help limit the worst impacts of climatechange, it’s less clear how much fossil gas capacity we actually need to maintain reliability in a future decarbonized grid.
After the EPA proposed the Clean Power Plan in 2014, for example, fossil fuel interests and their backers tried to argue that the proposal’s 2030 emission-reduction targets were completely unrealistic, and that the country would see astronomically high costs and blackouts due to the rule. degrees Celsius.
Solar activity provides no alternative explanation for today’s climatechange Dagsvik and Moen claim that recent research indicates that variations in the sun’s magnetic field are of great importance for long-term fluctuations in solar activity. Our job is to be thorough and verify questionable results. It has taken time.
In this blog post, we will briefly explain (i) the background of climatechange laws in Colombia, (ii) the nature and reach of the ‘ Acción de Cumplimiento ,’ and (iii) the two judgments and their implications for climate action in Colombia. Law 1715 of 2014 on non-conventional renewable energy sources.
Under the ParisAgreement, countries will need to track greenhouse gas emissions at the level of individual ‘super emitters’, such as power plants, in close-to-real time. Countries signed up to the 2015 ParisAgreement have committed themselves to keep the rise in average global temperature ‘well below’ 2 °C.
There’s a direct line of culpability between fossil fuel corporations and climatechange – it’s why so many oil and gas CEOs have topped our list of Climate Villains. Will you help hold the financial sector accountable for real climate action?
On March 9, 2023, the Japanese Supreme Court refused to hear the first climatechange litigation brought before it without specifying substantive reasons. The Plaintiffs in the Kobe Civil Case claimed a violation of personal rights to life, bodily integrity and health on account of climatechange.
But this simplified pathway misses a key step in cloud formation–and one that could help us combat climatechange. The ParisAgreement is an international treaty adopted at the United Nations ClimateChange Conference in 2015, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C C temperature target.
The second week of COP22 – the 22 nd Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on ClimateChange (UNFCCC) – got underway yesterday in Marrakech. A key focus of the discussions will likely be on financing climatechange mitigation and adaptation in developing countries.
of climatechange. The majority of the world’s poor are women, and more women rely on climate vulnerable natural resources for their livelihood. Over the past 15 years, UNFCCC Parties have started recognizing the important role women can have in climate negotiations, and the many barriers that prevent them from participating.
The January 2023 decision focused on 2 distinctive issues which are explored in this blog: (1) application of the Guideline and (2) the plaintiffs’ standing claims based on specific climatechange impacts on fishing as a livelihood. In reality, however, the eight old coal-fired power plants had been shut down since 2014.
In 2010, the SEC published interpretive guidance (2010 Guidance) for public companies regarding disclosure requirements relating to climatechange matters.[[N:Securities N:Securities and Exchange Commission, Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to ClimateChange (Release Nos. iii) the physical impacts of climatechange.
laws governing the cross-border transport of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) for sequestration, and how such transportation fits into broader climate and environmental protection regimes, including the ParisAgreement on ClimateChange, carbon markets and emissions trading. Louis in 2014.
We are still heading in the opposite direction to that required by the ParisAgreement.” And to reduce emissions drastically to meet what was agreed at the ParisAgreement now seems an uphill task. to its highest level since 2014. Coal stayed dominant at 34.5%, with consumption rising by 0.6%
The past two years have yielded unprecedented executive and regulatory engagement in the climatechange discussion. In November 2014, the United States and China—two of the world’s most significant emitters—. international climatechangeagreement. the ParisAgreement. jointly committed.
From our work on shipping emissions, plastic pollution, ocean climate justice and ghost gear, the need for greater action is clear to us at Ocean Conservancy. billion were made, bringing the total to more than 1,800 total commitments worth approximately $108 billion since 2014. Thanks for signing up for Ocean Conservancy emails.
An ambitious annual target, like 7%, could put us on track to meet the ParisAgreement goals, and keep us in line with a 1.5°C Setting a target like 4-5% could get us to zero by 2050, well in line with Climate Envoy John Kerry’s commitment in April. C warming scenario.
Brazil’s National Policy on ClimateChange ( NPCC and subsequent regulation ) was adopted in 2009 based on Brazil’s international commitments with the UNFCCC. According to the petitioner, as a signatory to the ParisAgreement Brazil has committed to various duties to mitigate climatechange.
By Rejimon Kuttappan Along with a major expansion of renewable energy, India is also pushing for big increases in its coal production, casting doubt on its climate commitments. On the same day at COP28, the Indian government submitted its third “National Communication” to the UN Framework Convention on ClimateChange (UNFCCC).
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. and non-U.S.
After an extra year’s delay and a summer of climatechange-induced disasters , the 26 th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on ClimateChange (COP26) entered its second week on Monday. Protecting the carbon sink forests provide is critical in the fight against climatechange.
That has changed, but the relationship with Russia is still only at the top of the second-tier priority list. Russia considers itself to be in a much stronger position today than in 2014 when the US imposed sanctions over its involvement in Crimea. It isn’t considered a first-tier priority. For Moscow, that probably suits equally well.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 126. and non-U.S. Supreme Court.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 103. and non-U.S.
Framework Convention on ClimateChange (UNFCCC). climate policy. remains a party to the UNFCCC , helped broker the ParisAgreement, and is till a party to that agreement today. 2014 Supreme Court decides UARG v. 2015 ParisAgreement adopted with strong U.S. 2020 U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 107. and non-U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 133. By Margaret Barry and Hillary Aidun.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 147. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for ClimateChange Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 148. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.
Damn, it’s Awfully Hot!” – So Long to The Federal Government’s Meddlesome Efforts to Combat ClimateChange. With only one brief peek, it is exceedingly clear that very little will remain of the federal efforts to address climatechange once President Trump takes charge. 2, 2014). [8]. 6, 2012). [7]. Vanity Fair.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content