This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Supreme Court is stepping once more into CleanWaterAct “waters of the United States,” more popularly known as WOTUS. If you’re a CleanWaterAct wonk, there may be a little voice in the back of your head yelling, “Theeeey’re baaack!” United States.
Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) released new proposed guidance on how the agencies will identify waters protected by the CleanWaterAct (CWA) in light of Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. 159 (2001) (SWANCC) and Rapanos v. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006).
EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) issued a direct final rule without public comment amending the definition of the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) which governs the scope of federal jurisdiction under the CleanWaterAct (CWA). EPA issued the rule to conform its regulations to the ruling of the U.S.
EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) issued a direct final rule without public comment amending the definition of the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) which governs the scope of federal jurisdiction under the CleanWaterAct (CWA). EPA issued the rule to conform its regulations to the ruling of the U.S.
In 2001 Bethlehem Steel declared bankruptcy. Because Sparrows Point was the biggest employer in the state, EPA and the Maryland Department of the Environment did little to enforce compliance with environmental laws despite major violations throughout the 1970s, ‘80s and ‘90s.
While the justices were not all in agreement with the new test set forth in the majority decision in Sackett , none supported the “significant nexus” test suggested by Kennedy in Rapanos as being authorized by the CleanWaterAct (CWA), and all concurred in the judgment. 159 (2001). Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) : Set up by the EPA to determine standards for cleanwater (part of the CleanWaterAct). It prohibits the discharge of polluting chemicals into US waters unless a special permit is granted. 10 Key International Environmental Laws.
Enforcing the CleanWaterAct and investing in the pollution-reduction practices that provide cleanwater and mitigate climate change will be paramount to CBF success going forward.” Falk is a champion for women’s leadership and advancing equity in the conservation movement.
Senate Bill 334 / House Bill 76 establish that a person who meets the threshold standing requirements under the federal CleanWaterAct has an unconditional right and the authority to intervene in a civil action initiated by the State in State court to require compliance with certain water pollution control measures.
Supreme Court begins its October term today with a wetlands lawsuit that could redefine the CleanWaterAct. Tribes tell the Bureau of Reclamation to prioritize long-term infrastructure solutions for the $4 billion in Inflation Reduction Act funds for western drought response. It was the worst output since 2001.
2023 was a rough year for cleanwater. The Supreme Court took a hammer to the CleanWaterAct with its decision in Sackett v. The Sackett decision was a tremendous loss for everyone who depends on cleanwater—that is, for all of us. In response, 27 states sued , and the rule was put on hold.
The CleanWaterAct requires that industrial sources reduce their discharges, but it left two big questions unanswered: Would EPA or the states set the pollution limits? American Trucking Ass’ns, 531 457 (2001) (Justice Scalia). Unless the Court moderates its views, future regulations will face tough sledding.
The bill also would establish a grant program under the Safe Drinking WaterAct for assistance to community water systems affected by PFAS to pay for capital costs associated with treatment technologies. The House bill ( H.R.
It includes NEPA, the CleanWaterAct, the Endangered Species Act, and CERCLA, to name but a few. Since 2001, the waiver provision has been enacted five times, to exclude action from environmental statutes. The scope of the waiver asserted in the August 2017 determination is truly breathtaking.
3277 ) to codify a Trump administration regulation that limited states’ ability to block fossil fuel projects under the CleanWaterAct. EPA – Proposed Settlement Agreement, CleanWaterAct. EPA – Draft Human Health and/or Ecological Risk Assessments for Several Pesticides; Notice of Availability.
Senators reintroduce Recovering America’s Wildlife Act. Judge rules Maui County, Hawaii must receive a CleanWaterAct permit in a case that reached the Supreme Court. The bill also requires the EPA to determine whether PFAS should be designated as a toxic pollutant under the CleanWaterAct.
The rule reinstates protections created by the Forest Service’s 2001 Roadless Rule. EPA: The agency issued a rare CleanWaterAct veto, further stopping the proposed Pebble copper and gold mine in Bristol Bay, Alaska. Nominations are due March 2, 2023.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content