This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It is mind- bog -gling, syllable pun intended, that scientists still do not know how many wetlands lost protection in last year’s crippling of the CleanWaterAct by the Supreme Court. In others , water flows into underground aquifers. And then there are ephemeral streams that run only during rainfalls.
oil and gas industry produced an estimated one trillion gallons of produced water in 2017. And this waste—along with drilling and fracking waste--can contain radioactive elements known as “technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material,” or TENORM. What does this mean for workers and communities?
Los Angeles is a leader in using the federal CleanWaterAct tool of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) to mitigate a major contributing source of marine trash: urban stormwater. Inevitably, municipal solid waste collection fails to capure all trash. Wind blows waste out of landfills. CleanWaterAct. ,
She contends the federal Natural Gas Act mandates the federal Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has “exclusive jurisdiction over an appeal which challenges any state agency’s action in either approving or denying a permit when the state agency acts on the basis of federal law.”
The Supreme Court is stepping once more into CleanWaterAct “waters of the United States,” more popularly known as WOTUS. If you’re a CleanWaterAct wonk, there may be a little voice in the back of your head yelling, “Theeeey’re baaack!” United States.
By Claire Bienvenu On May 23, 2008, the Ninth Circuit vacated EPA’s rule exempting discharges of sediment resulting from oil and gas construction activities from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. 06-73217 (9th Cir.
Funded by the Erb Family Foundation and the Joyce Foundation, the project comes on the 50 th anniversary of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, a high point of environmental diplomacy, and the U.S. CleanWaterAct, a pivotal piece of American environmental law. Once Cleared Harmful Blooms. did it once before. .
Fifty years ago the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement was signed and the CleanWaterAct was enacted to clear pollution from the region’s waters. cleanwater statute, though, give farmers and their wastes special treatment. A principal reason farmers won’t is because they don’t have to.
It's a natural resource and an economic one; many problems blight our oceans today, not least of all overfishing and the dumping of waste. In 2008, there were 400,000 with over 90% of them in captive herds with a gradual increase in wild herds of both plains and woodland bison. They are vital for life and home to thousands of species.
Court of Appeals issued a ruling that lends legal muscle to a five-year old petition that Food & Water Watch and 36 allies filed to compel the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to update CAFO permitting regulations. to issue new rules that limit discharges of CAFO wastes into waters. Water worries.
Fish and Wildlife Service, called it a waste of money and destructive to the environment. After decades of controversy, the project was vetoed by the EPA in 2008 under the CleanWaterAct. Critics, including the U.S. It would have damaged wetlands in two wildlife refuges and a national forest.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content