This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Last week, the US EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) finalized updated regulations for certain facilities that emit ethylene oxide (EtO), a colorless, cancer-causing gas. Under the CleanAirAct, EPA is required to review and revise standards for “hazardous air pollutants” (including ethylene oxide), every eight years.
EnvironmentalProtection Agency. EPA did not revoke EPA’s underlying authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the CleanAirAct. This term, alongside a number of cases with the potential for seismic implications, the Supreme Court also took up West Virginia v. ” Justice Kagan, dissenting.
Breathing ethylene oxide in the air over a long period of time is associated with an increased risk of developing cancer, especially white blood cell and breast cancers. Workers at these facilities and children who are exposed are especially at risk.
EnvironmentalProtection Agency et al. Once Congress passes protective laws like the CleanAirAct, agencies have generally had deference to implement those laws based on the latest scientific evidence of harms caused by pollutants and options to limit those harms.
AGREES TO PAY OVER $1 MILLION FOR CLEANAIRACT VIOLATION Department of Justice PaulaR Mon, 08/28/2023 - 12:50 Saturday, June 25, 2005 Read more WASHINGTON, D.C.-The EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) today announced a CleanAirAct settlement with Volkswagen of America, Inc.
The EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) has known for years that emissions of ethylene oxide —a colorless, odorless gas used to sterilize medical equipment and some food products—pose a long-term cancer risk to communities near commercial sterilizing facilities. This is a blatant example of environmental injustice.
The Department of EnvironmentalProtection published notice in the November 6 PA Bulletin it is suspending the enforcement of the California Heavy-Duty Diesel Emissions Control Program in Pennsylvania through July 31, 2023. The Program's emission standards first applied to MY 2005 HDD vehicles and engines.
is a shift for this historically CleanAirAct-friendly Court. It is the first “anti-environmental” decision in the CAA realm since their 2007. The Court has a history of groundbreaking decisions in the realm of environmental law and the lesser-publicized. EnvironmentalProtection Agency. Michigan v.
In 2005 the company paid out €5.2 refinery to settle federal charges that it violated the CleanAirAct, the US Department of Justice and the EnvironmentalProtection Agency said May 1. million to eight Burmese villagers who sued the company for human rights abuses. Total to pay $2.9 agreed to pay $2.9
In 2005 the company paid out €5.2 refinery to settle federal charges that it violated the CleanAirAct, the US Department of Justice and the EnvironmentalProtection Agency said May 1. million to eight Burmese villagers who sued the company for human rights abuses. Total to pay $2.9 agreed to pay $2.9
In 2005 the company paid out €5.2 refinery to settle federal charges that it violated the CleanAirAct, the US Department of Justice and the EnvironmentalProtection Agency said May 1. million to eight Burmese villagers who sued the company for human rights abuses. Total to pay $2.9 agreed to pay $2.9
In 2005 the company paid out €5.2 refinery to settle federal charges that it violated the CleanAirAct, the US Department of Justice and the EnvironmentalProtection Agency said May 1. million to eight Burmese villagers who sued the company for human rights abuses. Total to pay $2.9 agreed to pay $2.9
In 2005 the company paid out €5.2 refinery to settle federal charges that it violated the CleanAirAct, the US Department of Justice and the EnvironmentalProtection Agency said May 1. million to eight Burmese villagers who sued the company for human rights abuses. Total to pay $2.9 agreed to pay $2.9
In 2005 the company paid out €5.2 refinery to settle federal charges that it violated the CleanAirAct, the US Department of Justice and the EnvironmentalProtection Agency said May 1. million to eight Burmese villagers who sued the company for human rights abuses. Total to pay $2.9 agreed to pay $2.9
In 2005 the company paid out €5.2 refinery to settle federal charges that it violated the CleanAirAct, the US Department of Justice and the EnvironmentalProtection Agency said May 1. million to eight Burmese villagers who sued the company for human rights abuses. Total to pay $2.9 agreed to pay $2.9
Several workers have also been injured and others killed in explosions at the Point Comfort plant in 2005 and at a PVC plant in Illiopolis , Illinois in 2004. PERI Pollution Indexes Based on United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency data ranking the top 100 worst polluters.
Risky Business: The New Shell by WWF-UK (2005). Environmental Groups Sue Shell Oil for CleanAirAct Violations at Deer Park Refinery and Chemical Plant Mike Metzger | Environment Texas | January 7, 2008 Sierra Club and Environment Texas filed a lawsuit today in federal district court against Shell Oil Company and several affiliates.
Risky Business: The New Shell by WWF-UK (2005). Environmental Groups Sue Shell Oil for CleanAirAct Violations at Deer Park Refinery and Chemical Plant Mike Metzger | Environment Texas | January 7, 2008 Sierra Club and Environment Texas filed a lawsuit today in federal district court against Shell Oil Company and several affiliates.
Risky Business: The New Shell by WWF-UK (2005). Environmental Groups Sue Shell Oil for CleanAirAct Violations at Deer Park Refinery and Chemical Plant Mike Metzger | Environment Texas | January 7, 2008 Sierra Club and Environment Texas filed a lawsuit today in federal district court against Shell Oil Company and several affiliates.
Risky Business: The New Shell by WWF-UK (2005). Environmental Groups Sue Shell Oil for CleanAirAct Violations at Deer Park Refinery and Chemical Plant Mike Metzger | Environment Texas | January 7, 2008 Sierra Club and Environment Texas filed a lawsuit today in federal district court against Shell Oil Company and several affiliates.
Risky Business: The New Shell by WWF-UK (2005). Environmental Groups Sue Shell Oil for CleanAirAct Violations at Deer Park Refinery and Chemical Plant Mike Metzger | Environment Texas | January 7, 2008 Sierra Club and Environment Texas filed a lawsuit today in federal district court against Shell Oil Company and several affiliates.
Risky Business: The New Shell by WWF-UK (2005). Environmental Groups Sue Shell Oil for CleanAirAct Violations at Deer Park Refinery and Chemical Plant Mike Metzger | Environment Texas | January 7, 2008 Sierra Club and Environment Texas filed a lawsuit today in federal district court against Shell Oil Company and several affiliates.
Risky Business: The New Shell by WWF-UK (2005). Environmental Groups Sue Shell Oil for CleanAirAct Violations at Deer Park Refinery and Chemical Plant Mike Metzger | Environment Texas | January 7, 2008 Sierra Club and Environment Texas filed a lawsuit today in federal district court against Shell Oil Company and several affiliates.
USA: VW executive given the maximum prison sentence for his role in Dieselgate Sean O'Kane | The Verge | December 6, 2017 The man who was in charge of Volkswagen’s US environmental and engineering office before the Dieselgate scandal has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Agrees to Pay Over $1 Million for CleanAirAct Violation U.S.
USA: VW executive given the maximum prison sentence for his role in Dieselgate Sean O'Kane | The Verge | December 6, 2017 The man who was in charge of Volkswagen’s US environmental and engineering office before the Dieselgate scandal has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Agrees to Pay Over $1 Million for CleanAirAct Violation U.S.
USA: VW executive given the maximum prison sentence for his role in Dieselgate Sean O'Kane | The Verge | December 6, 2017 The man who was in charge of Volkswagen’s US environmental and engineering office before the Dieselgate scandal has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Agrees to Pay Over $1 Million for CleanAirAct Violation U.S.
USA: VW executive given the maximum prison sentence for his role in Dieselgate Sean O'Kane | The Verge | December 6, 2017 The man who was in charge of Volkswagen’s US environmental and engineering office before the Dieselgate scandal has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Agrees to Pay Over $1 Million for CleanAirAct Violation U.S.
USA: VW executive given the maximum prison sentence for his role in Dieselgate Sean O'Kane | The Verge | December 6, 2017 The man who was in charge of Volkswagen’s US environmental and engineering office before the Dieselgate scandal has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Agrees to Pay Over $1 Million for CleanAirAct Violation U.S.
USA: VW executive given the maximum prison sentence for his role in Dieselgate Sean O'Kane | The Verge | December 6, 2017 The man who was in charge of Volkswagen’s US environmental and engineering office before the Dieselgate scandal has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Agrees to Pay Over $1 Million for CleanAirAct Violation U.S.
USA: VW executive given the maximum prison sentence for his role in Dieselgate Sean O'Kane | The Verge | December 6, 2017 The man who was in charge of Volkswagen’s US environmental and engineering office before the Dieselgate scandal has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Agrees to Pay Over $1 Million for CleanAirAct Violation U.S.
USA: VW executive given the maximum prison sentence for his role in Dieselgate Sean O'Kane | The Verge | December 6, 2017 The man who was in charge of Volkswagen’s US environmental and engineering office before the Dieselgate scandal has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Agrees to Pay Over $1 Million for CleanAirAct Violation U.S.
USA: VW executive given the maximum prison sentence for his role in Dieselgate Sean O'Kane | The Verge | December 6, 2017 The man who was in charge of Volkswagen’s US environmental and engineering office before the Dieselgate scandal has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Agrees to Pay Over $1 Million for CleanAirAct Violation U.S.
EnvironmentalProtection Agency announced it is strengthening its proposed standards to cut methane and other harmful air pollution. If finalized, these critical, commonsense standards will protect workers and communities, maintain and create high-quality, union-friendly jobs, and promote U.S.
Today’s the day for the long-awaited release of EnvironmentalProtection Agency regulations to tackle planet-warming pollution by the nation’s power plants. So, EPA and the states have a shared responsibility to regulate “existing sources” — primarily power plants— under Section 111(d) of the CleanAirAct.
Agencies tasked with protecting public health and the environment, such as DOH [Department of Health] and the DEP [Department of EnvironmentalProtection], have pointed out that they lacked adequate resources to conduct the full breadth of their responsibilities.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, RGGI states Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont have been implementing the nation’s first mandatory “cap and invest” program for the electricity power sector since 2005. RGGI states distribute more than 90 percent of allowances.
EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) and other governmental entities to allow continued enforcement of environmental laws related to ongoing mining operations. Murray Energy Sought Supreme Court Review of Fourth Circuit’s Dismissal of CleanAirAct Jobs Study Case. Foster , No. 34-2016-CR-00187 (N.D.
Last month, the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) proposed new power plant carbon pollution standards that, if strengthened, would go a long way to help meet the Biden administration’s goal of slashing carbon emissions in half from 2005 levels by the end of this decade. EPA Supreme Court decision in 2022.
Last year, hundreds of community members, regulatory agencies, and advocates ( including UCS ) weighed in on the US EnvironmentalProtection Agency’s (EPA) proposed standards to strengthen the Risk Management Program (RMP). Well, the EPA can.”
The EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) developed the Solar for All and Clean Communities Investment Accelerator programs to direct GGRF funding as required by statute. The EPA and NHTSA rulemakings are completed, as is Californias Section 209 waiver for Advanced Clean Cars II.
By railing against what he calls a “radical climate change movement” and suing the federal government to protect corporate polluters. In 2015, when he took office as AG after stints in the Texas Legislature, he sued the EnvironmentalProtection Agency for strengthening a standard for ground-level ozone, better known as smog.
EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) orders granting three petitions for extensions of small refinery exemptions from renewable fuel standards. The plaintiffs argue that the situation is worse for Peruvians born between 2005 and 2011, whose futures are severely compromised due to the climate crisis. Chao , No. Trump , No.
The first petition was filed by West Virginia and 18 other states that had intervened to defend the repeal and replacement rule, known as the Affordable Clean Energy rule. The states asserted counts under the Administrative Procedure Act and of ultra vires action. Seven weeks after the U.S. 66,496 (Dec. 15,2 2009).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content