This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
These potential intervenors alleged that the additional emissions during the stay period would harm their interest in protecting their residents from the effects of airpollution and climate change. The California Supreme Court denied three petitions for review.
First, multiple local community members talked about their experiences with apathetic decisionmakers, energy burdens, airpollution, legacy contamination, and the impacts on their respiratory health. Many discussed exacerbations of allergies by airpollution. This is about environmental racism.”
None of that means climate change isn’t, and won’t continue to be, a factor in global health, particularly if action to prevent it also reduces airpollution, or removes other health stressors. Carbon emissions are thus following the same trajectory as other airpollutants. For example, the Green New Deal proposed by Rep.
Outdoor airpollution accounts for approximately 3.7 – 4.8 µm in diameter, which include our black carbon particles of interest, have been shown to be particularly problematic because they can penetrate deep into the lungs and blood stream and cause cardiovascular and respiratory disease (Pope and Dockery, 2006; Brook et al.,
The Biden administration laid out its timeline for rolling back major Trump environmental rules, but acknowledged that the process of enacting more protective regulations on climate and airpollution and drinking water will take years — if they can estimate the timeline at all.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content