Acoel

OCTOBER 1, 2022

The Supreme Court is stepping once more into Clean Water Act “waters of the United States,” more popularly known as WOTUS. If you’re a Clean Water Act wonk, there may be a little voice in the back of your head yelling, “Theeeey’re baaack!” United States.

Clean Water Act 40

Clean Water Act 2001 2006 2008 40

The Energy Law Blog

MAY 17, 2011

Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) released new proposed guidance on how the agencies will identify waters protected by the Clean Water Act (CWA) in light of Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. 159 (2001) (SWANCC) and Rapanos v. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006).

Clean Water Act 40

Clean Water Act 2011 2001 2006 40

Acoel

JUNE 15, 2021

Decades of steelmaking had produced enormous quantities of hazardous wastes, including metals and organics, which were disposed of in unlined ditches and ponds, or simply dumped on the ground. This resulted in contamination of soils, surface water and groundwater, and runoff into the Patapsco River.

Waste 40

Waste Clean Water Act 2001 2010 40

Ohio Environmental Law

SEPTEMBER 4, 2023

EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) issued a direct final rule without public comment amending the definition of the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) which governs the scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) v.

Clean Water Act 52

Clean Water Act 2001 2006 Regulations 52

Ohio Environmental Law

SEPTEMBER 4, 2023

EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) issued a direct final rule without public comment amending the definition of the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) which governs the scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) v.

Clean Water Act 52

Clean Water Act 2001 2006 Regulations 52

Greenbuilding Law

APRIL 25, 2021

Senate Bill 334 / House Bill 76 establish that a person who meets the threshold standing requirements under the federal Clean Water Act has an unconditional right and the authority to intervene in a civil action initiated by the State in State court to require compliance with certain water pollution control measures.

Law 52

Law 2021 Recycling Regulations 52

Acoel

JUNE 6, 2023

While the justices were not all in agreement with the new test set forth in the majority decision in Sackett , none supported the “significant nexus” test suggested by Kennedy in Rapanos as being authorized by the Clean Water Act (CWA), and all concurred in the judgment. 159 (2001). Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S.

Clean Water Act 105

Clean Water Act 2001 Ocean 2006 105