This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
EPA did not revoke EPA’s underlying authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the CleanAirAct. While this authority—itself rooted in a prior Supreme Court decision , the 2007 Massachusetts v. And here, the Court has struck a devastating blow. ” Justice Kagan, dissenting. But will we?
In 2007, Google committed to carbon neutrality in its operations. For our existing sites in PJM, this means that we are working to bring on a portfolio of new, round-the-clock carbon-free generation resources that can produce as much or more energy each hour than we consume. MW-Day For 2025/26 Delivery Compared To $28.92/MW-Day
Laws Covered Laws covered by the order-- Department of Energy-- Atomic EnergyAct of 1954; National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987; Energy Policy Act of 1992; Energy Policy Act of 2005; and Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.
Back in 2007, the Supreme Court reached a landmark judgment in Massachusetts et al. establishing that heat-trapping emissions (or greenhouse gas emissions) are air pollutants covered by the CleanAirAct. What is the Endangerment Finding? Environmental Protection Agency et al. What is Zeldin being directed to do?
Hes working out how to evade the 2007 Supreme Court decision that enabled EPA to limit carbon dioxide emissions. Hes c ancelling grants, incentives, and levying tariffs intended to squelch production and sales of cleanenergy generating equipment and electric vehicles. They also are helping the U.S.
Back in 2007, the Supreme Court reached a landmark judgment in Massachusetts et al. establishing that heat-trapping emissions (or greenhouse gas emissions) are air pollutants covered by the CleanAirAct. What is the Endangerment Finding? Environmental Protection Agency et al. What is Zeldin being directed to do?
Following the 2007 landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. EPA , the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has regulated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from motor vehicles under the CleanAirAct. 497 (2007), the Supreme Court reversed EPA’s denial. EPA , 549 U.S.
EN: These standards—or at least something based on the same CleanAirAct provision—have been in the works for a long time. The Clean Power Plan was the culmination of years of legal and technical haggling over EPA authority and obligations, including the landmark Massachusetts v. EPA Supreme Court decision in 2022.
GGRF does not, for the most part, directly implicate local governments, but it is meant to fund cleanenergy, clean transportation, and energy efficiency investments in cities across the country, including by providing capital to community lenders like credit unions and community development financial institutions (CDFIs).
In the EOs, President Trump orders federal agencies and personnel to take certain actions or to report back on actions that could be taken in the future that would stifle federal cleanenergy programs, steer funding away from disadvantaged populations and communities, or both. A regulatory shift away from EVs will take time.
EPA’s 2024 Power Plant Rules EPA is required to regulate power plant emissions under Section 111 of the CleanAirAct. In 2007, the Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v. First, they repeal the Trump-era Affordable CleanEnergy Rule. The Power Plant Rules consist of three main agency actions.
Today, the Supreme Court decided its most important environmental case since 2007. In order to regulate existing power plants—especially existing coal-fired plants—EPA turned to section 111(d) of the CleanAirAct. We didn’t dodge the bullet. The case has a complicated legal and regulatory background.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content