This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
After slowing new purchases during the Great Recession, railroads bought a large volume of new locomotives, both to replace aging stock and to avoid stronger pollutioncontrols. But it isn’t just the waiver request where the federal government has been missing in action.
Billions of tons of ash have been scrubbed from air, flushed from the bottom of furnaces and washed and dried from pollutioncontrol equipment. About 10 percent of the more than 45 billion tons of coal burned in the United States since 1970, most of it for electricity, ends up as coal ash, one of the nation’s largest waste streams.
This legal battle has both a long history and enormous implications for California’s aggressive pollutioncontrol and climate change policies. Near the end of his time in office in 2008, President George W. Bush’s EPA issued the first-ever rejection of a California waiver request under CAA section 209(b).
Following his service with DER, Paul worked as a Field Representative for the Joint Air & Water PollutionControl Conservation Committee (JLCC) for the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 1981/1982. (In In 1969 Ralph W.
It then tread water for a few years and began a steep decline in 2008, going from half of U.S. Regulation may have made a difference, since coal requires more extensive pollutioncontrols than competing fuels. Since around 2008, natural gas use has been the mirror image of coal use. electricity to about one-fifth today.
A couple years ago , I detailed how an industry designed to increase and sell devices tampering with pollutioncontrols was trying to use the extremely small slice of its business targeted at racing as a Trojan horse to hinder EPA enforcement and let loose a bevy of tampering devices on the American public.
The report, The Thin Green Line, looks at staffing levels and funding for environmental programs between 2008 and 2018 in the lower 48 states. The report compares 2018 funding levels to both 2008 dollars and inflation-adjusted 2008 dollars. 2008 Funding. Inflation Adjusted 2008 Funding. 2018 Funding. $116
Davenport, Iowa, is used to such floods — waters reached similar levels in 2019, 2014, and 2008. In releasing this wastewater the facility violated a national permit, though according to the Minnesota PollutionControl Agency, the majority of the release was “clear storm water” and the threat to public health is “slim.”
Battery-electric trucks are one of the most cost-effective and consequential technologies we have to reduce pollution from vehicles. These trucks tend to be older models without modern pollutioncontrols. Take the diesel “drayage” trucks that operate near ports and transfer cargo to distribution centers.
Five water systems in the community, which have been under long-term drinking water advisories since 2008, are now being served by a new water filtration plant. The Minnesota PollutionControl Agency announced a new statewide monitoring system for PFAS, the family of toxic chemicals sweeping across water systems in the Midwest and beyond.
million put into budgetary reserve in 2008-09 from the Department of Environmental Protection and Department of Conservation and Natural Resources; -- $5 million reduction in Resource Enhancement and Protection (REAP) farm conservation tax credit program in FY 2009-10; -- $102.8 million from DEP, $1.5 million; DCNR: $1.5 million; and DEP: $4.2
Since this final-form rulemaking is being promulgated under the APCA [state Air PollutionControl Act] in Title 35, the requirements of Act 52 do not apply. Even so, the Board amended this final-form rulemaking to clarify that the control measures are only applicable to unconventional sources of VOC emissions.”
This document, issued pursuant to section 303(d) of the Federal Water PollutionControl Act, is a major step in addressing a problem that has garnered national attention. Through the TMDL the Ohio EPA seeks to achieve a 40 percent reduction in total phosphorus loading, based on a 2008 baseline, with a three percent margin of safety.
In 2008, Congress directed EPA to develop a rule to “require mandatory reporting of GHG emissions above appropriate thresholds in all sectors of the economy.” The SEC’s regime is an investor protection program, and nowhere in the SEC’s rule does a stated goal of pollutioncontrol or GHG emission reduction appear.
After inspecting the in-stream and bank work in August and September, DEP cited the company for the failure of a coffer dam, inadequate pollutioncontrols on streambanks, illegally blocking the entire stream, failure to report sediment pollution and not following approved sediment control measures.
06-31238, 2008 WL 588745 (5th Cir. 2008), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to dismiss a qui tam action brought under the Federal Claims Act (FCA). By Clare Bienvenu In Marcy v.
Since this final-form rulemaking is being promulgated under the APCA [state Air PollutionControl Act] in Title 35, the requirements of Act 52 do not apply. Even so, the Board amended this final-form rulemaking to clarify that the control measures are only applicable to unconventional sources of VOC emissions.”
The Commons was a 2008 initiative spearheaded by IBM, and ultimately joined by twelve additional. The Commons was created as a type of patent pool of green technology related patents.
To determine the amount of the emissions cap, the state agency (Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, which later became the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”)) would first determine the corresponding emissions from each emissions unit under the cap if it had pollutioncontrols at the BACT level.
the Department will develop a separate rulemaking for the RACT requirements for sources of VOC emissions installed at conventional well sites” since the regulations covering oil and gas facilities are being promulgated to attain both the federal 2008 and 2015 ozone standard. The Preamble to the revised rulemaking says “.
list of dates and locations since 2008, and even provided an appendix of dates and locations where [they] believed BNSF to have discharged pollutants in the manner described.”. Spokane Riverkeeper, and Natural Resources Defense Council––took big coal and the railroad to court.
SIP Call, the EPA distributed allowances to power plants and other large industrial polluters on the basis of cost of pollutioncontrol. The EPA then assumed that each polluter in the NO. At the end of every year, each polluter had to have enough allowances to cover its ozone season (May-September) NO. Michigan v.
The Coke Machine: The Dirty Truth Behind the World's Favorite Soft Drink by Michael Blanding (2010) Belching Out the Devil: Global Adventures with Coca-Cola by Mark Thomas (2008). Elmore (2014) Coca-Cola: The Alternative Report by War on Want (2006) The Coke Machine by Michael Blanding (2010).
CAFOs, though, are the only industrial polluting facilities not required to treat their wastes. The federal waiver for treating CAFO wastes dramatically reduces pollutioncontrol and operating costs. tried again with a new rule in 2008 that limited the permitting obligation to CAFOs that “propose to discharge” wastes.
The Washington Court of Appeals held that the PollutionControl Hearing Board erred when it approved the Washington Department of Ecology’s general permits for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). June 25, 2021). Washington State Dairy Federation v. Washington Department of Ecology , No. 52952-1-II (Wash. June 29, 2021).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content